SeekNDestroy
Well-known member
- Messages
- 3,338
- Reaction score
- 4,524
😂I believe the article was originally reported by the SF chronicle.
😂I believe the article was originally reported by the SF chronicle.
Kid has some anger management issues.
![]()
Confiscated Nintendo Switch prompts student to pummel high school worker
The attack at Matanzas High School in Palm Coast, Florida, was captured on video. A teen has been charged with felony aggravated battery.www.nbcnews.com
Yeah, the propaganda being peddled by the outrage machine at Fox/right wing media on this issue is strange.Was recently in Oyster Point in SF. No homeless, no feces on sidewalks, no used syringes. Pretty nice & upscale.
I believe it’s an entitlement issue, which then led to being angry… which then you have to question his coping skills and his reaction to said anger as well as his value system of valuing his Nintendo more than another humans safely.Kid has some anger management issues.
![]()
Confiscated Nintendo Switch prompts student to pummel high school worker
The attack at Matanzas High School in Palm Coast, Florida, was captured on video. A teen has been charged with felony aggravated battery.www.nbcnews.com
He should never be let in another public school in the United States.
He’ll be back. No consequences. He’ll be out on no bail and no punishment from a weak prosecutor before he really hurts someone and then we’ll call for tougher laws and criticize the arresting officer.He should never be let in another public school in the United States.
He’ll be back. No consequences. He’ll be out on no bail and no punishment from a weak prosecutor before he really hurts someone and then we’ll call for tougher laws and criticize the arresting officer.
Lots of commenters asked why the person filming the murder didn’t intervene. Half the responses seemed to be the following: A Soros funded DA would’ve had the cop or Good Samaritan locked up for life while the murderer collected a payout.He’ll be back. No consequences. He’ll be out on no bail and no punishment from a weak prosecutor before he really hurts someone and then we’ll call for tougher laws and criticize the arresting officer.
"Hastings was charged with special-circumstance murder, and the district attorney’s office sought the death penalty, but the jury deadlocked. A second jury convicted him, and he was sentenced in 1988 to life in prison without possibility of parole."![]()
L.A. man wrongly imprisoned for decades is declared innocent after DNA evidence points to a different suspect
Maurice Hastings was released last year after more than 38 years behind bars for a 1983 murder he didn’t commit. A judge declared him innocent Wednesday.www.nbcnews.com
I don't know how much you actually got to see SF recently but I go out there a few times/year for work and if you go anywhere near the tenderloin, I'll guarantee you'll hear countless homeless people screaming and will undoubtedly step in human shit if you don't watch your feet actively.Yeah, the propaganda being peddled by the outrage machine at Fox/right wing media on this issue is strange.
Having lived in the Bay Area I can say with absolute certainty that it is safer and more yuppie upscale than is has ever been.
In the 80’s places like the Vats (an abandoned brewery that served as a biker meth lab and a place for punk/hardcore shows) were pretty common.
In Oakland this bar called Eggberts used to be a hangout for the local hustlers and gangsters. It’s now a hipster bar.
You wanna see a completely shit city? Go to Kevin Mcarthys district and take a drive around Bakersfield. I grew up down by there and the last time I drove through there much of it looked like a set piece from the Walking Dead.
Every city has their bad areas. The tenderloin has been bad for several decades. And if you think SF’s homeless population is bad (it is), you should see LA. Skid Row:downtown is pretty rough. They have an estimated 60k homeless.I don't know how much you actually got to see SF recently but I go out there a few times/year for work and if you go anywhere near the tenderloin, I'll guarantee you'll hear countless homeless people screaming and will undoubtedly step in human shit if you don't watch your feet actively.
There are nicer areas of SF where you won't see that but less areas are immune than they were even 10 years ago. This is not propaganda, at least insofar as it's the worst homeless population I've ever seen (admittedly I haven't been to Pittsburgh). They have huge homeless camps near some of our work buildings in the Mission district as well.
Maybe that's not so bad to some of you or you've had more exposure to the homeless.
I didn't read the Fox article so I don't know if it was outlandish or not but I can see SF's homeless population as really bad but apparently LA is even worse. (I haven't been to LA)Every city has their bad areas. The tenderloin has been bad for several decades. And if you think SF’s homeless population is bad (it is), you should see LA. Skid Row:downtown is pretty rough. They have an estimated 60k homeless.
I don’t get my news from Fox..or CNN…or MSNBC…or MSM. I do see a lot of videos that local activists shoot & narrate w/ their camera phones showing fentanyl users, used syringes on the sidewalk & trash bags full of human feces. Same goes for the videos of folks walking into a CVS, taking what they want & walking out w/ no threat of apprehension. I don’t give a Fiddler’s Fuck what your politics are…that shit will just get worse if it’s allowed to continue.Yeah, the propaganda being peddled by the outrage machine at Fox/right wing media on this issue is strange.
Having lived in the Bay Area I can say with absolute certainty that it is safer and more yuppie upscale than is has ever been.
In the 80’s places like the Vats (an abandoned brewery that served as a biker meth lab and a place for punk/hardcore shows) were pretty common.
In Oakland this bar called Eggberts used to be a hangout for the local hustlers and gangsters. It’s now a hipster bar.
You wanna see a completely shit city? Go to Kevin Mcarthys district and take a drive around Bakersfield. I grew up down by there and the last time I drove through there much of it looked like a set piece from the Walking Dead.
I've been to both LA and Seattle a couple of times in the past few months. I assume it was a case of not visiting the right areas, but I never saw any of the homeless in LA, but in Seattle, they're flippin' everywhere. Tent cities all over the place along the Interstate and in the parks. They've taken over a lot of Seattle.My son was in Seattle for work a few years ago. He was walking downtown with some co-workers and went to give a homeless guy $5. The homeless guy started yelling at him for not giving more.
Every city has the good and bad sides. It's not surprising that LA's is that large given the population.
My wife owns a restaurant in the City. This perception of “bad” is relative. I go there every once in awhile. Compared to the late 80’s what you are seeing and experiencing in SF isn’t that bad.I don't know how much you actually got to see SF recently but I go out there a few times/year for work and if you go anywhere near the tenderloin, I'll guarantee you'll hear countless homeless people screaming and will undoubtedly step in human shit if you don't watch your feet actively.
There are nicer areas of SF where you won't see that but less areas are immune than they were even 10 years ago. This is not propaganda, at least insofar as it's the worst homeless population I've ever seen (admittedly I haven't been to Pittsburgh). They have huge homeless camps near some of our work buildings in the Mission district as well.
Maybe that's not so bad to some of you or you've had more exposure to the homeless.
Anybody with a cellphone and a Twitter account can amplify whatever it is they choose to focus on. The City is considerably safer and cleaner than when I lived there. The smash and grab, CVS robbing shit that went down wasn’t random. It was organized. Pretty sure a large operation just recently got busted.I don’t get my news from Fox..or CNN…or MSNBC…or MSM. I do see a lot of videos that local activists shoot & narrate w/ their camera phones showing fentanyl users, used syringes on the sidewalk & trash bags full of human feces. Same goes for the videos of folks walking into a CVS, taking what they want & walking out w/ no threat of apprehension. I don’t give a Fiddler’s Fuck what your politics are…that shit will just get worse if it’s allowed to continue.
Serious question: how does Oyster Point keep the homeless away?
Also, what’s Geary Street like today? I heard Lefty O’Doul’s closed and that it has really deteriorated since I was last there in the early 2000s.
Skid Row has been bad since time immemorial. Bukowski made his whole career writing about it.Every city has their bad areas. The tenderloin has been bad for several decades. And if you think SF’s homeless population is bad (it is), you should see LA. Skid Row:downtown is pretty rough. They have an estimated 60k homeless.
The solution is to live somewhere it gets cold enough to kill people at night. We ain't ever gonna have a homeless problem up here lmaoooSkid Row has been bad since time immemorial. Bukowski made his whole career writing about it.
Jokes about the homeless are hilarious!🤣The solution is to live somewhere it gets cold enough to kill people at night. We ain't ever gonna have a homeless problem up here lmaooo
BingoDo we have a homeless problem or is it a symptom of a mental illness and drug addiction problem?
Those contribute to the problem for sure. So do things like short term rentals (Airbnb), private equity moving into housing as an investment and the super wealthy buying multiple homes that they visit maybe a couple times a year. All that is a big problem in the area I live in that has become a tourist destination.Do we have a homeless problem or is it a symptom of a mental illness and drug addiction problem?
So help me with this thinking because i've heard it floated by another person. So when people can't afford homes in high cost of living areas they just transition to the street?Those contribute to the problem for sure. So do things like short term rentals (Airbnb), private equity moving into housing as an investment and the super wealthy buying multiple homes that they visit maybe a couple times a year. All that is a big problem in the area I live in that has become a tourist destination.
We can go on for days with that tree... mental illness and drug addiction stem from other issues or trauma.Do we have a homeless problem or is it a symptom of a mental illness and drug addiction problem?
Some people absolutely simply transition to the streets. With SF and LA in particular based on my experience a number of the young people who move there are from marginalized groups (gay and trans) and or dysfunctional family situations. So that plays a factor in terms of some of the family support networks.So help me with this thinking because i've heard it floated by another person. So when people can't afford homes in high cost of living areas they just transition to the street?
That doesn't seem to be a true storyline for people when there are other options. People can move to lower COL areas or look for different jobs, or lean on family or friends or I'm guessing many other options I've not had to consider. This is not aimed at anyone and it excludes the mentally ill and drug-addicted (and they aren't mutually exclusive obviously).
I live in a very low COL area so I'm not exposed to the homeless situations of big cities often (work trips or vacations) so perhaps I'm just shielded from the harsh reality that someone has their rent raised in LA or SF or NY and instead of moving or working more or looking for a higher paid position, they just transition to the homeless life.