Riddickulous
"That" Guy
- Messages
- 16,866
- Reaction score
- 8,325
This has been beaten to death, but Rees if far more accurate and efficient than Crist.
I would actually have started Crist against Michigan. Hear me out.
Crist earned the job through a lot of practice/scrimmage/reps in spring ball and fall ball. Then he gets pulled after one poor half. OK. Fair for that game. And don't get me wrong, Tommy Rees outplayed him and made a lot of throws I didn't think he could make, but what about the big picture where Crist obviously did something to put him ahead of Rees?
The thing is... we know Tommy can come off the bench and play well. If you give Dayne a couple drives and he isn't doing it you can bring in Tommy. What the hell do you do if Tommy has a couple bad drives? Give him a whole half? The whole game? Where is the leash and how can Dayne do coming off the bench?
I just think it's strange to change your entire plan for the season based on one bad half of football. Lord knows some of the greatest QBs in college and the NFL have played bad games... much less bad halves.
DISCLAIMER: I 100% think Rees gives us the best chance to win.
I can stand on the practice tee and hit 95+% good shots. On the golf course, I am lucky if I hit 25%.That's a great question, Lax, and it may be a serious problem for us going forward.
Is Crist capable of providing leadership off the bench? Does Kelly start using Hendrix/ Golson more now in the redzone, thereby supplanting Crist at the #2 as well?
My concern is that there seems to be a significant disparity between what Crist can do in practice and what he can do under pressure. How does such a player remain a serious contender when you've got hungry athletic talent waiting on the bench behind Rees?
That's a great question, Lax, and it may be a serious problem for us going forward.
Is Crist capable of providing leadership off the bench? Does Kelly start using Hendrix/ Golson more now in the redzone, thereby supplanting Crist at the #2 as well?
My concern is that there seems to be a significant disparity between what Crist can do in practice and what he can do under pressure. How does such a player remain a serious contender when you've got hungry athletic talent waiting on the bench behind Rees?
Didn't look like it Saturday.
I would actually have started Crist against Michigan. Hear me out.
I am becoming a Rees fan. He gets the ball out quickly. He makes a decision and delivers it. The team seems to react well around him. While he doesn't have the accolades that Crist has, he's a better fit for this offense.
you make really good points...I think Dayne and Rees were alot closer in competition than what was reported. Either way, Dayne didnt seperate himself from Tommy until 2 weeks before the season started, and even then I dont remember Dayne being 'on fire' or anything like that. Maybe the quick hook that Dayne got says more about BK's confidence in Tommy Rees...idk, I feel for Dayne, but excited for Tommy.
However, I totally agree with NDinLA, Tommy has 'it'. Whatever you want to call it, for me it falls in the the category of "intangibles". I saw it last year when I referred to him as 'a winner', he has one of those famous 'coaches intangibles'; he's a winner.
I would actually have started Crist against Michigan. Hear me out.
Crist earned the job through a lot of practice/scrimmage/reps in spring ball and fall ball. Then he gets pulled after one poor half. OK. Fair for that game. And don't get me wrong, Tommy Rees outplayed him and made a lot of throws I didn't think he could make, but what about the big picture where Crist obviously did something to put him ahead of Rees?
The thing is... we know Tommy can come off the bench and play well. If you give Dayne a couple drives and he isn't doing it you can bring in Tommy. What the hell do you do if Tommy has a couple bad drives? Give him a whole half? The whole game? Where is the leash and how can Dayne do coming off the bench?
I just think it's strange to change your entire plan for the season based on one bad half of football. Lord knows some of the greatest QBs in college and the NFL have played bad games... much less bad halves.
DISCLAIMER: I 100% think Rees gives us the best chance to win.
explain to me why a losing record and a history of being a terrible quarterback means that Crist deserves a start lax? explain that to me please. is it because he's handsome? because he's muscular? because he's tall?
you said it yourself - Rees gives us the best chance to win. why not give him as much time to do that as possible? a few drives? Notre Dame Football owes Crist NOTHING. not a thing. thousands of kids have worked their tail and not seen a snap for this program. he had MORE time than is fair to prove he's the best QB on the roster. he did not. this is a non-discussion as far as i'm concerned.
I don't even think this should be debateable, Rees is the man this Saturday night. Every single time he has been called upon, he has accepted the challenge and played not just good, but exceptionally. Even as a Freshman. I feel like he's only going to get better going forward and we have a bright future to look forward to, led by Rees as the QB from here until he is drafted into the NFL.
I agree with the posts above. Something about him just makes you feel that he is a winner and that the team plays best when he is in the game. While Rees excels when things aren't looking too good, Crist, to me, has only shown that he struggles in the tough moments. I hesitate to call him a front runner, but that's honestly what I feel like he is.
explain to me why a losing record and a history of being a terrible quarterback means that Crist deserves a start lax? explain that to me please. is it because he's handsome? because he's muscular? because he's tall?
What??
Rees has a better comp % in 2010, better passer rating... 1 more pick, but ZERO losses.
I would actually have started Crist against Michigan. Hear me out.
Crist earned the job through a lot of practice/scrimmage/reps in spring ball and fall ball. Then he gets pulled after one poor half. OK. Fair for that game. And don't get me wrong, Tommy Rees outplayed him and made a lot of throws I didn't think he could make, but what about the big picture where Crist obviously did something to put him ahead of Rees?
The thing is... we know Tommy can come off the bench and play well. If you give Dayne a couple drives and he isn't doing it you can bring in Tommy. What the hell do you do if Tommy has a couple bad drives? Give him a whole half? The whole game? Where is the leash and how can Dayne do coming off the bench?
I just think it's strange to change your entire plan for the season based on one bad half of football. Lord knows some of the greatest QBs in college and the NFL have played bad games... much less bad halves.
DISCLAIMER: I 100% think Rees gives us the best chance to win.
At the same time, he still locks in on Michael Floyd .
That's what this whole stupid argument of Dayne and Tommy and BK's screaming and dropping F Bombs all boils down to........
WINNING
Nothing else matters. NOTHING.
If you're talking about the team in general, nothing else matters. But if you are evaluating two players it is unfair to pretend like there are no other factors that go into winning or losing other than who is playing quarterback.
Look, nobody denies that Tommy played better than Dayne on Saturday. To boil it down to "Tommy wins" ignores all the other factors that go into playing winning football and oversimplifies the situation.
As I've pointed out previously, if Jonas doesn't fumble and Floyd doesn't hold and Theo doesn't mishandle the punt, ND goes into the half with a comfortable lead and there is no QB change. Conversely, if Cierre had fumbled on his short TD run in the 2nd half and that fumble was returned for a TD, all of a sudden Tommy's "near-comeback" is a pretty ho-hum 30-13 drubbing and maybe people aren't so excited about Tommy.
The relative success and failure of Dayne and Tommy last Saturday were based in large part on plays made or not made by other players that the QBs had nothing to do with. Similarly, it has often been noted that the difference in their records last year can largely be attributed to the improvement of the defense for the portion of the year that Tommy started.
None of this is to say that I wouldn't start Tommy against Michigan (although I do think Lax's argument for starting Dayne makes some sense). I just think that some fans seem so infatuated with Tommy that they cannot give a fair evaluation of Dayne. And Maybe NDinL.A. is right, that the team just responds to Tommy differently and there is some ethereal quality that makes Tommy better because he makes the team better. Or something.
But I don't understand the motivation of some of you guys to be needlessly harsh in evaluating of Dayne, like you cannot simply say you prefer Tommy start but also have to trash the other kid in the process. I don't get that. The kid plays for your team. He has never done anything to disgrace the University. Not only are statements like Dayne "has a history of being a terrible quarterback" (and other such statements) ridiculously wrong football-wise, but they are totally unnecessary thing to say about a kid that plays college football for the team you root for.
Never said I disliked the kid... I said in another thread that I think that he's the superior athlete. I also said in another thread that he's not necessarily a BK recruit who fits his system. I love the kid to death and it's really tough to argue against his measurables, but somethings starting to ring in my noggin that this kid just doesn't meld within BK's offensive scheme. He's a Weis guy who was recruited for a "Pro-Set" offense... How well does he translate to the spread? It's been a struggle to this point, but I'm keeping an open mind.
Also, please don't lump me in with, "the motivation of some of you guys"....
I have no motivation here...I just want to freaking win....
Go Irish...Beat Meat-Chicken
"If the coaches though Crist > Rees after months of auditioning then it's pretty crazy to think that he should be doomed based on one half of football."
nah man, cause in those MONTHS, there was no football. look at the football games.
if you think Rees has only outplayed Crist in 1/2 of a game then you and I aren't watching these games the same way.
I'm cool man - I'm also a laxer (LSM and i will prob take the ball away from you every time 1on1.... sort of kidding)