ColinKSU
Well-known member
- Messages
- 4,647
- Reaction score
- 6,163
Take it with a grain of salt, but it makes sense
Respectfully. Give me money.
Take it with a grain of salt, but it makes sense
Respectfully. Give me money.
Hey, he’s welcome to work any mark out of their money that he can. Not my money, but I’m sure someone will give him theirs to read whatever he made up.Why should the out-of-the-loop beat writers be the only ones who can make money with poorly sourced info? I don't care for Goolsby, but if folks are going to fork money over to people like Singer and Driskell, I don't blame him for trying to get a piece of that action.
Why should the out-of-the-loop beat writers be the only ones who can make money with poorly sourced info? I don't care for Goolsby, but if folks are going to fork money over to people like Singer and Driskell, I don't blame him for trying to get a piece of that action.
Goolsby did not buy into the Hartman hype and as time went by that turned into frustration - by the end he was repulsed that Hartman got the biggest ovation at senior day rather than the 4th year fella’s (as was i).To this point, has anyone else heard how many times Goolsby has talked about how Notre Dame made Hartman a millionaire? I know he got NIL but the amount of times Goolsby mentioned it made me think he was resentful as hell towards Sam. I also love how Driskell talks about how everything is about money and how college football exploits players for profit...but doesn't he do the same thing? Reaching out to recruits and sharing information about them to his subscribers for profit. Hell, at least college kids are 18+ adults...some of the recruits he reaches out to are 15-16 year old kids. Everytime IB or Shaun Davis talk about how they are in the know or have reliable relationships with these kids it comes off as cringey as hell. Shaun Davis specifically has made statements about Tate and Scott and his "relationship" with them. It's like dude you're a grown ass man over here trying to convince people you have a personal relationship with some high school kid...it's weird
Goolsby is saying that the accusations of Stuckey losing the WR room are inaccurate. But won't expand on that unless you pay him for that information.I can follow the exchange of texts at all as per usual. I don’t understand who is accusing who of what. Did Goolsby hear this rumour or is he responding to someone else who heard the rumour?
That's ok, be like Prime and just shop and pull from the portal each year! LOLWe need to upgrade if we plan on hiring someone, Mike Brown doesn't do it for me. Also 2025 class has no WR's committed yet.
It supposedly was a lot of things and MF was planning on moving on with him after the season anyways do to coaching techniques and lack of player development. Supposedly he was the reason Zo Styles left last year. The fact that guys were planning to go to the portal because of him just escalated the timeline. They were already planning on moving on prior to the complaints.I doubt MF canned him because some WR's complained. It had to be a MF / CS thing.
Yeah, the quality of the players (Jimmys and Joes) is much more important than the quality of the coachThe amount of attention position coaches get on message boards these days is kinda funny to me.
There was only one upperclassman available to play most of the season.I wonder if some of the upperclassmen are getting butt hurt because their snaps got taken away by Freshman who were playing better
I doubt MF canned him because some WR's complained. It had to be a MF / CS thing.
I am 100% convinced that Stuckey took issue with Parker and Freeman chose a side. Freeman is riding the Parker train to one of two places:Thinking it’s gotta be WR development and some kind of friction with Parker
What upperclassmen?I wonder if some of the upperclassmen are getting butt hurt because their snaps got taken away by Freshman who were playing better
Stuckey is in his third year of any form of coaching at any level so if he's trying to fight for control of the meeting room that's a problem.I am 100% convinced that Stuckey took issue with Parker and Freeman chose a side. Freeman is riding the Parker train to one of two places:
- BOOMville
- BUSTville
Not saying it was a power play.Stuckey is in his third year of any form of coaching at any level so if he's trying to fight for control of the meeting room that's a problem.
It does make you wonder if the experiment of him trying to play DB had something to do with it?It supposedly was a lot of things and MF was planning on moving on with him after the season anyways do to coaching techniques and lack of player development. Supposedly he was the reason Zo Styles left last year. The fact that guys were planning to go to the portal because of him just escalated the timeline. They were already planning on moving on prior to the complaints.
Love the Mike Goolsby Show. He lives and breathes Notre Dame football. He is not the analyst that Jamie U is, but he is not afraid to speak his mind on things.
If Goolsby said it, then he probably did lose the WR room. However, given the fact Stuckey is gone and we've lost Merriweather and possibly James that points to it being more of a Porker problem.Goolsby is saying that the accusations of Stuckey losing the WR room are inaccurate. But won't expand on that unless you pay him for that information.
Really? What if there were more that had a problem with Stuckey and if he were to stay ND would have lost 4+ from the room.If Goolsby said it, then he probably did lose the WR room. However, given the fact Stuckey is gone and we've lost Merriweather and possibly James that points to it being more of a Porker problem.
We may have lost 2 more WRs since Stuckey was fired if the James transfer news is true. That tells me either Porker is the real problem, or those guys supported Stuckey and the "lost the WR room" was just noise to cover the truth.Really? What if there were more that had a problem with Stuckey and if he were to stay ND would have lost 4+ from the room.
So either interpretation, it's Pucker's fault? Got it.We may have lost 2 more WRs since Stuckey was fired if the James transfer news is true. That tells me either Porker is the real problem, or those guys supported Stuckey and the "lost the WR room" was just noise to cover the truth.
This week has been nothing but speculation and blaming Parker for everything.So either interpretation, it's Pucker's fault? Got it.