5thHorseman
New member
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 2
This post is so much more useful than the "no excuses" posts. So often college football is win and everything is great, lose everything sucks.
It's like every year how the OL doesn't just pancake every DLman on every play starting in the first game, and we all questioned the quality of the line. But then by the end of the year they look good, are statistically excellent, and get kids drafted high. We all spend the off-season praising HH. Rinse, wash, repeat. The emotional reaction isn't always the right one.
Here, a lot sucked, but there are a lot of factors playing into why a lot of it was Texas just being effective. Swoops scored like 14 TDs last year and they ran over a lot of schools when they could not pass AT ALL. They now have some passing weapons and it makes for a interesting offense, especially when our safety play is so questionable.
My Texas friend who re-watched the game on the Texas network where they take out all the time between snaps said that we lost because we took Kizer out. He also noted that out OL was very effective. Our defense did not stop them, but that may turn out to be because they are hard to stop. This was Texas, not West Texas Tech--maybe they're pretty good on top of our mistakes.
ND has a lot of years where a mediocre team, like Wake Forest, will slow us down more than, say, Stanford or USC. Texas beat Oklahoma and Baylor, and lost to Iowa State last year. What does that mean? Alabama didn't stop Clemson last year. USC, and all their talent, didn't even slow Alabama down.
Saban sold his soul to the devil for Alabama to always be that much better than whoever they're playing.
