greyhammer90
the drunk piano player
- Messages
- 16,843
- Reaction score
- 16,139
I do want to be clear, the issue at ND is bigger than BK. Far bigger. We haven't won a title since 1988, clearly this is indicative of something systematic and institutional. The institution is NOT in any way committed to winning. I will continue to call this hypocritical because I've grown more jaded to ND as an institution over the years.
ND has zero problem making a mockery of their so called Catholic beliefs and mission by supporting pro-choice politicians, supporting modernist gender theory, transgender rights, gay marriage, etc. Yet they mount their academic high horse when it comes to the program that has buttered their bread for the better part of a century. They don't have any cherished principles and they're not committed to any higher ideal, they are cheap and don't want to spend the money to put a quality product on the field. They act like the football program is some embarrassment to them, some red headed step child, and the not the breadwinner for the university for 100 years. ND football is the reason people in China and Africa know about the university. ND football is the reason midwestern boys like me dream of going to school there even if we can't play football well enough to make the team. "Rudy" doesn't get made for a middle tier football program.
I do think ND can do better than BK right now because BK is a coach in decline, but we're never going to "wake up the echoes" again until the administration changes its tune. Like I said earlier, ND either needs to A) do what is necessary to at least obtain a Stanford level of winning (a good role model program for us since they have similar academic standards and seemingly don't sell their soul completely SEC style) or B) just admit that they aren't interested in winning.
We're a top football program "to the extent it complies with our mission."