Biden Presidency

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,372
Reaction score
5,716
Pretty flimsy. The same pandemic that he called the "China virus" and was first to point the finger at the Chinese lab?
The same trade deal Obama setup that Trump got us out of to protect American interests?
How did China benefit from Ivanka's trademarks? Sounds more like Ivanka benefited.
He repeatedly tweeted out how he trusted Xi and his handling of the outbreak. I'm not trying to tit for tat, for but Yankee asked for examples and I provided them. I was referring to this trade deal China bought none of the extra $200 billion of US exports in Trump's trade deal.

China didn't just grant Ivanka trademarks for free.

Come on gents. Hypocrisy is a swing and miss here. The Trump stuff has been hashed and rehashed a thousand times, yet when it comes to Joe and his frat boy party son, all we hear is Simon and Garfunkel.
Yet no one has defended him? If Hunter is guilty of everything he's accused of then of course he should be thrown in jail. I think it's quite telling to see who repeatedly wants to defend Trump yet I don't see anyone defending possible things Hunter has done. Haven't seen a "Biden derangement syndrome" or "China hoax" or any other trope for this. Would be curious to see if you can find a post/example of someone blindly defending any of the accusations of what people claim Biden is doing.
 

Rockin’Irish

Hearing Impaired
Messages
3,245
Reaction score
2,510
I think it’s clear that there is plenty of corruption to go around for people that are in political or other ”power” positions and they will go to great lengths to hide it. To me that’s a given and never a surprise. I think it’s firmly ingrained in human nature and we see it happen over and over ad nauseum. It would be great if all of the people who swim in that pool would be equally held accountable but political agendas and media slant rarely allow that to happen.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,403
He repeatedly tweeted out how he trusted Xi and his handling of the outbreak. I'm not trying to tit for tat, for but Yankee asked for examples and I provided them. I was referring to this trade deal China bought none of the extra $200 billion of US exports in Trump's trade deal.

China didn't just grant Ivanka trademarks for free.
Trump was more contentious with China than his predecessors or successor. From Day 1 he showed support for Taiwan, a slap in the face to the mainland. He came closer than anyone to outright recognizing Taiwan's sovereignty. Trump tweets lots of things, but who was the first to point the finger to them as a potential lab leak? As facts started coming out he was certainly less supportive. Between that, the Taiwan policy, blowing up Obama's trade deal, I'm not seeing a lot of bending over for China when it comes to Trump's reign. Bending over has been Biden's MO.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,372
Reaction score
5,716
Trump was more contentious with China than his predecessors or successor. From Day 1 he showed support for Taiwan, a slap in the face to the mainland. He came closer than anyone to outright recognizing Taiwan's sovereignty. Trump tweets lots of things, but who was the first to point the finger to them as a potential lab leak? As facts started coming out he was certainly less supportive. Between that, the Taiwan policy, blowing up Obama's trade deal, I'm not seeing a lot of bending over for China when it comes to Trump's reign. Bending over has been Biden's MO.
Trump ran on claiming to be "tough" on China, and win the trade war. Yet he oversaw the biggest trade deficit of any president. So I'm not sure where his contentious'ness comes from? Maybe his rhetoric? But hardly in the sense that many who liked his nationalist approach to economics believe. Trump and those that liked him saw the trade deficit as a bad thing, and by that measure he failed on his own goals of taking it to China. International Trade We'll see what Joe Brandon does with trade balance with China but he hasn't come close to hitting the high that Trump hit. Tough words comfort the fee fees but in terms of action his trade war largely negatively impacted American's while at the same time not doing anything substantial from a trade deficit perspective.

For the record - I don't feel strongly either way about a trade surplus/deficit as it requires a ton of nuance to say which one is better. Depends on the productivity, and a country like the US has been at the forefront of having incredible productivity gains without substantial input cost changes to match (yay unbridled capitalism).
 

Te'o4Heisman

Well-known member
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
2,616
Trump ran on claiming to be "tough" on China, and win the trade war. Yet he oversaw the biggest trade deficit of any president. So I'm not sure where his contentious'ness comes from? Maybe his rhetoric? But hardly in the sense that many who liked his nationalist approach to economics believe. Trump and those that liked him saw the trade deficit as a bad thing, and by that measure he failed on his own goals of taking it to China. International Trade We'll see what Joe Brandon does with trade balance with China but he hasn't come close to hitting the high that Trump hit. Tough words comfort the fee fees but in terms of action his trade war largely negatively impacted American's while at the same time not doing anything substantial from a trade deficit perspective.

For the record - I don't feel strongly either way about a trade surplus/deficit as it requires a ton of nuance to say which one is better. Depends on the productivity, and a country like the US has been at the forefront of having incredible productivity gains without substantial input cost changes to match (yay unbridled capitalism).
Funny you should say that and it is certainly true if you believe CNN and politico and reporting many of the US news agencies that have leaned further and further left for years. On the other hand, the Chinese newspapers acknowledge the US trade deficit with China dropped steeply in between 2018 and 2021 after many of the Trump policies took effect. Basically we live in a world where anything can be, and is true based on where you get your information.
 

Te'o4Heisman

Well-known member
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
2,616
I also want to add that I am not implying one side is right or wrong here, just basically that so much of the data and perspectives we are fed is unreliable, skewed and in many cases flat out untrue and in the end none of us know shit about shit.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,372
Reaction score
5,716
Funny you should say that and it is certainly true if you believe CNN and politico and reporting many of the US news agencies that have leaned further and further left for years. On the other hand, the Chinese newspapers acknowledge the US trade deficit with China dropped steeply in between 2018 and 2021 after many of the Trump policies took effect. Basically we live in a world where anything can be, and is true based on where you get your information.
I literally posted the source from the US Government? It showed in 2018 Trump oversaw a record high trade deficit with China.

I can't remember, were you the guy that claimed the Left doesn't understand finance and then complained about capital gains taxes. To which I laid a basic tax planning strategy that anyone who owns a profitable business in 2023 should have done? Did you do that? Or is tax planning and tax minimizing Leftist?

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,627
Reaction score
2,732
I literally posted the source from the US Government? It showed in 2018 Trump oversaw a record high trade deficit with China.

I can't remember, were you the guy that claimed the Left doesn't understand finance and then complained about capital gains taxes. To which I laid a basic tax planning strategy that anyone who owns a profitable business in 2023 should have done? Did you do that? Or is tax planning and tax minimizing Leftist?

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk

Wait - what is this basic strategy? Asking for a friend.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,372
Reaction score
5,716
Wait - what is this basic strategy? Asking for a friend.
Crystalize the value of your company every 6-10 years to avoid paying larger capital gains taxes down the line. Especially when governments are changing to a more aggressive capital gains tax policy. Don't think our friend knew that.

If you own a business you should be doing this now.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,372
Reaction score
5,716


Yes! Yes! Do them all, I really want to see what dumb shit hunter got himself involved with. How the fuck you get some incompetently involved with shady tax dealings after your family has been in the public sphere for your entire life is a colossal fuck up. There is so much legal corrupt shit that is done by politicians that you have to be a special breed of stupid to get caught.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,090


Yes! Yes! Do them all, I really want to see what dumb shit hunter got himself involved with. How the fuck you get some incompetently involved with shady tax dealings after your family has been in the public sphere for your entire life is a colossal fuck up. There is so much legal corrupt shit that is done by politicians that you have to be a special breed of stupid to get caught.

That's why dad's been working to keep it under wraps. I can see this becoming bigger closer to election time.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,372
Reaction score
5,716
That's why dad's been working to keep it under wraps. I can see this becoming bigger closer to election time.
I remember looking at Biden's taxes and I don't think there's a likely chance he's caught up in anything hunter related. His taxes were less sophisticated than many of my clients. If he wasn't Joe Biden I would expect him to just be some generic old rich guy.

The likely outcome for Hunter is that he gets smacked with fines on under reported income if there is any. I highly doubt there is jail time coming for him. Money laundering for ultra wealthy hardly gets anything more than hefty fines.

The biggest exposure that I think to him is that if he is trying to shelter corporate money with taking crazy salaries to divert IRS attention away from potential shady business dealings he could have triggered an IRS audit on the reasonableness of his salary. Typically, the IRS does this to see if the owner of the company is trying to move income to his family members to lower the overall tax burden, but Hunter could have done this to take money out of the corporation so that the IRS wouldn't care about the corporation. This would be jokes af because you need to be historically incompetent to do that.

Another unlikely risk area for Hunter is if he is also being investigated for bank fraud, however I think he is too much of a train wreck to actually go to the bank to get loans. If there is a 3rd party element to this then I could see jail time. Which is why the biggest risk to Trump was always the asset inflation allegations. A true blessing in disguise for Hunter that he liked coke and hookers more than actually trying to make money.

I won't get my hopes up that Hunter gets cooked by the IRS since he's likely not smart enough to entangle himself in anything too serious.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,090
WTH Joe!?


Starting on May 1, the Biden administration will be mandating higher mortgage rates and monthly fees for Americans with good credit scores and, in turn, rewarding favored citizens with lower credit scores and smaller down payments.

According to the Daily Wire, the White House made the loan-level price adjustments in the name of equity as federal officials attempt to appease radical race activists across the nation.

“The changes do not make sense,” senior loan officer at Bay Equity Home Loans Ian Wright said. “Penalizing borrowers with larger down payments and credit scores will not go over well. It overcomplicates things for consumers during a process that can already feel overwhelming with the amount of paperwork, jargon, etc. Confusing the borrower is never a good thing.”

Buyers with credit scores of 679 or below will receive lower fees and more favorable rates. Buyers with debt-to-income ratios over 40% will also be charged, despite protestations from the Mortgage Bankers Association.

“Most borrowers” seeking mortgages will see increases due to the changing of the fee structure.

Professionals working in the field roundly criticized the plan, explaining that the extension of the mortgage application process simply adds more pressure to an already falling housing market.

“It’s going to be a challenge trying to explain to somebody that says, ‘I worked my whole life for high credit and I’ve put a lot of money down and you’re telling me that’s a negative now?’ That’s a hard conversation to have,” one expert told the New York Post.

Even some Obama officials came out against the plan. “It’s unprecedented,” David Stevens, Federal Housing Administration commissioner under President Barack Obama, told the Post. “My email is full from mortgage companies and CEOs [telling] me how unbelievably shocked they are by this move.”

The Biden administration continued to deny that the country is hurtling towards recession, despite abysmal reports from the Commerce Department, skyrocketing inflation and the failures of several large banks.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,934
Reaction score
6,161
I'm sure certain people here who are so outraged by threats to democracy, dishonest politicians, corruption in the government, and cheating in elections will be absolutely outraged about Joe getting the CIA to declare very damaging and VERY true info about him and his son as nothing but Russian disinformation. Same info the NYT said was phony before the election and then later admitted they knew was true.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,409
Reaction score
5,833
I'm sure certain people here who are so outraged by threats to democracy, dishonest politicians, corruption in the government, and cheating in elections will be absolutely outraged about Joe getting the CIA to declare very damaging and VERY true info about him and his son as nothing but Russian disinformation. Same info the NYT said was phony before the election and then later admitted they knew was true.
Biden lied.

 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,403
Biden lied.


I'm sorry, but Joe said that the heads of 5 intelligence offices all deduced that the Hunter story was Russian disinformation.
This is pretty sad, if we didn't have enough reasons these days to question these intelligence agencies, it turns out they can be manipulated to help sway elections. It's no wonder people question the last two Presidential elections. Hell, the Democrats have even shown they're willing to rig their own primary in favor of Hillary in 2016.
 
Top