Biden Presidency

GoIrish41

Paterfamilius
Messages
9,929
Reaction score
2,120
Again, don't misrepresent what I say. I always say exactly what I mean. It needs no spin nor reinterpretation from you or anyone else. Don't try to misrepresent it or twist it. If your points are valid, you'll have no need to do so.
Every time you get caught with your dick in your hand you puff up and pretend your points are being misrepresented. Nobody misrepresented what you said. What’s weak is your lack of cognitive discipline that prevents you from contradicting yourself continuously based on the course of a conversation. What makes you full of shit is that you try to cover your tracks with disingenuous, semantic bullshit, seemingly unaware that everyone can go back and read what you posted before.
 
Last edited:

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,362
Reaction score
5,709
I just see him playing semantics to avoid having to square his comments.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I consulted a dictionary like I was so nicely told to do, and I saw that mislead is a synonym of hoax :(

At the end of the day, a poster from the Right claimed the Trump doc thing was "This wasn't another misleading, overblown, political stunt just before an election or anything, right?" and yet wants to criticize Biden on his own document issues. #1 in another thread said no one said it is ok, however we have a poster claiming it to be a "political stunt" - so where is the calling out of that poster? Crickets?
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,160
I just see him playing semantics to avoid having to square his comments.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Far from it. A hoax is usually a complete lie. I never said the word hoax, and never thought it in making the post Toronto quoted. I said, "This wasn't another misleading, overblown, political stunt just before an election or anything, right?" My point was that the raid on Trump's home in search of classified documents was "conveniently" timed to occur just before the midterm election, and that most of the mainstream press would certainly portray it in the most dishonest and slanted way possible, while doing everything they could to make it a bigger deal than it was. I never claimed there were no documents and the raid or search was a hoax. It wasn't and I never thought it was. My point was that the press would exaggerate, slant, mislead, and blow it out of proportion just before an election. But I'm sure you and Toronto already understood that. Misrepresenting what I obviously meant is standard strawman stuff.

Now, you want a hoax? A hoax would be an intentional lie such as paying for a false report from a disreputable former spy, KNOWING the info in it was false, and then using it to justify a FISA warrant and years of phony investigations. I don't give a flip about Trump, but I have no tolerance for that sort of dishonesty and abuse of power.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,160
I consulted a dictionary like I was so nicely told to do, and I saw that mislead is a synonym of hoax :(

At the end of the day, a poster from the Right claimed the Trump doc thing was "This wasn't another misleading, overblown, political stunt just before an election or anything, right?" and yet wants to criticize Biden on his own document issues. #1 in another thread said no one said it is ok, however we have a poster claiming it to be a "political stunt" - so where is the calling out of that poster? Crickets?
Don't misrepresent what I say. It's weak.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Far from it. A hoax is usually a complete lie. I never said the word hoax, and never thought it in making the post Toronto quoted. I said, "This wasn't another misleading, overblown, political stunt just before an election or anything, right?" My point was that the raid on Trump's home in search of classified documents was "conveniently" timed to occur just before the midterm election, and that most of the mainstream press would certainly portray it in the most dishonest and slanted way possible, while doing everything they could to make it a bigger deal than it was. I never claimed there were no documents and the raid or search was a hoax. It wasn't and I never thought it was. My point was that the press would exaggerate, slant, mislead, and blow it out of proportion just before an election. But I'm sure you and Toronto already understood that. Misrepresenting what I obviously meant is standard strawman stuff.

Now, you want a hoax? A hoax would be an intentional lie such as paying for a false report from a disreputable former spy, KNOWING the info in it was false, and then using it to justify a FISA warrant and years of phony investigations. I don't give a flip about Trump, but I have no tolerance for that sort of dishonesty and abuse of power.
You are funny.

There is some delicious irony to you saying all that when you are committed to the misrepresentation of the reasons for the Russia investigation as being a "hoax". Which it wasn't/isn't.

For evidence, I'd say actually read the entire Mueller report. You may also want to read about how this Russia "hoax" theory got crushed in court. Or maybe how it was the chairman/editor of the Washington Free Beacon (not a lib), for multiple GOP candidates, that originally hired Fusion GPS to do oppo research on Trump. The Clinton campaign took over paying for that work when Trump secured the nomination.

Mueller Report

Trump loses lawsuit against everyone involved in Russia "hoax"

Origins of the "dossier".
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,106
Reaction score
12,944
Far from it. A hoax is usually a complete lie. I never said the word hoax, and never thought it in making the post Toronto quoted. I said, "This wasn't another misleading, overblown, political stunt just before an election or anything, right?" My point was that the raid on Trump's home in search of classified documents was "conveniently" timed to occur just before the midterm election, and that most of the mainstream press would certainly portray it in the most dishonest and slanted way possible, while doing everything they could to make it a bigger deal than it was. I never claimed there were no documents and the raid or search was a hoax. It wasn't and I never thought it was. My point was that the press would exaggerate, slant, mislead, and blow it out of proportion just before an election. But I'm sure you and Toronto already understood that. Misrepresenting what I obviously meant is standard strawman stuff.

Now, you want a hoax? A hoax would be an intentional lie such as paying for a false report from a disreputable former spy, KNOWING the info in it was false, and then using it to justify a FISA warrant and years of phony investigations. I don't give a flip about Trump, but I have no tolerance for that sort of dishonesty and abuse of power.
It’s too bad Trump couldn’t have avoided that whole situation by, oh I don’t know, just handing over the documents when he was asked to originally.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,160
It’s too bad Trump couldn’t have avoided that whole situation by, oh I don’t know, just handing over the documents when he was asked to originally.
And I agree, he should have. For a number of reasons, the man had a propensity for doing unnecessary stuff that hurt his cause. Grandiosity, talking too much, the immature tweeting, and such cost him reelection. He made battles out of nothing, with the classified document thing being a good example.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,591
Reaction score
20,047
It’s too bad Trump couldn’t have avoided that whole situation by, oh I don’t know, just handing over the documents when he was asked to originally.
He was so pissed off from losing the election, he was going to do something. Pretty sure this was Trump as he was leaving the White House.

z5XRgBB.jpg
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
5,459
It’s too bad Trump couldn’t have avoided that whole situation by, oh I don’t know, just handing over the documents when he was asked to originally.
Avoiding the whole situation would be not having classified documents. It’s becoming a circus, who’s storing of classified documents is the worst. But then missing the whole storing of classified documents part.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,386
Why is Biden celebrating Chinese New Year and saying they're starting a new tradition of celebrating it? Feels like cultural appropriation, but what do I know? I'm not the big guy with a hand in the Chinese piggy bank.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,591
Reaction score
20,047
Why is Biden celebrating Chinese New Year and saying they're starting a new tradition of celebrating it? Feels like cultural appropriation, but what do I know? I'm not the big guy with a hand in the Chinese piggy bank.
His caring feelings for every ethnicity or culture is so fake it’s way too obvious. He tries too hard.
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,011
Reaction score
5,049
Lunar New Year is huge in many countries not just China. Hell I know a ton of faithful Catholics who celebrate it, Chinese, Vietnamese, so on and so forth. It’s a cultural celebration


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

SeekNDestroy

Well-known member
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
4,524
His caring feelings for every ethnicity or culture is so fake it’s way too obvious. He tries too hard.
Or maybe he’s just a really good and decent guy. At least that’s what EVERYONE on both sides of the aisle said about him before he was president.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,591
Reaction score
20,047
Or maybe he’s just a really good and decent guy. At least that’s what EVERYONE on both sides of the aisle said about him before he was president.
You know the difference between Trump and Biden? Very little except Joe doesn’t have the ego. Many thought he was a good guy until he went under the microscope and his dirty laundry was uncovered.
 

SeekNDestroy

Well-known member
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
4,524
You know the difference between Trump and Biden? Very little except Joe doesn’t have the ego. Many thought he was a good guy until he went under the microscope and his dirty laundry was uncovered.
He went under the microscope when he was vetted by Obama. What did they find? NOTHING.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,362
Reaction score
5,709
You know the difference between Trump and Biden? Very little except Joe doesn’t have the ego. Many thought he was a good guy until he went under the microscope and his dirty laundry was uncovered.
Still waiting for Biden's six bankruptcies, illegal charity, fraudulent university, accountants calling him a liar and dropping him as a client, and his countless lawsuits from the 70's to now ranging from multiple sexual assault claims and general business matters - but yes, after all that they are basically the same.
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
Still waiting for Biden's six bankruptcies, illegal charity, fraudulent university, accountants calling him a liar and dropping him as a client, and his countless lawsuits from the 70's to now ranging from multiple sexual assault claims and general business matters - but yes, after all that they are basically the same.
Don’t forget the various members of his campaign, business and legal teams who have ended up in prison. Totally the same.
 

jprue24

Well-known member
Messages
2,895
Reaction score
3,245
Still waiting for Biden's six bankruptcies, illegal charity, fraudulent university, accountants calling him a liar and dropping him as a client, and his countless lawsuits from the 70's to now ranging from multiple sexual assault claims and general business matters - but yes, after all that they are basically the same.
You forgot stiffing contractors
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
And I agree, he should have. For a number of reasons, the man had a propensity for doing unnecessary stuff that hurt his cause. Grandiosity, talking too much, the immature tweeting, and such cost him reelection. He made battles out of nothing, with the classified document thing being a good example.

DeSantis won't.

Ron DeSantis will be the 2024 President. He's the rare 6* political prospect. He's the Trevor Lawrence of politics.

Any Trump / Dem pom pom-ers wanna disagree?
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
DeSantis won't.

Ron DeSantis will be the 2024 President. He's the rare 6* political prospect. He's the Trevor Lawrence of politics.

Any Trump / Dem pom pom-ers wanna disagree?

Yes, I just took DeSantis over BOTH fields.

I get big odds for that.
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
Yes, I just took DeSantis over BOTH fields.

I get big odds for that.
Mmmm…I’d pump the brakes on the sure fire slam dunk stuff and wait and see what level of crazy the GOP majority in the house decides to tack towards.
 
Top