Irish Insanity
Well-known member
- Messages
- 9,885
- Reaction score
- 584
Judging by the last few posts above, Pat is banned permanently? Lets fucking party.
November 25, 2013...a day that will live in IE infamy.
Judging by the last few posts above, Pat is banned permanently? Lets fucking party.
To be honest, previous moderators have been less lenient with far more reputable posters than irishpat (like Bogtrotter, Neut, etc.), and while I understand that some will disagree with the decision or miss irishpat, know that the decision was made in consensus after many weeks of discussion.
I think there are a lot of people happy to be rid of someone who spent the entirety of his time trolling, and I think there are others that have other reasons related to the views he expressed. To each their own.
Judging by the last few posts above, Pat is banned permanently? Lets fucking party.
Looking at your pic and reading this made me giggle.
I imagined a kool aid partay!
Hahaha I guess we're all pretty much collectively the dimmest bulbs in fixture, as it never seems to work correctly. Although we now have a workaround that hopefully cuts down on the collateral damage.
The only time I actually tried to use it to ban permanently (today) it instead applied 1 point infraction expiring in 1 day to the post. Go figure. Had to try it all over again on another post to get it to take. Cockroaches...
Never liked them creepy things, real or those made from bytes.
Pat would be laughing his ass off if he knew how he's currently the center of attention.
...I think there are a lot of people happy to be rid of someone who spent the entirety of his time trolling...
The "entirety of his time trolling"? So he was trolling when he posted photos of his twins and his family? And had that long discussion on variable annuities? Come on.
Calling him a "troll" may be convenient for the banning narrative, but there's a difference between voicing opinions abrasively, and sometimes without tact, on the one hand, and posting for the sole purpose of inflaming emotions (i.e., "trolling"). He did the former, not the latter. So ban him if you want, but he decidedly was not "trolling".
Come on, man.
Well over 90% of his posts were antagonistic, insulting or angry. His posts that weren't were certainly an exception.
Fair enough. But the things he wrote he actually believed, and the opinions posted were truly his own -- he wasn't doing it for any "trolling" purpose.
Not true. Check out LAX's post from a couple pages ago. Pat's most recent commentary in Yeargin's thread was obviously trolling. Maybe he started out as a sincere as$hole, but if so, he willingly assumed the mantle of provocateur.
Fair enough. But the things he wrote he actually believed, and the opinions posted were truly his own -- he wasn't doing it for any "trolling" purpose.
My favorite was his joke "I hope Tommy gets injured." Which further lead to the thought:
![]()
But whatever, dude was a sensationalist and loved the attention.
Right, I can't get in his head for every post. But I think we can all agree that IrishLAX is wrong when he claims that IrishPat spent "the entirety of his time trolling".
In honor of those ban hammered.
Those with deserved voice, and those without:
Moroney Addresses the Court - YouTube
As I am on an apple device, I cannot embed. Embedded would be appreciated. Comedy, nonetheless.
I can't speak for him, but there are times I've yelled stuff like that at the TV and didn't mean it literally. Same thing when people called him out for calling someone a "piece of shit". I yell that at the TV all the time. Usually you're just venting.
I just received an email from the aforementioned… he would love to keep in contact with many, mentioned Grahambo and Kunejua specifically and he says to never forget, Lacrosse is a sport for pussies… (That last part I may or may not have been added for dramatic effect)…
LAX, you're my boy blue!
THis page won't loade beyond JK's video... ??
Email...or match.com message?
Email...or match.com message?
"Just want to rep you for sticking to your guns. I respect the hell outta you even if we disagree and you're outnumbered."
That is the last rep message that Pat sent to me just a few days before he got banned. I think he believed what he was saying and that he had respect for anyone who did the same. He certainly was never subtle and almost always blunt, but I don't think he was 'trolling' in the sense that he was making stuff up just to piss people off. I think he really enjoyed a spirited argument, and I can certainly understand anyone's perspective if they say he went too far. Sometimes I think he went too far, but I accepted that as his personality. I don't think he was a troll ... I just think he was abrasive. That's just my take.