BuaConstrictor
Well-known member
- Messages
- 3,277
- Reaction score
- 1,920
To be honest, I wish a lot of reporters would stop throwing out "This school's NIL budget is X".When I say average, I'm taking all players on the roster (minus players like Carr, and Love, for example), and sharing the realized average compensation across the entire team, per player.
The entire system is so convoluted.
The upfront money these schools pay(from multiple collectives) isn't truly known most of the time. It can be over or under reported. Then you have all the deals these kids get once they hit campus from things done outside of the school collectives (see the Sam Hartman example above) that aren't factored into the reporting.
For example, LSU has a decent enough NIL collective structure. They pay decently up front. It's competitive. However, their additional streams of revenue lag behind a lot of other places like ND. If you go to LSU you might get a nice up front check but you don't have the same total income potential as you might have at another school.
One former ND player found this out the hard way and wanted to come back.
All this is to say, if you hear a reporter mention a school's "NIL Budget" it might be wildly wrong...and even if it is correct down to the penny for the upfront collective money they are talking about it may not be at all indicative of the total earning potential/income of that roster due to deals made outside the NIL collective(s) budget.
Be wary.