As of 3 PM on 11/28/46
#1 ND has about a 6-1/2 lead over #2 UM.
What do you mean by this?
In '46 we were 6.5 games ahead of them in all time winning %? Why did you decide to bring up such a random year?
Mea culpa! Old Timer's Disease. Actually it wasn't random, instead of today's year I entered my birth date.
On this date in 1946 my parents had their first son. So far aside from being the most prolific poster on IE he hasn't amounted to squat. Also on this date in 1946, ND was a solid second a bunch of games behind Yale. ND took the lead over the next few years during Leahy's Post War Unbeaten Streak.
Michigan was in 4th between ... Princeton and Harvard. Minnesota, Alabama, Army, Texas, and Penn rounded out the Top 10. Vanderbilt was 12th.
Mea culpa! Old Timer's Disease. Actually it wasn't random, instead of today's year I entered my birth date.
On this date in 1946 my parents had their first son. So far aside from being the most prolific poster on IE he hasn't amounted to squat. Also on this date in 1946, ND was a solid second a bunch of games behind Yale. ND took the lead over the next few years during Leahy's Post War Unbeaten Streak.
Michigan was in 4th between ... Princeton and Harvard. Minnesota, Alabama, Army, Texas, and Penn rounded out the Top 10. Vanderbilt was 12th.
So we have a 6.5 game lead?
So we have a 6.5 game lead?
HTML:TEAM WINS LOSSES TIES PCT ND 892 312 42 0.7327 UM 924 331 36 0.7297
I think there's a screwy methodology when it comes to ties that bumps Texas up.I thought our competition was Texas for winning percentage
UPDATE
WE ARE NOW #2
Who gets to wear that jersey?
Not really a big deal.
Not really a big deal.
I saw Q wasn't wearing #1 after halftime.
That tradition probably needs to die right away, because it hasn't brought any luck or heart to this team.
As long as Harbaugh coaches Michigan and Kelly coaches ND they will keep moving farther and farther ahead of us.
Funny when you see that - Michigan has played 40-60 more games than OSU/ND/Bama.