notredomer23
Staph Member
- Messages
- 17,637
- Reaction score
- 17,563
Well that sucks... The admin will block fuND from having true impact and again we will be our own worse enemy.
That's why the fans have to take it into their own hands, which they can.
Well that sucks... The admin will block fuND from having true impact and again we will be our own worse enemy.
Absolutely.I think NOT having a class full of bag chasers could ultimately work out for ND.
lol Dabo
Stupid Marcus Freeman couldn't even make I understand recruiting better!Can’t be true. I was told it was a typical BK class. Those science bitches!
There are over 420 recruits who are rated 4-star or higher on the 247 composite in the 2023 class. I can't speak for previous classes.Does 247 give out more 4 star than they used to? I feel like the average player rankings in general are higher than they were 5 years ago for the same class ranking.
2023 Composite - 428 4/5 *sDoes 247 give out more 4 star than they used to? I feel like the average player rankings in general are higher than they were 5 years ago for the same class ranking.
Looking this up real quickThere are over 420 recruits who are rated 4-star or higher on the 247 composite in the 2023 class. I can't speak for previous classes.
I've put more blood, sweat, and tears into cheering on this program than most people on this board.
I'm happy with this class but I think this chart is a bit misleading, making the gap look much bigger than it actually is.
Except better than any class Kelly signed, top-to-bottom. I'm assuming that's what you guys mean
A- class. Another class like this or better in '24 and I truly believe we'll be competing for championships. The speed and lack of holes in these Freeman classes are just different. Yeah it's not a top 3-5 class, but getting top 6-8 classes year over year with top 200 athletes at WR and CB, stud QBs, in addition to the guys we normally get on the interior will bring us up a level. The talent will be more spread out too across CFB with NIL - Miami, Oregon, A&M, etc. will take some guys away that would normally sign with Clemson, Bama, and UGA. The difference is those programs won't develop like the blue bloods.
Without NIL I think we are in a better place no doubt, but I still think it's a HUGE leap over the Kelly classes, while keeping the developmental culture.
I thought this initially as well - but looking at our class and roster got me to thinking. It appears he's building his 3 man front. Obviously Keeley's a 5* you take and fits anythingI repeat - our MAJOR need ON THE DL was WDE...
Freeman a bit rattled IMO. Stumbled over his words a bit.
He probably also hasn’t slept much regardless to be fair lol
A statement you can't make without context, which you don't have.Not the brag you think it is.
I've been thinking the same for a while. It's why I haven't been super upset not getting a Vyper. We probably wanted Keeley because he may be the type that can single-sandedly disrupt an offense, so you build around him. But if you can't get that type of player, then avoid needing that type of player by playing 3 down and relying on having several similar types of LBs that each can rush or drop, causing confusion for the offense. With so many of the offenses now reading defenses and then reacting, basing your defense on the ability to cause post snap confusion may be the way to go.I thought this initially as well - but looking at our class and roster got me to thinking. It appears he's building his 3 man front. Obviously Keeley's a 5* you take and fits anything
Vernon, Houstan, Traore, Mukam - all 6'4"-6'5" - all play over 270, a couple closer to 300 probably.
Tyson Ford, West Mich. Target, Rubio, Mills, Onye, Keanaaina all 6'3+ all closer to 300 than 250.
Tuihalamaka and Burnham already moved to Vyper - standing up that's really an OLB. Zinter added in - getting another longer "large" LB/Outside player.