It’s a Wednesday game against Rutgers and then Friday game against bama if we winHave they announced day and time?
Usually the 16 seed is the first game and the 11/12 is the next. So we’ll probably start around 9:30 on WednesdayIt’s a Wednesday game against Rutgers and then Friday game against bama if we win
No times yet. They come out soon tho
Because the NET is utterly worthless, but let's keep on pretending it isn't.how is it that our irish have to play to get in at 22-10 but a bad 17-14 scUM team gets in
Yup exactly what I was thinkingUsually the 16 seed is the first game and the 11/12 is the next. So we’ll probably start around 9:30 on Wednesday
The beat Wiscy and IU on the road, but are much better at home.Rutgers is dominant at home and mediocre at best on the road. ND matches up well with them. This is a game they can and should win. So I doubt they will.
Hard to hate on the matchups. Rutgers and Bama are good, but neither I think has the ability to really exploit our big men. We may lose to either one, but I don’t think it will be because Atkinson/Laz are picked on.
This is important. Teams with good big men kill us. Teams with mediocre bigs we can handle as our bigs are mediocre.Hard to hate on the matchups. Rutgers and Bama are good, but neither I think has the ability to really exploit our big men. We may lose to either one, but I don’t think it will be because Atkinson/Laz are picked on.
Watching Purdue over the weekend...what a nightmare match up that game would be. Their two centers would have a field day against usThis is important. Teams with good big men kill us. Teams with mediocre bigs we can handle as our bigs are mediocre.
That being said I've seen neither team so have no idea if what you say is true.
Love it or hate it, a lot of people turn to the NET rankings and they were 34 in NET, which is two higher than even Sparty at 36. Notre Dame, on the other hand, was only 53.How the neck did Michigan even get in? I thought they would struggle getting into the NIT. 8th in Big 10, 17-14 and did not make a deep run in their tourney. That’s a joke.
Love it or hate it, a lot of people turn to the NET rankings and they were 34 in NET, which is two higher than even Sparty at 36. Notre Dame, on the other hand, was only 53.
Michigan had 5 Quad 1 wins and 3 Quad 2 wins vs. ND's 2 and 2, respectively. We were 4-9 in Quad 1 and 2 games. Not great.
Basically, in a year where the Big 10 was arguably the best and deepest conference in the nation (by a pretty wide margin, IMO) and the ACC was an utter joke, scUM is viewed as equal if not better.
Maybe they should have won more games. Same goes for any ND fans whining about going to Dayton first.Texas A&M fans are pissed in general. But they seem to be spewing most of their venom out on ND.
I feel like this profile is the bugaboo of every early exit ND has had in the tourney since I've been alive. Play some defensive team -> don't get foul calls -> don't rebound or make 3s -> lose handily.Rutgers won't hit threes and doesn't make foul shots, but they play wacky good defense.
If ND can knock down some early threes that is a good sign. I Think ND wins a scrap.
Yeah they aren't a great shooting team but we need to keep it that way and are not great on defense so they might shot better than their numbers indicate. And we might shoot worse than usual since they are good on D and their guards are 6-4, 6-6 and 6-7 so our 3 point shooting might be challenged.Rutgers won't hit threes and doesn't make foul shots, but they play wacky good defense.
If ND can knock down some early threes that is a good sign. I Think ND wins a scrap.
Yeah they aren't a great shooting team but we need to keep it that way and are not great on defense so they might shot better than their numbers indicate. And we might shoot worse than usual since they are good on D and their guards are 6-4, 6-6 and 6-7 so our 3 point shooting might be challenged.
If we don't hit from 3 we almost always lose. One thing to watch is can Atkinson get their big guy in foul trouble. Teir bench is non productive and they really have no back up bigs to speak of.
I hope so on Wesley. I’ve been nervous that coaches have figured out how to stop him. We need his driving capabilities to help open up the offense.Atkinson can be quite disruptive and productive against 2nd tier big men. Any inside game improves our odds substantially. I also think there is very little chance Wesley repeats the last performance. I am hopeful he takes his aggression out on the defensive end.
He's likely going to be guarded by the B10 defensive player of the year, so he'll either need to play lights out or we'll need to find alot of offense elsewhereI hope so on Wesley. I’ve been nervous that coaches have figured out how to stop him. We need his driving capabilities to help open up the offense.
Remember that FSU game in Chicago? Ugh. You described it. This was before we joined the ACC. ND was ranked pretty high and the game was over at the first Timeout.I feel like this profile is the bugaboo of every early exit ND has had in the tourney since I've been alive. Play some defensive team -> don't get foul calls -> don't rebound or make 3s -> lose handily.
That was the Mike Brey special in the NCAA tourney during the late 2000's and early 2010's. They'd shoot really well from beyond the arc, and then go into the tournament and suddenly they couldn't hit water if they fell out of a goddamn boat.I feel like this profile is the bugaboo of every early exit ND has had in the tourney since I've been alive. Play some defensive team -> don't get foul calls -> don't rebound or make 3s -> lose handily.