I thought 9-3 with Brandon's limitations, plus a win in a bowl game to make it 10-3...
I would have been right had they not made the QB change!
I guess most of us were right that Brandon's lack of accuracy throwing the ball would be a huge limitation... Ian gets a chance, completes greater than 65% of his passes, and the offense does what it needs to do, even with some personnel issues, and the team's ceiling suddenly got much higher.
Please, God, don't let BK f*ck up yet another "Returning Starter at QB" situation.
So what if an unknown Book had started the season (for whatever reason, BW was out). What would your prediction have been going into the year? Would it have been better than 9-3?
On the "returning starter at QB" comment, that's my biggest concern lol. I hope BK is realistic and works withing the talents of the total offensive squad. I do think Book has the potential to improve a bunch on the long ball if the OL improves, and we insert some of the speedier WRs. If the line is still unpredictable, I hope they don't try to force too much.
Ha, I forgot about this little scrum. In both Wiz's and my defense, I was still very green to the board and didn't fully understand the proper use of the "neg." We settled that quickly thereafter.
I was one off at 11-2, so I was happy to be wrong. I agree on your 9 win floor, YJ. Three tough road games give me pause on the 11. I think 10 wins is most realistic if the Irish protect their house.
Hell, Wiz deserves a neg rep each day
To me, if our D can replace the middle (Mike/Buck/NT/DT) we'll be just fine, and I think while we may have some early pains, we have the talent. I do think moving Bilal inside is the right thing to do, and I think our Mike will be fine. Rover to me is a wildcard. Could turn out to be great, or shit. DT/NT will be interesting and really my biggest concern on D.
If the OL takes a big step forward, I think this years offense can be much better, even with the questions at RB.