ab2cmiller
Troublemaker in training
- Messages
- 11,457
- Reaction score
- 8,537
Also, I know I shouldn't expect too much from Djogo, but shouldn't someone in college have at least some minimal use of his off hand.
You are right - on everything, always. Expecting Harvey to be a key player this year and help facilitate Brey's system is completely unreasonable. How could we ever expect that Harvey would be asked to do a lot this year and step up. Its not like he is highly rated and was the only guy taken in his class or had damn near guaranteed playing time in front of him from day one.
This season getting turned around starts and ends with Gibbs and Harvey. Expecting the frosh to make it happen is not only unreasonable but less than ideal for the future of the team.
I still have hope for Harvey. I've given up hope of much more growth from Gibbs. He is what he is. He's really at his best as a spot up shooter when the offense has good ball movement. He's a decent ball handler, but can't drive and finish. He's been put in a spot where he feels pressure to do too much and the results are not usually good.
I said it against Virginia and I'll say it again now: this is not a team playing but 5 individuals. This is so unlike the recent good Brey teams. I have seen more turnovers because of lazy passes than I have seen actual good extra passes to swing the ball to the open man. Something I really loved about Farrell was that even when he was turning the ball over it was mostly because he was attempting difficult passes to get his teammates the ball in a good position to score. Now most of the turnovers are either lazy passes being tipped/intercepted or players getting out of control on a dribble trying to get their shot. I could take the losses if we were at least playing our game but just getting beat, but we aren't even playing our game.
I said it against Virginia and I'll say it again now: this is not a team playing but 5 individuals. This is so unlike the recent good Brey teams. I have seen more turnovers because of lazy passes than I have seen actual good extra passes to swing the ball to the open man. Something I really loved about Farrell was that even when he was turning the ball over it was mostly because he was attempting difficult passes to get his teammates the ball in a good position to score. Now most of the turnovers are either lazy passes being tipped/intercepted or players getting out of control on a dribble trying to get their shot. I could take the losses if we were at least playing our game but just getting beat, but we aren't even playing our game.
What is our game? I mean, really?
Do you understand that this young/depleted team hasn't even had a chance to form an identity?
You foolishly compare them to "recent good Brey teams". Why? How is this team similar? They're much more young, they're dealing with injuries, they had a transfer.
Why compare them to the old team? You need to watch these games knowing that it's "not going to be pretty" and watch how they develop.
Everyone in America knew we were going to get killed this Saturday/Monday turnaround...And that was predicted before the loss of Rex, Elijah, and Robby... I'm curious to see how they look after 1) some good, needed rest and 2) a team that's less NBA than Virginia/Duke.
If you want to watch a "good Brey team" then you need to sit this year out (that goes to all you irrational posters). If you're interested in watching young guys learn how to take some punches and grow from it, then join me in some fun!
What's irrational about comparing this team to "recent good Brey teams"?First off, seriously, calling me irrational? What about what I said was irrational? I specifically said I could take the losses. I sat front row for every home game of our first year in the ACC and saw us get killed but it was okay because I saw the improvements that needed to be made being made.
My point of contention is that we do not seem to be making improvements but actually seem to be falling further away from what we need to do. Mooney became a good player but is now putting too much on himself offensively and is taking bad shots. Gibbs feels like he has to score every time and is forcing up shots he wouldn't normally take because of it.
So many people have talked about how he has regressed and to me its not even a comparison to how he was before because the way he is playing is so different. Its much easier to play an efficient game and put up good stats when you are getting open shots or even just getting the ball closer to the basket as opposed to how it is now where he takes fadeaway contested shots at the buzzer and get the ball in basically the same position four feet beyond the three point line every time.
As for what our game is, you are right in that I don't know. But what I do know is that the basis for all the different successful variations of his offense that Brey has run has been good passing. Whether it was the 4 around 1 drive and kick game of a few years ago or the pick and roll combos of DJ/Auguste & Farrell/Geben, each was built on a strong passing game that forced movement of the defense to open easy shots.
And you know what, maybe Brey figures it out this year. These guys are young and are basically toddlers compared to Brey's normal lineups. But my concern so far is that it feels like its heading in the wrong direction.
We all knew this was going to be a building year, but what good is a building year if all you build is bad play.
What's irrational about comparing this team to "recent good Brey teams"?
Do you really want me to breakdown how silly it is to compare players that were in HS to 3/4 year starters?
(also, I quit reading after your opening line because you clearly don't have a clear/competent for this type of a season)
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
"I'm worried about the process"Well you really should read before you respond. Seems pretty irrational not to do that.
My point, which I stated after you stopped reading I guess, is that even the bad and young teams with Brey got better because they improved in the system. They got more used to being in the flow of the offense which revolves around good passing to get players high percentage shots. Even when we didn't know exactly how to run the offense, that overall philosophy was still the same and the players got better at it over time. So far this year they are not only not improving but getting worse. You don't have to be a 3 or 4 year starter to improve. In fact, because they are so young and inexperienced the initial gains should be more obvious but so far they are absent. Just getting old won't solve these problems. Only getting old with good habits will work out. I am not worried about the results, I am worried about the process.
What's irrational about comparing this team to "recent good Brey teams"?
Do you really want me to breakdown how silly it is to compare players that were in HS to 3/4 year starters?
(also, I quit reading after your opening line because you clearly don't have a clear/competent for this type of a season)
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Additionally, to anyone drawing (or collecting data for) conclusions based on games against Virginia and Duke.
I feel bad for your lack of basketball iq.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
In what ways is southside being irrational or have no basketball i.q? We'd love for you to enlighten us on your own basketball i.q and where you got it from? He's brought up valid points about the team as a whole not showing a lot of improvements over the course of the season. Which is true. The only true players you can say that have showed improvements are Mooney and Goodwin, and Goodwin came back to earth last night. We continue to look lost on offense. Brey himself after the Virginia game that the team has had 68 practices this year. That's a lot of practice time to try and gel and it doesn't seem to be happening. It doesn't mean the players suck and should all transfer out and it doesn't mean Brey sucks and should be fired. The question is why and will we start to see the improvements we're so used to Brey teams making? I'd guess that we do make those improvements but we shall see.
Any realistic fan knows this season was a wash, NIT was the best thing they could hope for. And then you add the injuries? Breaking .500 is now the goal.
Next year they'll be a borderline tourney team, but in 2 years from now they'll make waves (with no injuries and such).
In what ways is southside being irrational or have no basketball i.q? We'd love for you to enlighten us on your own basketball i.q and where you got it from? He's brought up valid points about the team as a whole not showing a lot of improvements over the course of the season. Which is true. The only true players you can say that have showed improvements are Mooney and Goodwin, and Goodwin came back to earth last night. We continue to look lost on offense. Brey himself after the Virginia game that the team has had 68 practices this year. That's a lot of practice time to try and gel and it doesn't seem to be happening. It doesn't mean the players suck and should all transfer out and it doesn't mean Brey sucks and should be fired. The question is why and will we start to see the improvements we're so used to Brey teams making? I'd guess that we do make those improvements but we shall see.
Thank you for reinforcing me that there are still some level headed fans. Outside of my friends/family, I haven't had a meaningful ND basketball discussion since pre-Bonzie/Matt injuries last season.
Is it?
The best teams ND played OOC were OU, UCLA and Purdont. They went 1-2 and all three games were close. Before the last two games against perhaps 2 of the 3 best teams in the country, ND was neck and neck with NCSU and UNC and lost on the road to GT by 2 where they always struggle. By and large, GT and UCLA are nearly equivalents in my book.
So ND is playing quality teams night in and night out with a deleted roster full of players that, outside of Gibbs, has never logged these types of minutes. At the same time, they are essentially putting up the same performances they did OOC against similar teams, except they have a worse roster now.
I know UVA and Duke games were hard to watch. But to me, the next three games will tell me much more about this teams make up and progress. If they get blown out, I will share your concern.
I think this team can be better than simply a fringe-tourney team next year, but a lot of it comes down to not just guys developing, but a couple guys gaining a ton of confidence on offense. We need guys who are willing to take the shot.
Someone mentioned Gibbs taking a jump similar to Grant, but I just don't see it happening. Grant did a lot more offensively for ND than Gibbs has done. Grant could be a spot-up guy, a slasher and a floor general in varying capacities. Gibbs can't manage the floor. Hubb has shown flashes, but he's still very young and is getting knocked around out there. Physically overwhelmed.
Harvey is going to shine next year, calling it. People need to remember that this guy is 10-11 months removed from major surgery on his knee and he missed practically all of the offseason. That's a lot of time to practice and learn the system that he didn't get. But the guy appears to be getting his athleticism back and he can be a pretty lethal offensive weapon if he learns to play within Brey's system.
I don't think this team will be anything like the '15 squad. That team had so many guys who could were multi-faceted offensively. Grant and Jackson were a lethal floor command duo. They could both man point and could both slash. Hubb and Gibbs flash that kind of slashing ability, but they lack the floor general quality that those two had. I think Hubb can develop into that, not so sure about Gibbs. I really hate seeing Carmody go down, because I think he would've been that running mate with Hubb for the future. Gibbs would have had to up his game considerably or risk losing his starting spot.
Mooney doesn't get nearly enough credit. He's been a force inside for us, and I can only imagine how bad things would be without him. But he desperately needs help on the boards. He is getting ganged up by bigger, more athletic interior forwards. I felt horrible for him watching Barrett and Zion wreak havoc on him. It's hardly fair to expect him to hold things down against the two best players in the country without any help inside. Laz has to get so much better rebounding and add some physicality to his game.
Is it?
The best teams ND played OOC were OU, UCLA and Purdont.
I think the point southside made was where are improvements being made. Because what he sees are bad habits, with the continual bad passing and turnovers. That seems pretty level headed to me. I'd like to hear where you think the team is improving and what good habits they are actually making.
This season is obviously an anomaly so in no ways do I think Brey is on any sort of hot seat. However I'm a little concerned that the team struggles to get offensive rhythm and guard pick rolls. That's basic basketball stuff that seems hard at this time when they shouldn't after having 69 total practices.
As I stated earlier I do think this team has the chance to be good in 2 years making a run at a top 4 finish in the ACC if Brey works his magic like he usually does.
What does this post bring?This thread is hysterical. "Yea, we knew they'd be bad, so how low IQ of everyone to point out they're playing bad."
Can someone go ahead and create a "Notre Dame Men's Basketball 2020-2021" thread so we can clean up some of the stupid in this one?
Edit: Yea, time to step away from the insanity. I'm guessing we finish 5-5 (get one of either L'ville or Clemson). Hopefully over the last few games we see some growth from our young guys. But, without leaders, I can see this thing going down hill. Hopefully the thought of everyone being back keeps everyone engaged, not just trying to get the season over.
What does this post bring?
You got worked up about being blown about by two amazing teams, and losing some close games darn good teams.
You (and others) have shown overreaction to this seasons "downs", when the whole world knew it was coming (especially after injuries and the transfer). Overreacting like fools, comparing to past teams (who literally had different players, who are now elsewhere) has exposed the irrational, unrealistic fair weather fans.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
My biggest gripe with this season is that Brey put himself and this team in this situation. I know I've said it a million times and people are annoyed of it by now, but this is the result when your coach can't consistently recruit. So I refuse to give Brey a pass for these results, you could see it coming from miles away that Notre Dame would struggle with life after Bonzie. Mike Brey basically did nothing about it and you could tell that when he only added one player in the 2017 class.
I had this thought on Saturday when I watched a little bit of the UVA game. From a school perspective and recruiting perspective, Notre Dame and UVA are pretty similar IMO. Neither of them get one and done players and academics are important at the school. UVA had a stellar 2016 class that has really paid off; besides that class, UVA doesn't really light it up on the trail.
Is Tony Bennett that much better of a coach than Brey? I don't think so. They both develop their players very well. The difference, from what I see, is that Bennett has kept the cupboard full while Brey has struggled to fill out his recruiting classes (besides 2018). Its looking like that again in 2019, UVA has two commits while Brey is sitting on nothing.