...eats fast food at times, and may have gained some weight...
vs.
a little wobbly on her feet, history of fainting/falling
If we apply the Gerald Ford rule, There is nothing wrong with Hillary Clinton.
But I'm not sure WTF this article was trying to get at...it did not make me think Trump is less fit than Hillary. My eyes can confirm that isn't the case...his workload vs. hers would also tell me more.
Please don't tell me you believe that shit. That crap has all been debunked. It's Breitbart, Hannity, and other alt-right psychos pushing it, and it's embarrassing to the republican Party. It's the same as the birthers and the same as the Dems pushing that Bush and the Republicans were behind 9/11. I mean, Hannity was trying to push that the Secret Service had some sort of revitalization needle on hand in case Hilary fainted (LOL) and that he had the pictures to prove it, and it turned out it was just a friggin' small flashlight, per the secret service. Give me a break.
Trump's psychos as well as his campaign, once again, prove how stupid and unprofessional they are. They are sitting on the email scandal, and they could be hammering her day after day after day, and instead, they steer attention towards a bogus health claim, which by the way, opens up her campaign to question his ridiculous note from his doctor. I mean, what doctor in his right mind would proclaim his client to be more fit than any president ever? Or say that his client tested positive for everything (so, he tested positive for cancer, AIDS, syphilis...everything?)? Or says that he has great stamina without ANY numbers to back it up?
Why the hell open yourself up to that?
They were talking about this story on the radio today. Some pollster was on and he believes the numbers are skewed in Hillary's favor. Reason seen in this attached article. The people in the story are not polled for several reasons including it has been a long time they felt compelled to even vote.
Problem is:
A. the NY Post has been in bed with Trump from the beginning. It's like linking to Breitbart, or the Dems linking to the Huffington Post or Daily Kos. The slant is over-the-top.
B. Romney folks were saying the same thing (to a different degree) in '12. "The polls are skewed!" "The polls are rigged!" My dad was saying it all the time, and no matter what I told him (and I voted for Romney), it didn't matter...he was sure Romney would win easily. I could see if it was close that the NY Post’s argument could scare Dems. But it’s not even close right now. It’s a blow-out. Trump badly needs certain states and he’s losing by double digits in those states. States like Virginia (16 points!), Pennsylvania (10-12 pts), Colorado (10), Michigan (10)…he needs to flip one of those to even have a chance and it’s looking really bad.
And then you have states that shouldn’t be close like Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, even Iowa, that are all within the margin of error. In THOSE states, Trump better hope that your article is correct and those voters can push him over the top.
(And let’s not forget the people that are embarrassed to say they are voting for Hillary, and for people that never vote who are coming out to vote specifically against Trump. For some reason, Trump people don’t mention that those people are out there. But they are.)