2016 Presidential Horse Race

2016 Presidential Horse Race


  • Total voters
    183

GoldenDomer

preferred walk on
Messages
3,160
Reaction score
166
Every poll on social media I've seen where people vote anonymously, Trump wins. Very similar to Brexit. There's hope!
 

irishfan

Irish Hoops Mod
Messages
7,206
Reaction score
610
Is this a follow up to the articles Drudge linked to over the weekend with people helping HRC up the steps of a house with great difficulty and links to past health concern issues for her?

Ya, just people on 4chan and Reddit doing more digging. That stair picture is alarming. I would imagine the Trump camp will start pushing this issue behind the scenes.....or Trump might just start tweeting about it.


CpRu99TUIAAMW3B.jpg
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
5,055
Every poll on social media I've seen where people vote anonymously, Trump wins. Very similar to Brexit. There's hope!
This is very sad. I read articles and Facebook posts or reddit threads all the time where a vote for Trump is equivalent to outing yourself as a racist psychopathic moron. It's not that the Trump supporters are much better, but the majority of media I consume is certainly swayed against Trump. No progress can be made in this country if people will be belittled and insulted for having different opinions.

Hyper partisanship is terrible. Everyone should read Inferno and see what Dante has to say about the matter.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,709
Reaction score
6,016
Ya, just people on 4chan and Reddit doing more digging. That stair picture is alarming. I would imagine the Trump camp will start pushing this issue behind the scenes.....or Trump might just start tweeting about it.


CpRu99TUIAAMW3B.jpg

Lovely. This is what I like to see.
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,628
Reaction score
2,732
Ya, just people on 4chan and Reddit doing more digging. That stair picture is alarming. I would imagine the Trump camp will start pushing this issue behind the scenes.....or Trump might just start tweeting about it.


CpRu99TUIAAMW3B.jpg

Trump will take off his shirt and challenger her to feats of strength next to the Festivus Pole he brings to the first debate. Could you imagine the ratings! Hyuge! Big League!
 

GoIrish41

Paterfamilius
Messages
9,929
Reaction score
2,120
Ya, just people on 4chan and Reddit doing more digging. That stair picture is alarming. I would imagine the Trump camp will start pushing this issue behind the scenes.....or Trump might just start tweeting about it.


CpRu99TUIAAMW3B.jpg

Looks like she's drunk. lol
 

Irish Insanity

Well-known member
Messages
9,885
Reaction score
584
This is very sad. I read articles and Facebook posts or reddit threads all the time where a vote for Trump is equivalent to outing yourself as a racist psychopathic moron. It's not that the Trump supporters are much better, but the majority of media I consume is certainly swayed against Trump. No progress can be made in this country if people will be belittled and insulted for having different opinions.

Hyper partisanship is terrible. Everyone should read Inferno and see what Dante has to say about the matter.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk



Trump will take off his shirt and challenger her to feats of strength next to the Festivus Pole he brings to the first debate. Could you imagine the ratings! Hyuge! Big League!
I approve the above quoted messages.
 

irish1958

Príomh comhairleoir
Messages
1,039
Reaction score
112
This is very sad. I read articles and Facebook posts or reddit threads all the time where a vote for Trump is equivalent to outing yourself as a racist psychopathic moron. No progress can be made in this country if people will be belittled and insulted for having different opinions.
Even if the person uttering the opinions is really a racist narcissistic psychopath?
 

irishfan

Irish Hoops Mod
Messages
7,206
Reaction score
610
He needs to stick to the message that the money we use to re-settle refugees should be going to cities like Detroit. Good way for him to go "America first" and try and argue that his not simply being "racist."
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,014
Reaction score
5,055
How much additional revenue would that bring in?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,271
Reaction score
2,496
The way I'm reading it is that they will be losing their ability to get taxed as a long term capital gain and would instead be paying the standard rates? So a lot of these will go from 20% to 39%?

Will need Wiz to confirm...

Trick play.

Eliminate the carried interest tax.

Reduce the progressive income tax.

Trump looks like populist, going after those big bad investment firms, but then he gives those dudes a piece of the pie on the back side.

This is how I've interpreted it anyways. Correct if wrong.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,709
Reaction score
6,016
Trick play.

Eliminate the carried interest tax.

Reduce the progressive income tax.

Trump looks like populist, going after those big bad investment firms, but then he gives those dudes a piece of the pie on the back side.

This is how I've interpreted it anyways. Correct if wrong.

I'm not an accountant. Wiz will hopefully break it down before have a chance to try, as I'd probably screw it up.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,271
Reaction score
2,496
I'm not an accountant. Wiz will hopefully break it down before have a chance to try, as I'd probably screw it up.

Trumps team of advisers and donors are fund managers, etc. You really think he's gonna take that loophole away from them and not sweeten the pot for them another way?
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
The way I'm reading it is that they will be losing their ability to get taxed as a long term capital gain and would instead be paying the standard rates? So a lot of these will go from 20% to 39%?

Will need Wiz to confirm...
Pretty much. The current setup implies that a fund manager's income is the result of capital gains from invested assets. The argument to eliminate the loophole, for lack of a better term, is based on the idea that the fund manager's income is essentially a commission... labor income for his services managing the portfolio.

Trick play.

Eliminate the carried interest tax.

Reduce the progressive income tax.

Trump looks like populist, going after those big bad investment firms, but then he gives those dudes a piece of the pie on the back side.

This is how I've interpreted it anyways. Correct if wrong.
Right and wrong. Yes, part of the impact is offset by lower marginal rates on ordinary income, but the net impact is still revenue-positive (i.e. the hedge fund guys are paying more).

One thing that often gets lost in all this is that "hedge fund managers" can be a pretty nasty anti-Semitic dog whistle.

Trumps team of advisers and donors are fund managers, etc. You really think he's gonna take that loophole away from them and not sweeten the pot for them another way?
You can't say "fund managers, etc." so dismissively like that. The group to which carried interest applies is a very small percentage of financial professionals. Carried interest applies only to "general partners of private equity, venture capital, real estate, hedge funds and other investment vehicles organized as limited partnerships." Most people who fall into the category of "fund managers, etc." have nothing to do with carried interest.
 
Last edited:

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,271
Reaction score
2,496
Pretty much. The current setup implies that a fund manager's income is the result of capital gains from invested assets. The argument to eliminate the loophole, for lack of a better term, is based on the idea that the fund manager's income is essentially a commission... labor income for his services managing the portfolio.


Right and wrong. Yes, part of the impact is offset by lower marginal rates on ordinary income, but the net impact is still revenue-positive (i.e. the hedge fund guys are paying more).

One thing that often gets lost in all this is that "hedge fund managers" can be a pretty nasty anti-Semitic dog whistle.


You can't say "fund managers, etc." so dismissively like that. The group to which carried interest applies is a very small percentage of financial professionals. Carried interest applies only to "general partners of private equity, venture capital, real estate, hedge funds and other investment vehicles organized as limited partnerships." Most people who fall into the category of "fund managers, etc." have nothing to do with carried interest.

Apologies for the generalization.

The managers to which this all applies, still get access to the newly-proposed "pass through income for businesses" tax break, correct? Essentially, if (and when) tax returns are filed, a 15% rate on business income is what will be applied, right? Or did I misread something....?
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
Apologies for the generalization.

The managers to which this all applies, still get access to the newly-proposed "pass through income for businesses" tax break, correct? Essentially, if (and when) tax returns are filed, a 15% rate on business income is what will be applied, right? Or did I misread something....?
I haven't read the proposal in detail but, off the cuff:

No, I don't think so. These fund managers are organized into partnerships, and partnerships aren't considered "businesses" in the sense that there's no corporation to tax. Partners pay taxes on their partnership income as individuals at full individual income tax rates.

Wiz & Bleed Parnership - Wiz and Bleed each pay individual income taxes on their share of business income

Wiz & Bleed, Inc. - Wiz & Bleed, Inc. pays corporate tax. Then Wiz and Bleed pay capital gains taxes when dividends are distributed (i.e. double taxation, i.e. the reason we need to have 0% capital gains taxes OR eliminate the corporate income tax all together and tax all income as ordinary labor income)
 
Last edited:

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,271
Reaction score
2,496
I haven't read the proposal in detail but, off the cuff:

No, I don't think so. These fund managers are organized into partnerships, and partnerships aren't considered "businesses" in the sense that there's no corporation to tax. Partners pay taxes on their partnership income as individuals at full individual income tax rates.

Wiz & Bleed Parnership - Wiz and Bleed each pay individual income taxes on their share of business income

Wiz & Bleed, Inc. - Wiz & Bleed, Inc. pays corporate tax. Then Wiz and Bleed pay capital gains taxes when dividends are distributed.

Why is your name first? This is bullshit.

In all seriousness though, aren't we talking about some paperwork? What's to stop partnerships from changing to corporations?
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
Why is your name first? This is bullshit.

In all seriousness though, aren't we talking about some paperwork? What's to stop partnerships from changing to corporations?
Then they'd be paying taxes twice. Once on corporate profits and again on capital gains.

ETA: This is why we need to blow up the tax code. You're asking thoughtful questions and you seem like you think about these things seriously. I have two accounting degrees and half an MBA and it takes me a long time to untangle a lot of this. It's just about impossible for average Americans to understand.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
Why is your name first? This is bullshit.

In all seriousness though, aren't we talking about some paperwork? What's to stop partnerships from changing to corporations?

Partnerships generally don't offer liability protection from creditors.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,271
Reaction score
2,496
I just keep falling back on the fact that Trump just assembled a team of advisers who are friendly with Wall Street. Do you honestly think these guys are giving the go-ahead on ending the carried interest loophole, if they didn't think there was a way to get it back a different way?

Sorry, politicians who have billionaires in their ears, make me a cynic when it comes to this kind of stuff.
 

connor_in

Oh Yeeaah!!!
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
1,006
Even if the person uttering the opinions is really a racist narcissistic psychopath?

but wouldn't attacking them be bullying...but then again enforcing PC is basically bullying anyways, in their minds bullying the bullies, but still bullying...yes/no?
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,426
Reaction score
5,845
I just keep falling back on the fact that Trump just assembled a team of advisers who are friendly with Wall Street. Do you honestly think these guys are giving the go-ahead on ending the carried interest loophole, if they didn't think there was a way to get it back a different way?

Sorry, politicians who have billionaires in their ears, make me a cynic when it comes to this kind of stuff.

Remind me of that last candidate out of the convention (not Sanders) who wasn't cozy with wall street?

Wall Street has a consensus in the election and it is not the belligerent one who will rock markets with his outburst of the day.
 
Top