2013 Running Back Discussion

Kaneyoufeelit

Bowl Eligible
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
635
Assuming all of our current commits stick, we'll be at 8/8 for RB/ Z WR in 2013. We might even get to 9/8 if Folston jumps on board. I don't expect the staff to take more RBs next year unless a truly elite athlete wants in. Overloading at any one position creates problems.

Think Sony Michel fits that description? I do
 

Ironman8

Jaqen H'ghar
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
902
You never know. James Aldredge was a 5:s: bust for us at RB not too long ago.



Assuming all of our current commits stick, we'll be at 8/8 for RB/ Z WR in 2013. We might even get to 9/8 if Folston jumps on board. I don't expect the staff to take more RBs next year unless a truly elite athlete wants in. Overloading at any one position creates problems.

Labeling James a "5:s: bust" is unfair and really just inaccurate. James was easily a 5:s: RB before his knee injury, and was never anything like the player he was before it. It is a shame for him and ND that he never recovered to pre-injury form, but he should never have been kept as a 5:s: after his injury by any site.

I know several people who think Aldridge was a better prospect, pre-injury, than both Greg Bryant and Julius Jones. I didn't see enough of either James or Julius pre-injury to have an informed opinion on the matter, but I thought it was worth noting.
 

aubeirish

Well-known member
Messages
3,601
Reaction score
149
How is the O-line depth looking next? They will be the ones to dictate what any of these guys do anyways.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
Labeling James a "5:s: bust" is unfair and really just inaccurate. James was easily a 5:s: RB before his knee injury, and was never anything like the player he was before it. It is a shame for him and ND that he never recovered to pre-injury form, but he should never have been kept as a 5:s: after his injury by any site.

I know several people who think Aldridge was a better prospect, pre-injury, than both Greg Bryant and Julius Jones. I didn't see enough of either James or Julius pre-injury to have an informed opinion on the matter, but I thought it was worth noting.

I didn't intend to disparage Aldridge as a player. I only mentioned him to point out the absurdity of saying that, "X player will do big things for us, guaranteed."

How is the O-line depth looking next? They will be the ones to dictate what any of these guys do anyways.

That depends mostly on Hegarty, Z. Martin and Watt. If Hegarty can start at C for us, and Z. Martin and Watt return, then our OL may be even better next year.
 

Emcee77

latress on the men-jay
Messages
7,295
Reaction score
555
Think Sony Michel fits that description? I do

Well yeah, he's a top ten overall pick by 247's composite rankings. And we are also recruiting Bo Scarbrough, who is 16 in 247 composite rankings.

I would say yes, and so does Elijah Hood.

Yeah, him too, as a top-100-overall-caliber player. But anybody lower ranked than that is iffy at best, I'd think.
 
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
237
I didn't intend to disparage Aldridge as a player. I only mentioned him to point out the absurdity of saying that, "X player will do big things for us, if he stays healthy guaranteed." :eek:grin:

Ok. fixed it.
 

aubeirish

Well-known member
Messages
3,601
Reaction score
149
That depends mostly on Hegarty, Z. Martin and Watt. If Hegarty can start at C for us, and Z. Martin and Watt return, then our OL may be even better next year.

That sounds good. Let's hope for the best here. A good O-line is the most important thing for this offense to be a force next year. We know all the other positions will have a lot of talent.
 

gkautz10

Active member
Messages
711
Reaction score
35
I didn't intend to disparage Aldridge as a player. I only mentioned him to point out the absurdity of saying that, "X player will do big things for us, guaranteed."



That depends mostly on Hegarty, Z. Martin and Watt. If Hegarty can start at C for us, and Z. Martin and Watt return, then our OL may be even better next year.

I think we are comparing apples to oranges here. We are comparing a 5 star player developed under Weis to a 5 star player being developed under Kelly. Not in the same ballpark if you ask me.
 

Ironman8

Jaqen H'ghar
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
902
I think we are comparing apples to oranges here. We are comparing a 5 star player developed under Weis to a 5 star player being developed under Kelly. Not in the same ballpark if you ask me.

Aldridge was not a 5:s: player post injury! Wouldn't be for any coach. That is the issue with that argument.

But Whiskey is right. There are "busts" for every coach. It's why depth is so important, and why you can never relax for a second in recruiting.
 

gkautz10

Active member
Messages
711
Reaction score
35
Aldridge was not a 5:s: player post injury! Wouldn't be for any coach. That is the issue with that argument.

But Whiskey is right. There are "busts" for every coach. It's why depth is so important, and why you can never relax for a second in recruiting.

He showed his ability in his senior season with Kelly. I think him being a 5 star player post injury is up for some debate. Not saying your wrong, I just don't think it's cut and dry.
 

Ironman8

Jaqen H'ghar
Messages
11,652
Reaction score
902
He showed his ability in his senior season with Kelly. I think him being a 5 star player post injury is up for some debate. Not saying your wrong, I just don't think it's cut and dry.

Look at his pre-injury tape and then any clip of him after. He is not the same player.

He become a solid player his senior year after having to change who he was as a player, but still wasn't half as explosive as he was.

Verify that with anyone who followed his recruitment.
 

KPENN

Well-known member
Staff member
Messages
13,017
Reaction score
11,343
He showed his ability in his senior season with Kelly. I think him being a 5 star player post injury is up for some debate. Not saying your wrong, I just don't think it's cut and dry.

Aldridge never played for Kelly.
 
G

Grahambo

Guest
BK is known for turning low star players into studs. It's getting to the point whoever BK accepts is okay in my book because he sees things that most of us just don't.
 

gkautz10

Active member
Messages
711
Reaction score
35
BK is known for turning low star players into studs. It's getting to the point whoever BK accepts is okay in my book because he sees things that most of us just don't.

This is what I was essentially getting at. While at Cincinnati, Kelly never had this type of talent and he developed those 2 and 3 star players into football players. I am excited to see what he can do once he gets his hands on 5 stars for a few years.
 

Patulski

www.ndnation.com
Messages
878
Reaction score
138
Anyone think George Atkinson can be a starter? or is his lack of pass protection skills and most importantly lack of ball security make him too risky of a road to go down?

Atkinson handled the ball 72 times this year in rushes, kickoff returns and passes caught. How many times did he fumble?

I wonder if he'll skip track this year and decide to work on getting bigger and stronger.

I still think he's going to be a big star, and a future high NFL draft pick. Too much speed to ignore. All he needs is more power.
 

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,971
Reaction score
6,459
What does Coach want in a back?

a]. ability to see and hit the hole downhill;
b]. ability to run sharp routes and catch the ball in the intermediary area;
c]. enough power to get the tough yards, and rip arm tackles;
d]. ball security;
e]. ability to understand defenses so as to recognize blitzes;
f]. discipline and courage to actually make the block.

A good exercise on this is to compare Theo and Cierre in your minds on these criteria. Then compare GAIII. Then, even given the paucity of actual data [but since is boring time-wasting addictive behavior, who cares?], compare these RB candidates for next year. You will have noticed that "blinding speed" does not occur on the list. That is because Kelly wants maximum control conservative "system-wins" offense, not spectacular High Risk/ High Reward offense. Theo and Cierre had plenty of speed as far as Coach was concerned.

That skill set is why I see Cam McDaniel as an outstanding fit for what the Kelly system requires. If people like Will Mahone and Amir Carlisle and Greg Bryant prove, when we finally see them, to be "the whole package and then some", I will be ecstatic as that will mean we have one He!l of a bunch of backs. If GAIII learns how to do those things in that list that he does NOT do well yet, similar ecstasy. There was a very good set of reasons that Theo and Cierre played so much and George didn't. It wasn't some "social" thing like honoring old greybeards. They were significantly better players for Coach's philosophy, and Theo close to perfect.
 

Patulski

www.ndnation.com
Messages
878
Reaction score
138
You will have noticed that "blinding speed" does not occur on the list.

That's your list, not Kelly's. Furthermore, nobody knows what Kelly's offense is going to look like next year. Kelly doesn't appear to me to be a guy who is stuck on one offensive philosophy. He appears to tailor his system to his personnel.
 

tommyIRISH23

Well-known member
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
156
That's your list, not Kelly's. Furthermore, nobody knows what Kelly's offense is going to look like next year. Kelly doesn't appear to me to be a guy who is stuck on one offensive philosophy. He appears to tailor his system to his personnel.

I agree. We have been slowed down offensively bc of our QB's. I think Kelly is developing his own identity; spread+power. I think we are still another season away from where Kelly envisions the offense being. In 2014 our offense will be very hard to stop.
 
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
237
What does Coach want in a back?

a]. ability to see and hit the hole downhill;
b]. ability to run sharp routes and catch the ball in the intermediary area;
c]. enough power to get the tough yards, and rip arm tackles;
d]. ball security;
e]. ability to understand defenses so as to recognize blitzes;
f]. discipline and courage to actually make the block.

A good exercise on this is to compare Theo and Cierre in your minds on these criteria. Then compare GAIII. Then, even given the paucity of actual data [but since is boring time-wasting addictive behavior, who cares?], compare these RB candidates for next year. You will have noticed that "blinding speed" does not occur on the list. That is because Kelly wants maximum control conservative "system-wins" offense, not spectacular High Risk/ High Reward offense. Theo and Cierre had plenty of speed as far as Coach was concerned.

That skill set is why I see Cam McDaniel as an outstanding fit for what the Kelly system requires. If people like Will Mahone and Amir Carlisle and Greg Bryant prove, when we finally see them, to be "the whole package and then some", I will be ecstatic as that will mean we have one He!l of a bunch of backs. If GAIII learns how to do those things in that list that he does NOT do well yet, similar ecstasy. There was a very good set of reasons that Theo and Cierre played so much and George didn't. It wasn't some "social" thing like honoring old greybeards. They were significantly better players for Coach's philosophy, and Theo close to perfect.


A. Cam does this great. natural RB.
B. 2 catches this year
C. Runs with power, but he is smallest Rb. IMO this is his biggest knock. The biggest hits this year on a Rb for this team have been on him and that was in 1 game. Can he handle it all season?
D. Holds the ball properly. +1
E. Don't remember if we ever passed when he was in the game
F. Same as E

Lastly, it's pretty obvious Cam is by far the more natural RB yet GA3 was called up first each time. How do we explain that?

GA3 51 carries
Cam 23 carries (11 against Miami)
 

tommyIRISH23

Well-known member
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
156
1. Carlisle
2. Bryant
3. McDaniel
4. Atkinson


Atkinson/Carlisle
McDaniel (I think McDaniel is going to see a significant amount of playing time filling in for a few different roles. He is strong, works hard, and is tough as nails. That cant be ignored)
Mahone
 

tommyIRISH23

Well-known member
Messages
1,629
Reaction score
156
A. Cam does this great. natural RB.
B. 2 catches this year
C. Runs with power, but he is smallest Rb. IMO this is his biggest knock. The biggest hits this year on a Rb for this team have been on him and that was in 1 game. Can he handle it all season?
D. Holds the ball properly. +1
E. Don't remember if we ever passed when he was in the game
F. Same as E

Lastly, it's pretty obvious Cam is by far the more natural RB yet GA3 was called up first each time. How do we explain that?

GA3 51 carries
Cam 23 carries (11 against Miami)


GA3 is a homerun threat
 

Kaneyoufeelit

Bowl Eligible
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
635
Mele on ISD predicts that Bryant wins the job and rushes for over 1,000. GAIII over 700, Folston and Cam over 400. Carlisle sees limited action out of the backfield but gets carries out of the slot on sweeps and reverses. Predicts he also catches around 25 passes.
 

GoldenIsThyFame

Well-known member
Messages
10,899
Reaction score
789
Mele on ISD predicts that Bryant wins the job and rushes for over 1,000. GAIII over 700, Folston and Cam over 400. Carlisle sees limited action out of the backfield but gets carries out of the slot on sweeps and reverses. Predicts he also catches around 25 passes.

I would call that a bold prediction
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
Mele on ISD predicts that Bryant wins the job and rushes for over 1,000. GAIII over 700, Folston and Cam over 400. Carlisle sees limited action out of the backfield but gets carries out of the slot on sweeps and reverses. Predicts he also catches around 25 passes.

Take out Folston/Cam and my guess would be the exact opposite of this. ha
 

GoldenIsThyFame

Well-known member
Messages
10,899
Reaction score
789
The freshman rushing record is 786 yards by D Walk. The previous record stood for 30 years...
 
Top