If more people watched NCIS than the game, I’m not calling it one of the two biggest games of the year. I don’t care what the rankings say.
You're using "TV ratings" as an equivalent for "amount people paid attention"...
...
...you do know that TV ratings reflect the average viewership throughout the game and people
CHANGED THE CHANNEL BECAUSE ND WAS KILLING THEM, right? And there were other good games to flip to? Do you or do you not understand how live ratings work?
Every single college football show (national and otherwise) for the next week did multiple segments about that game. It was talked about a LOT more before and after the fact than than Georgia beating barely-ranked ND in week 2. The ND-Georgia game got a tepid "oh, well Georgia went to South Bend and barely beat an ND team that was unranked to start the year."
Please stop pushing BS about that USC game "not being a big game." You know that's not true. And if you want to measure actual public engagement in a game, simply look at the tweets and other social media postings surrounding and during Georgia-ND vs USC-ND. There was WAY more engagement during and surrounding the USC game.
So in summary:
1. Game against arch-rival
2. Higher rankings for both teams
3. More media and social engagement (during and surrounding the game)
4. Less TV ratings because people switched the channel to other good games