- Messages
- 27,770
- Reaction score
- 10,153
Which coaches? There's lots of bodies for linebackers, which IS one of the reasons 3-4 has been popular in recent years (Aside from the success Alabama has had), but it's hard to find a kid with the size and strength to pull off a true 3-4 NT. Even the average ones get a mountain of offers. While they don't have to tie up multiple linemen every down, they do need to from time to time. Again, I know it's Wikipedia, but it's spot on here:
This. If we planned on moving to a 3-4 base again Ewell would probably be a good DE in the mold of Tuitt, but not an NT.
That said, after all this discussion, I don't see us moving to a 3-4 base going forward. We'll still pull it out for certain games as it sees fit, Navy being one probably as long as Jarron is here to tie up the A gaps...it allows us some extra speed to control the edge and disrupt the option. We used it well against Miami because Miami's OL wasn't very good, as seen by Jarron's complete dominance. Against teams with better OLs I think we'll see us to continue to use our base 4-3 unless we find a way to entice big, smart immovable objects to come here to play NT regularly.
Since BVG has left, we have played A LOT of 3-4. On top of that, Kelly has said multiple times that he actually prefers that, in most scenarios. He wants to be multiple but the 3-4 fits our personnel. That comes from the HC, himself. Just what it is.