ND's Talking Heads ... The good, bad & ugly

pumpdog20

Well-known member
Messages
4,741
Reaction score
3,153
What did you guys think of the II pod scoffing at the idea that the 2026 team is more talented on paper entering the season than 2024 or 2025?

I was shocked they were so dismissive and they thought 2024 was the best.

Reminder, this is viewing it from ENTERING THE SEASON. Off the top of my head:

QB - 2026 with Carr + Denbrock returning. Leonard missed all of spring and was a transfer.

RB - 2024

WR - 2026? Faison and Greathouse were literally huge pieces on that 2024 team and now they’re older and better. Mylan + Porter + Gilbert + Burress = hopefully better than Beaux Collins, Kris Mitchell and Jaden Harrison.

TE - 2024. I loved Mitchell Evans but he was coming off injury

OL - no idea. Need OMM to chime in here

Interior DL - 2024 with Mills and Cross

Edge - 2026 I think there is a much higher expectation with experienced Traore and Young than unknown Botehlo, Burnham and Junior at the time. Also, Traore played a ton before injury and Young played quite a bit in 2024 as is.

Linebackers - 2026. All of these guys played in 2024 and now are older and better.

Secondary - 2026 and not even close. Love Benjamin Morrison and X Watts, but we didn’t know what Schuler and Gray would be back in 2024. We know exactly what 2026’s holds and the depth is unmatched.
I'll take what we thought we were getting from the 2025 WRs: (Greathouse coming off two monster CFP games, steady Faison, and an excitable Fields). 2026 has way too much projection for me to pick it over 2025 personally.

I think I'm also going 2025 running backs. Same crew as 2024 but a year older and experience.
 

ColinKSU

Well-known member
Messages
4,647
Reaction score
6,163
If you want your excitement to turn to depression, listen to Sampson and Fortuna's recent episode. 30 minutes of bitching about Freeman, the portal, and anything else under the sun.
“A guy who wishes he was covering Premiere League and a guy who wishes anyone would pay him to cover anything exclusively discuss a topic they both hate!”
 

FWIrish4

Well-known member
Messages
1,408
Reaction score
2,833
I'll take what we thought we were getting from the 2025 WRs: (Greathouse coming off two monster CFP games, steady Faison, and an excitable Fields). 2026 has way too much projection for me to pick it over 2025 personally.

I think I'm also going 2025 running backs. Same crew as 2024 but a year older and experience.
I agree. Sorry, I should have noted I was only comparing 2024 and 2026 as they stated 2024 was the best pre-season wise.
 

IrishFanForever23

Well-known member
Messages
1,216
Reaction score
595
Hasn't this already happened? I'm not say that is wrong, but in what ways is ND behind now? Not in 2005. Now.

Yes there is still work to do. But like what is he saying we need to do?
Support staff is still way too small, scheduling over the last 5-6 years has done ND no favors starting on the road, and the new football facility took too long to build and will it have what they need, and why so long for undergrads being allowed. Basically, ND used to be the leader in these types of things, where now they fall behind and have to play catchup.
 

IrishTusker

Well-known member
Messages
1,706
Reaction score
1,771
Support staff is still way too small, scheduling over the last 5-6 years has done ND no favors starting on the road, and the new football facility took too long to build and will it have what they need, and why so long for undergrads being allowed. Basically, ND used to be the leader in these types of things, where now they fall behind and have to play catchup.
The scheduling this year was definitely bad. But I don't know of a future (or, for that matter, past) schedule where we play our two toughest opponents first. I don't know who signed off on that.
 

arrowryan

Well-known member
Messages
14,715
Reaction score
8,915
Support staff is still way too small, scheduling over the last 5-6 years has done ND no favors starting on the road, and the new football facility took too long to build and will it have what they need, and why so long for undergrads being allowed. Basically, ND used to be the leader in these types of things, where now they fall behind and have to play catchup.

This stuff used to be true, but has zero correlation with IU winning a championship. Which is probably what caused him to write the article. IU is struggling worse in these categories, if I had to guess.
 

irishff1014

Well-known member
Messages
26,509
Reaction score
9,284
This stuff used to be true, but has zero correlation with IU winning a championship. Which is probably what caused him to write the article. IU is struggling worse in these categories, if I had to guess.

People keep saying this won’t be an issue, it’s clearly an issue if ND can’t win a natty and Indiana can.
 

arrowryan

Well-known member
Messages
14,715
Reaction score
8,915
People keep saying this won’t be an issue, it’s clearly an issue if ND can’t win a natty and Indiana can.

An issue in what way? Is it an issue for Texas, USC, Oregon, and every other team who hasn’t won yet? Idk what you see in Notre Dame’s program and think they “can’t” win a championship.

IU had a great team and took advantage of a down year in CFB.
 

IrishFanForever23

Well-known member
Messages
1,216
Reaction score
595
This stuff used to be true, but has zero correlation with IU winning a championship. Which is probably what caused him to write the article. IU is struggling worse in these categories, if I had to guess.
Actually the opposite in terms of support staff. He made a comment about IU having 5 staffers watching opposing teams warmup and gathering data. His thinking is you had 5 people dedicated to just that means you have a larger support staff which I’m not sure I agree with.
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,313
Reaction score
13,086
context-soy.png
 
Top