- Messages
- 16,041
- Reaction score
- 5,491
I wonder how many people are hoping pot is legalized so the can vaporize it or eat it?
Many, but the ones who do that stuff are probably the "potheads". haha
I wonder how many people are hoping pot is legalized so the can vaporize it or eat it?
LOL now this is something I could see Congress wanting to be part of....the dumbing down of pot.
They could form committees, hold hearings and then develop a whole new division within the Government. After several billion dollars in studies, deliberation and hearings we'd have:
The FBDM..Federal Bureau of Dumb Marijuana
...basically exactly like marijuana in terms of chemcial reaction on the brain and psychadelic experience, except perhaps more potent and lasts for a shorter period of time (so I'm told)...
But ask any regular "smoker" and none will tell you it's as "good" as the real thing, not to mention it tends to be more expensive and doesn't last as long.
Which of course, leads me to wonder: if Spice is supposedly inferior in quality, more expensive, and possibly harmful and untested, why would people buy it over real weed? The only answer can only be either (a) these consumers don't have the same access to real weed as they do Spice, or (b) they're willing to settle because they're afraid of the legality, or both.
Thus, any case that, at least as far as the U.S. is concerned, legalization and increased availability of marijuana will actually decrease consumption has a very, very tough road to hoe. Because the clear consmer demand for legal cannabinoids says otherwise, as does simple microeconomics (i.e., reduced price = greater quantity demanded).
I wonder how many people are hoping pot is legalized so the can vaporize it or eat it?
I like how that article acts like prescription drugs don't cause ~20,000 deaths annually anyway. Hell you can list off the "side effects" of many pharmaceutical drugs and get the same "damn that sounds rough" reaction.
Report: Prescription Drug Deaths Skyrocket | Fox News
NO ONE is saying it is a healthy exercise. But it is less harmful than cigarettes and alcohol. It is hypocritical to have cigarettes and alcohol legal if marijuana isn't
Also, that article talked about SMOKING marijuana and its effects on the lungs. What if I use a vaporizer? No smoke. What if I eat it via a brownie??! Definitely no smoke.
Is there really a far greater demand than the demand that is currently being met though? The way you've portrayed it, particularly prior to this last post, is that the floodgates will open once legalization occurs. You haven't provided me with enough evidence to suggest that there's a huge suppressed market for marijuana out there. I just see a black market.
Additionally, part of your formula includes reduction of price. Why would we assume that it would become cheaper? The government could surely regulate and tax it. We've seen how effectively they've increased the price of tobacco. Would marijuana be different?
I think there is a considerable demand. But look at alcohol, when it was legalized usage went up, but because it isn't addictive (productive) people--90% of the population--only drink when they can without impacting their lives. That is to say that you drink on a Friday night and not a Tuesday night, for obvious reasons.
So what more than likely would happen is a certain amount of people who smoked in college (just as they drank themselves silly and yet magically were able to stop when they entered the real world) would partake in smoking on the weekend or whatnot. Using marijuana =/= becoming a pothead. So an increase in usage nationally =/= an increase in potheads. People are, believe it or not, pretty damn responsible. The people who would use marijuana and drive or use marijuana and go to work are doing it regardless of its legality.
As addressed earlier, marijuana is not a manufactured product. Cigarettes and beer are, thus you can control the price.
For example let's say the government wanted to tax tomatoes at such a ridiculous rate that it was on par with alcohol/tobacco, what would be the result? You wouldn't see the usage of tomatoes decrease per se, you'd see people simply grow their own.
If you tried to tax marijuana a comparable amount to alcohol/tobacco, people would simply grow it and avoid the tax. Making cigarettes is hard (and people are addicted and will not wait for the harvest haha), as is beer/wine/liquor, so the average person simply puts up with the tax.
The real tax revenue is off the in the industry that hemp would bring. Products, and jobs.
Another unpopular guy in the room here. I'm really against it and there's a reason why it's been illegal all this time.
One of my best friends started running around with the wrong crowd and starting smoking weed at least 3 times a day. He was the oldest of all of his siblings and it was really sad to see the impact that it had on them because they looked up to him so much like any sibling would do with an older sibling.
From my view, smoking weed can really bring out the immaturity in people. After awhile, people need to grow up at some point and care about things that really matter. Instead of taking time doing this stupid ****, people should be giving back to their communities and think about how their actions affect younger generations.
"The Price of Prisons," states that the cost of incarcerating one inmate in Fiscal 2010 was $37,307 per year. "In states like Connecticut, Washington state, New York, it's anywhere from $50,000 to $60,000," he said.
And don't get me going on gambling, especially poker treated like child trafficking.
...Even if it was a wash or if demand increased marginally, which I'll accept for the time being arguendo, what are your compelling reasons to prevent adults from making their own decisions as to what they choose to ingest on their own time?
...
I want to preface this by saying, I think of myself as average intelligence, I dont tend to get into discussions with people such as: (Buster, Bob D, Whiskey, and Acamp). I rather just sit back and listen, so I learn. I dont enjoy getting into political issues either, mainly because the American political system confuses the hell out of me. But, legalization of Pot is interesting to me. I'm 20, and have been around Pot for the last couple of years. I personally dont smoke anymore, mainly because I rather spend (weekend) money on alcohol in college. However, I have numerous freinds that do. The one main thing that I want to harp on is that the Drug can change you. The idea of the Gateway theory is in my humble opinion a real thing. I had numerous friends in high school, that were "potheads", but once that high got old to them they moved on to stronger hallucinogen drugs such as (LSD, shrooms...etc). It bothers me because these kids, as Im sure many of you have come across. Are not always low life's, lazy people before the drugs. For me to be satisfied with the legalization of pot, is that there has to be strong education at the middle school/high school level. Just like there is for sex, cigarettes, and alcohol, that although the drug may be harmless at first there can be problems if you over do it. TO Much of any drug is a problem.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Statistics show that users of harder drugs make up only a small fraction of the figure of marijuana users. The facts are that the overwhelming majority of marijuana users will not use harder drugs regularly, or for very long, if at all.
Now, that isn't to say that users of harder drugs don't do marijuana beforehand. That is also true.
But couldn't one argue that prohibition increases the contact with the dealers of harder drugs? It most certainly does.
Also, current laws did not stop your friends, thus they horribly ineffective.
Tell me about it. We have to take a boat from Little River out into open ocean waters to gamble down here. Ridiculous. They have even gotten rid of "video games."
Sometimes people cant get out of their own way.
Ready, Set, Go (Irish!!!)!
Think of home grown weed as a generic, OTC version of Aspirin, Motrin and Aleve.
I look forward to a generic Lipitor.
The war on marijuana was initiated when a "threat" was perceived to the white kids who dug jazz. Smokin' rope was fine when it was primarily a "black thing." The real push came when white, suburban, anti-establishment hippies and anti-war "types" took up its use. These neer-do-wells were enamored with the evolutionary, disruptive Rock and Roll.
Ready, Set, Go (Irish!!!)! I'll try my damnedest to keep sentences short. All I can offer are vMunchies. vBurgers, vShakes, vPizza and the like.
Marijuana should never have been criminalized. There should be no need to "legalize" it. Regulate, control and tax it like alcohol, tobacco and milk.
Uncontrolled opium use is illegal. Uncontrolled cocaine use is illegal. There are medical uses, though, for their derivatives. Botox is a sanctioned use of a deadly substance.
The war on marijuana was initiated when a "threat" was perceived to the white kids who dug jazz. Smokin' rope was fine when it was primarily a "black thing." The real push came when white, suburban, anti-establishment hippies and anti-war "types" took up its use. These neer-do-wells were enamored with the evolutionary, disruptive Rock and Roll.
Think of home grown weed as a generic, OTC version of Aspirin, Motrin and Aleve.
I look forward to a generic Lipitor.