SaltyND24
Well-known member
- Messages
- 2,165
- Reaction score
- 484
Rios, Westerkamp, McNamara, Ekanem, and Andrades come to mind...they all had strong initial and continuing interest but were told (in so many words) that we were waiting on others and that limited class size was a potential problem. Now we have none of them.
The minute a recruit is looking around, I think we should be signing up the next.
I see what you're getting at but I have a few responses:
1) Rios committed before Darby de-committed and we were still trying to make moves with Poole and I believe there was talk about Howard...So do we take Rios as soon as he shows interest and ultimately kill possibly going after two "higher" ranked prospects
2) With Westerkamp, we pursued him and he eventually chose to honor his committment to Nebraska...Also we had Greenberry, Brown, Ferguson, Russell and were still going after agholor and neal...
3)McNamara wasn't a high priority since Eifert decided to come back...we also have Koyack and will pursue a class of '13 TE Top Prospect in Adam Brennamen
4) Don't understand the Ekanem situation, I'll give you that one
5) For the Andrades situation, it's similar to the Westerkamp situation...
There is much that can be said about our coaching staff, I get that...but also, as a fans...we have to figure out what it is we want...Do we go ahead to grab up (lesser, yet solid) recruits early at the expense of being in play for elite prospects or do we leave ourselves open? I just feel that if we let some of these guys commit and as a result weren't in play with the Neal's and Armstead's of the world that there would be a lot of complaints as well...Idk, color me confused....