'12 CA DT/DE Arik Armstead (Oregon Verbal)

rtrn2glory

Well-known member
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
6,451
Adding Arik would surpass easing the loss of Decker and be and upgrade. Ya that's right I'm saying Decker is gone and we get the Armstead brothers now!

is taylor done for sure or just your hunch?

i'd say landing the armsteads is less than 25% imo
 

woolybug25

#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
3,018
Reallllllllllllllllllllly doubt SC will allow Armond to talk to us or transfer here, which probably means you're looking at Auburn as chief competition now for Arik.

FYI, go read this article on how schools can still restrain kids who have graduated if they're dicks. However.... with the fact that Armond sat out most (all?) of this year and is not medically cleared.... he might be exempt from this rule. I don't know though.

I would be shocked if Kiffin did what St John's coach did. College football recruiting is followed much more than college bball, and if Kiffin did that, he would be giving every coach in America ammo to recruit against him. Furthermore, I think you hit the nail on the head with the medical issue. I don't think that they will have a choice of where he goes because USC is letting him go, not the other way around. But I could easily be wrong about that.

Finally, I wonder if Armond could call his bluff and tell Kiffin that if he didn't let him go to Notre Dame, then he is going to stay at USC and use one of his scholarships to do so.
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
Finally, I wonder if Armond could call his bluff and tell Kiffin that if he didn't let him go to Notre Dame, then he is going to stay at USC and use one of his scholarships to do so.

I have little doubt that Kiffin would happily waste a scholarship to keep the nation's #1 recruit away from us.
 

SirStrutsAlot

New member
Messages
381
Reaction score
14
Finally, I wonder if Armond could call his bluff and tell Kiffin that if he didn't let him go to Notre Dame, then he is going to stay at USC and use one of his scholarships to do so.



Good Thoughts!
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
If I'm reading this correctly, Armond may not be able to transfer to Arkansas or Auburn due to the SEC policy on Grad Transfers that took effect on Oct. 1st.
Russell Wilson's transfer to Wisconsin result of best NCAA rule - Andy Staples - SI.com

The SEC would disagree. After Oct. 1, the league won't allow any more graduate transfer exceptions for players with only one year of eligibility remaining. (Players such as Glennon, who has two years of eligibility remaining, would still be eligible to transfer and play immediately.) The SEC rescinded the exceptions after it got embarrassed when quarterback Jeremiah Masoli, who had been booted from Oregon's team, used the rule to transfer and play right away at Ole Miss.

Read more: Russell Wilson's transfer to Wisconsin result of best NCAA rule - Andy Staples - SI.com
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995

SirStrutsAlot

New member
Messages
381
Reaction score
14
Armstead not announcing at Army Bowl


just shows that he is waiting on his brother's problems with USC to be cleared up before he makes his decision. Irish fans have to feel good about that, i know i do!
 

simets99

Member
Messages
44
Reaction score
5
possibilities:
1.we pass on KLM for a 5th and add armond to get Arik
2. They both go to auburn.
I think the second scenario is much more likely, but don't know how Arik fits in with auburn basketball

If the staff was planning to "redshirt" Arik his freshman year than his scholarship would count against the basketball team that first year and they could use the scholarship on Armond.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
Ooo... good point.... but did Armond redshirt? If he did he might actually have 2 years left. I wish I knew more about the rules in play here, but sadly I do not. I guess we'll know soon enough (2 weeks).

Armond played in 2008, 2009, and 2010. This year he is using a redshirt. He has one year of eligibility left.
 

Te'o4Heisman

Well-known member
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
2,616
possibilities:
1.we pass on KLM for a 5th and add armond to get Arik
2. They both go to auburn.
I think the second scenario is much more likely, but don't know how Arik fits in with auburn basketball

No way on God's green earth that the staff does not bring KLM back for a 5th year. I do not care who the recruit is. The argument could easily be made that before he got hurt KLM was our best and most consistent player on defense. Kelly is on the win now plan, he's not going to pass on bringing back our best DL with another year of eligiblity for a high school player who may or may not ever become half of what KLM has proven he is at the FBS level.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
We are not in any kind of scholarship bind that would prevent us from taking both guys. There will likely be a transfer or two (there is every year from every program) and you have guys like Cwynar who we would all loved to have back for a 5th but could be dropped in favor of a #1 recruit.

On top of that, we have 5 open spots right now assuming KLM, Cave, Slaughter, Cwynar for 5ths and we only look to have 2 (maaaaybe 3) people commit before Arik would be making his EE decision known. AND, heaven forbid, there is always the chance of losing a currently committed player like Decker or Darby.

Anyways, the important thing to take away from the above is that we really aren't super tight on scholarships at this juncture.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
I would think it would be a tough sell to the ND locker room to say that the reason we didn't bring back one of the 5th year guys was because we needed to offer Armond in order to get Arik.
 

SirStrutsAlot

New member
Messages
381
Reaction score
14
I would think it would be a tough sell to the ND locker room to say that the reason we didn't bring back one of the 5th year guys was because we needed to offer Armond in order to get Arik.


let's not forget that nfl scouts had Armond graded out as a 2nd -3rd rd pick last year..
 

Domina Nostra

Well-known member
Messages
6,251
Reaction score
1,388
I would think it would be a tough sell to the ND locker room to say that the reason we didn't bring back one of the 5th year guys was because we needed to offer Armond in order to get Arik.

That's a good point, but I think all expectations should be tempered after year four. No one would blame the individual player for going pro and putting himself in front of the program at that point, and no one should fault the coach for putting the program above the individual at that point either.
 

NDinL.A.

New member
Messages
8,121
Reaction score
1,734
I would think it would be a tough sell to the ND locker room to say that the reason we didn't bring back one of the 5th year guys was because we needed to offer Armond in order to get Arik.

That would be true if Armond sucked. He doesn't. That kid can flat out play. There's a reason USC fans have been clamoring for him to be cleared despite scholarship reductions, and it's not just b/c of his brother. They wanted him to play THIS year...
 

Anchorman

New member
Messages
658
Reaction score
60
Do we even know if ND would clear him? If SC didn't, that tells me there are still questions.
 

Anchorman

New member
Messages
658
Reaction score
60
Who was the OL who transferred to Florida because we wouldn't clear him? (concussions)

My point is 'perfectly healthy' is relative, and I'd expect we'd have pretty stringent standards in terms of player safety/health as apparently USC does.
 

Sweetness34

New member
Messages
494
Reaction score
15
Who was the OL who transferred to Florida because we wouldn't clear him? (concussions)

My point is 'perfectly healthy' is relative, and I'd expect we'd have pretty stringent standards in terms of player safety/health as apparently USC does.

Dan Wenger
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
Who was the OL who transferred to Florida because we wouldn't clear him? (concussions)

My point is 'perfectly healthy' is relative, and I'd expect we'd have pretty stringent standards in terms of player safety/health as apparently USC does.

Why even ask the question if you don't want to hear the answer? Armond has already been cleared by a half dozen different independent doctors. This has literally nothing to do with Wenger. It has everything to do with USC's scholarship situation and the fact that beyond Armond they still will need to cut roughly 7 more guys before they open camp in the fall.
 

Rack Em

Community Bod
Messages
7,089
Reaction score
2,727
Dan Wenger

"Perfectly healthy" is relative. But Danny had, I think, 3-4 concussions in his time at ND. His injuries occurred around the Declan Sullivan tragedy too. Keep that in mind...

I think we've got a ways to go with Arik, but a visit from Armond would go a long way
 

ND NYC

New member
Messages
3,571
Reaction score
209
Why even ask the question if you don't want to hear the answer? Armond has already been cleared by a half dozen different independent doctors. This has literally nothing to do with Wenger. It has everything to do with USC's scholarship situation and the fact that beyond Armond they still will need to cut roughly 7 more guys before they open camp in the fall.

not questioning the veracity of your assertion rather im just curious how you came up with a specific number of guys they need to "cut".

in other words how about a quick analysis of usc and their scholorship restrictions vs what they have in house now factoring in their current recruting class?

have it on my desk by 5pm LOL
 

CanadalovesND

Well-known member
Messages
6,525
Reaction score
5,946
Armond Armstead considering.........ND?

Armond Armstead considering.........ND?

Armond Armstead considering a transfer from USC | CollegeFootballTalk

Armstead mentioned Notre Dame, Arkansas and Auburn as transfer possibilities, and could be visiting those institutions at some point in the future.

I dont know about you, but I found this very surprising for alot of reasons. First off, I dont think there's ever been a player who played four years at USC only to come to ND his last year. In fact, I cant think of the last time there was a senior transfer to ND. Secondly, keep this in mind. Because of the Jeremiah Masoli fiasco at Ole Miss, SEC teams cant accept 5th year senior transfers. He mentioned Auburn and Arkansas as potential transfer locations, but they cant accept him to play football for them.

Also, if he comes to ND (if he's cleared to play), you have to wonder what his role will be. He started his junior year at USC, and produced some good numbers: 43 tackles, 6.5 tackles for loss, and 3 sacks. As of right now, we are losing Ethan Johnson to graduation. That leaves a starting position open. Now, Tuitt and Lynch played well filing in for Johnson and playing a role in the rotation, considering that they were only true freshman. Can we arguably tell Tuitt or Lynch to take a backseat or limit what they expect for a year if Armstead proves that he can be a vital contributor to our defense? Thats up for you to decide.

You also have to look at this from a recruiting standpoint. Our DL is already pretty deep, do we add even more depth to it? I dont care, but some underclassmen could take this the wrong way, but I seriously doubt that. Also, Armond is Arik Armstead's older brother. Now, Arik is supposed to enroll early, and has about one week left to decide where he wants to go. The addition of the older Armstead could drastically improve our chances of landing the younger Armstead.

Anyways, whats your thoughts of this developing Armond Armstead situation?
 
Top