I was responding to this specifically:
This struck me as a mocking mischaracterization of the argument we had over Greenberry. I never implied that the recruiting services are worthless, or that all of our recruits are systemically underrated. I simply think Greenberry's continuing dominance of 7ON tourneys against elite talent is a better indicator of potential than measurables + high school production; that's all.
If that's not what you were getting at, then please excuse my grumpiness.
I just think we use the ranking when convenient. For instance, when I said that I'd take DGB over any WR in the class because he was the unanimous #1 receiver by every recruiting site, you made an argument (and a good one at that) about why we put too much faith into the recruiting services...
Then, the next day when zsteele15 made the thread about Ben Koyak's potential, your sole argument was listing his ratings by every recruiting site (which were very high) and then saying something sarcastic (as to, yeah, he's pretty good).
I don't want to argue with you. I didn't say anything bad about either Marshall. We need RBs and I'd be glad to get either one. I was just pointing out the RKG treatment we usually give our recruits. And it's usually accurate.
I'm not going to waste this thread over an argument. PM me if you want to talk about it.
And I don't mean to come off as a jerk, we're all on the same side here.