G
GBdomer
Guest
We are in the mix for Ifeadi but we dont lead.
Ever see the campus? Or the women? Mix in a top University that isn't ND (an alternative) . . .
Ever see the campus? Or the women? Mix in a top University that isn't ND (an alternative) . . .
The few times that I have been on Stanford's campus was as a visiting professor, and I found it rather "stuffy". Admittedly a prof's viewpoint is probably of little relevance in these matters, but maybe "stuffiness" extends more deeply.[/QUOTE]
I've attended a number of ND – Stanford games in Palo Alto over the last two decades. I can't speak to the campus (from the point of view of a visiting professor) as being "stuffy" or not, but the antics of the band and those who staged the half time shows were the antithesis of stuffy.
Poorly, if not pathetically conceived and staged in terms of true wit and cognizance, they were lacking. "Stuffy" they were not.
Ever see the campus? Or the women? Mix in a top University that isn't ND (an alternative) . . .
There's a strong inverse relationship between a school's admission standards and the attractiveness of its female students.
God giveth with one hand, and taketh away with the other. Perhaps there is justice after all.
Anything new that is at all relevant? Anything?
When there's news, someone will post it. If an off-topic conversation gets out of hand, a mod will move it.
If you're offended by the lack of hard-hitting recruitment info on the last couple pages, feel free to message a mod about it.
**** ... guess questions can't be asked around here fancy pants!
****
Legitimate questions are welcome. "Anything new???" is not. We have several members who are all over the pay sites and twitter; if there's news, it gets posted immediately.
IrishEnvy is easily the best moderated message board I've ever used. If information is getting posted in the wrong thread or forum, it gets moved by a mod pretty quickly. So there's also no need for passive-aggressive posts about "relevance".
Well I must admit that I've posted something like that before (numerous times really) but only on threads that have sulked to the bottom of the forums. Sometimes our big poster guys just kinda skip over them.
I wouldn't have said anything if I hadn't seen NDinLA post the same sort of reply to "Anything new???" posts several times. Add on the crack about "relevance", and it hit two of my pet peeves.
Anything new that is at all relevant? Anything?
Stanford leads how is that for news.
... dshans, Remember the Stanford bands Irish rendition? If I were Kelly, I would have the football team run through their band this year, and cleat as many musicians as they fell down as possible.
Stanford Report, October 15, 1997
Band punished for mocking Notre Dame: 10/97
'Tasteless performance' earns ban for Band
The Stanford Band has been prohibited from performing at football games against the University of Notre Dame until 2000 in the wake of shows at an Oct. 4 intercollegiate match that have been blasted as racist and insulting.
Irish and Catholic groups criticized the maverick band's pre-game and half-time performances, which included a parody of the Irish potato famine and a band member dressed as a Catholic cardinal.
President Gerhard Casper offered Stanford's apologies to Notre Dame. Athletic Director Ted Leland said in a statement issued Oct. 6: "I apologize for the tasteless performance by the Stanford Band at last Saturday's football game with Notre Dame. In their sophomoric attempt at humor, the band crossed the line from funny to obnoxious and offensive."
But band members say that their halftime show, titled, "These Irish, Why Must They Fight?" was misinterpreted, partly because of an unclear fieldshow script. "For this, we apologize," the band said in a long statement posted on its web page. "Its misinterpretation as an assault on the Irish seems obvious in retrospect, but did not occur to any of our censors. We erred in judgment, and we apologize."
The band also said that claims that the scrips referred to the Irish as "stinkin' drunks" were false.
The statement said that the concept behind the show was not to insult Irish people but to ridicule Notre Dame's leprechaun mascot, which the band called racist. "We think it absurd that Notre Dame can claim a whole ethnicity as its mascot, and further characterize this ethnicity as belligerent: the Fighting Irish," the statement read. "Further, to represent the Irish, Notre Dame uses a leprechaun. Most Irish people we know are not, in fact, leprechauns."
The Athletic Department also said it would "revamp its standing procedure to review Band scripts." It had apparently approved the Oct. 4 script, which led to what it later called an "unacceptable show." SR