johnsben
Member
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 21
Nobody compares with CMart, nobody, except Jalen Brown robbing a store for some gum and smokes while at Michigan doing the Fab 5 run. Crazy!
I hope you mean Jalen Rose.
Nobody compares with CMart, nobody, except Jalen Brown robbing a store for some gum and smokes while at Michigan doing the Fab 5 run. Crazy!
I may be wrong, but I believe transfers (who are released) simply sit a year but are on scholarship and can practice. So it would make no difference. Transfers who are NOT released I believe have to pay their own way at any FBS school for a year or transfer to a lower level to receive a schollie, but can practice regardless. So in any scenario he would be allowed to practice but he would not be allowed to receive a schollie if not released... making the transfer very improbable if Jimbo decided to say "**** you Irish."
Then again, why would Jimbo want to "eat" a sholarship just to f**k the Irish anyway, who isn't on their schedule for future years? I would think that IF Prestwood wanted to decommit and go back to his original commitment and that team (ND) wasn't on F$U schedule for 3-4 yrs., then I would think Jimbo would want that opportunity to fill the void w/ another potential recruit. Not sure, just saying ....
As an EE did he sign his LOI yet?
It's not. LOI aren't needed it's just a device to protect students athletes of the promise that they get a scholarship that's binding. They aren't a necessity and there are other agreements that can be made it's just not binding and a coach/university can deny it at any point before enrollment. That's the downside of not signing the LOI the upside of not signing the LOI is that the player can leave without having to be released or have the restrictions of where they can and can't go as in the same conference.It is moderately interesting that neither Rivals nor Scout has him listed as having "signed" his LOI.
It's not. LOI aren't needed it's just a device to protect students athletes of the promise that they get a scholarship that's binding. They aren't a necessity and there are other agreements that can be made it's just not binding and a coach/university can deny it at any point before enrollment. That's the downside of not signing the LOI the upside of not signing the LOI is that the player can leave without having to be released or have the restrictions of where they can and can't go as in the same conference.
To be honest I'm surprised the elite kids that don't have any academic issues still go the LOI route.
By the way once your on campus as an enrolled student your bound to that University so the LOI is worthless hence why Rivals and Scout don't have him signing as the LOI isn't needed.
Same goes for our 5 EE's no LOI needed.
It's not. LOI aren't needed it's just a device to protect students athletes of the promise that they get a scholarship that's binding. They aren't a necessity and there are other agreements that can be made it's just not binding and a coach/university can deny it at any point before enrollment. That's the downside of not signing the LOI the upside of not signing the LOI is that the player can leave without having to be released or have the restrictions of where they can and can't go as in the same conference.
To be honest I'm surprised the elite kids that don't have any academic issues still go the LOI route.
By the way once your on campus as an enrolled student your bound to that University so the LOI is worthless hence why Rivals and Scout don't have him signing as the LOI isn't needed.
Same goes for our 5 EE's no LOI needed.
karma is a biTch!
says who?well, well, he is transferring.
But.....what if he ends up coming to ND?karma is a biTch!
ISD has it up on their twitter page.says who?
But.....what if he ends up coming to ND?
Watch it John Titan!! Her Karma will run over your Dogma.
4HL on II says he is transferring in....