You know the committee is not immune to public criticism so if it’s close w/ a ton of 10-2 teams, I could see them getting to the point where they use ND as a sacrifical lamb to prove their lack of bias as perceived by idiot fans who think ND is getting undue love.10-2 ND is not going to be left out.
I'm pretty sure ND will be in but they could get left out if enough goes wrong. End of the day, would have no one to blame but themselves for losing games.10-2 ND is not going to be left out.
I don't think Bama winning the SEC matters to ND. Only in the sense of seeding. Georgia, Bama, A&M, Ole Miss, OK are in even if Bama wins the SEC (or even loses the SECCG). OK is out if they get upset and SEC only gets 4.I think the committee finds a way to include ND assuming they take care of business this week. But there are chaos situations that make it really uncomfortable, i.e. BYU winning the B12 and Bama winning the SEC.
I could also see them doing the opposite and saying, we're the committee, we were appointed to make this decision, and we feel like ND is one of the 12 best teams, who is on a 10-game dominating win streak, and has one of the best shots to win the NC. Sorry, they are in.You know the committee is not immune to public criticism so if it’s close w/ a ton of 10-2 teams, I could see them getting to the point where they use ND as a sacrifical lamb to prove their lack of bias as perceived by idiot fans who think ND is getting undue love.
Bama is just a problem if we get some other unfortunate outcomes. Like if Bama wins the SEC AND BYU beats Texas Tech, we're not in an enviable spot. We would then need the committee to kick Texas Tech out (which is punishing Tech for losing a conference championship game, and that is something they say they won't do).I don't think Bama winning the SEC matters to ND. Only in the sense of seeding. Georgia, Bama, A&M, Ole Miss, OK are in even if Bama wins the SEC (or even loses the SECCG). OK is out if they get upset and SEC only gets 4.
BYU winning the B12 though, that's troublesome. But I could still see the committee choosing ND over a 2 loss TT team, even if that "upsets the conference championship loser apple cart".
I really wish the committee would use that as a talking point when asked about ND. When all is said and done, they can point out that ND has played the same number of FBS opponents as most, if not all; the other CFP ranked teams. It’s a glorified scrimmage & is used as a bye which was clearly on display this past weekend. While FBS teams increased their scholarship limit to 105, I haven’t hear of FCS programs increasing much beyond their 63 scholarships. When it was 85 vs 63, that was a full level of backups that the FBS had over the FCS schools. That’s crucial for depth…especially in mid-November. It’s why you rarely see a competitive game between P4 & FCS in mid-NovI could also see them doing the opposite and saying, we're the committee, we were appointed to make this decision, and we feel like ND is one of the 12 best teams, who is on a 10-game dominating win streak, and has one of the best shots to win the NC. Sorry, they are in.
And, the rest of you 10-2 teams (oh btw, who have all played one FCS team), that lost to trash teams along the way, one of you is out.
I don’t think it’s impossible but I do think it would require some really weird shit in the conference championship games. They’re going to want us in and will find a way to get us in if there’s space.10-2 ND is not going to be left out.
I think most fans (especially subway alums) would agree with this. It would take someone like Bevacqua really pleading a case w/ the Admin to get Navy off the schedule entirely. Maybe he could get them to negotiate only playing the opener & then in years where that doesn’t work, take a break. Notice how many SEC/B1G schedule Navy despite casuals who claim their a cupcake….I can’t think of any. They know Navy is a pain in the ass. Not that they can’t beat them but the way preparation disrupts the pre-season & in-season practice schedule. Like you said, despite all the extra work to prepare for them, beating them nets zero other than a W which could be achieved against a traditional G6/P4 doormat.Also, it’s just time to get Navy off our schedule. They’re as good as they’ll ever be this year and we still get no credit for the win. The tradition is great or whatever but not worth the risk of injury and waste of a week prepping for an option attack if there’s no upside.
All of these except for Tennessee are garbageShould Vanderbilt beat Tennessee this week, what's the likelihood of them getting in? Losses are 14-30 at Alabama (a lot closer than the score indicated) and 31-34 at Texas. They'd log wins against VT, South Carolina, LSU, Mizzou, Auburn, Kentucky, and Tennessee.
The Navy game is literally all downside.Also, it’s just time to get Navy off our schedule. They’re as good as they’ll ever be this year and we still get no credit for the win. The tradition is great or whatever but not worth the risk of injury and waste of a week prepping for an option attack if there’s no upside.
To be fair we also get no credit for having beaten Purdue, Arkansas, Boise and like half the ACC. Apparently the only opponents that aren't creampuffs are the ones ranked in the Top 20, unless you are in the SEC in which case Kentucky and Mississippi State and Auburn are Murderers Row.I love tradition as much as anyone. I respect the concept of "giving your word." But, I think the debt has been repaid. If they want to play every 3-5 years, I'm all for it. But, I'd love to replace them when a generic B1G team for all of the points already mentioned.
I think the comparison in the scenario above really comes down to ND compared to a two loss TX tech.When push comes to shove after the conference championship games, if the dominoes fall against ND.....I'm hopeful that the committee says "which are the best at large teams who can actually compete in the championship?" If it's ND vs Tx Tech or ND vs Miami or ND vs BYU or ND vs Ole Miss (without Lane Kiffin) for the final spot, I would hope that the committee realizes (both from the eye test and from the models) that ND has the best possibility of actually winning 4 consecutive games.
Very backdoor. They need to win, have Virginia Tech beat Virginia, and either Wake beat Duke or NC State beat UNC. Or all have Cal, Wake, and NCST all win.Backdoor chance Miami slips into the ACC CCG which they would hopefully win and remove any chance of 2 bid ACC.
Backdoor chance Miami slips into the ACC CCG which they would hopefully win and remove any chance of 2 bid ACC.
In all these, it really comes down to "best" vs. "most deserving."When push comes to shove after the conference championship games, if the dominoes fall against ND.....I'm hopeful that the committee says "which are the best at large teams who can actually compete in the championship?" If it's ND vs Tx Tech or ND vs Miami or ND vs BYU or ND vs Ole Miss (without Lane Kiffin) for the final spot, I would hope that the committee realizes (both from the eye test and from the models) that ND has the best possibility of actually winning 4 consecutive games.
The past month has taught me Miami fans and their media people don't deserve joy or happiness.I would really like Miami to lose to Pitt so that they shut up.
Edit - brevityBackdoor chance Miami slips into the ACC CCG which they would hopefully win and remove any chance of 2 bid ACC.
Vegas agrees by a very slim margin.Pitt has gonna get shit pumped by Miami.
I think Washington over Oregon is most likely upset. Followed by Miss State if Ole Miss just no shows.
I don’t know how LSU manages to score an offensive point to help us.
Edit - brevity
Miami makes the ACC Championship Game if:
– Miami beats Pitt, AND
– At least TWO of these happen:
1) Duke loses to Wake Forest
2) SMU loses to Cal
3) Virginia loses to Virginia Tech
If that happens, Miami is in Charlotte. Which opponent they get depends on WHICH two (or all three) of Duke/SMU/Virginia lose.