I’d like to agree but I would also like them out period. If they beat NW, Iowa and Oregon down the stretch they would get a big bump, and if we win but dont play well…USC is not challenging us for a spot no matter what.
The mopping versions will spread it out for you……..Better models should be able to pick that shit up for what they cost
Correct. Honestly, the Raiders are probably still a more popular football team in LA than the Trojans.They don't care. I maintain they primarily care about the Dodgers and Lakers in LA. Dodgers season is totally over and the Lakers are out of town tonight. They have a good team this year against a good opponent. Doesn't matter. LA doesn't care about USC football.
Great gif. Top stuff.
So incredibly Lincoln Riley. Bush league.
So incredibly Lincoln Riley. Bush league.
I'm going to get all sorts of shit for this but I don't care.
I'm so FUCKING sick and tired of hearing Tyler Buchner I could throw up. The guy has left 10 times and came back. He fucking sucks and he's like been here for 9 years it seems like.
Get the fuck out.
I don’t think my reaction is quite as visceral as yours, but the A&M game this year definitely tainted my overall perception of him.Buchner = wasted scholarship spot.
Prove me wrong.
I will wait
Indeed we did. The game day roster has to show the correct numbers. Northwestern didn’t check it, admitted it postgame.Didn’t we do that last year with Buchner?
I'm not sure about this year, but last year he was a walk-on.Buchner = wasted scholarship spot.
Prove me wrong.
I will wait
Buchner was 26 last year because Chris Salerno also was
It’s why the fake FG versus Ga Tech worked
That guys track record isn’t great but if we do play them again, it better be in campus. A neutral game against USC is a slap in the face imoThe 247 poster that said Minchey won the job (and II effectively backed up as reputable insider) said the series got a two year extension. On campus not neutral.
I can't figure out the would want to give up a home game and play in Vegas. Riley bitches about travel, then they might move the game? Makes no sense.That guys track record isn’t great but if we do play them again, it better be in campus. A neutral game against USC is a slap in the face imo
I'm laughing because you said "TB" instead of the name. 🤣The only difference is TB was 26 all year, not just for one game.
Right! Screw him. Go call on Tenn or Oregon to see if they want to get something going.I can't figure out the would want to give up a home game and play in Vegas. Riley bitches about travel, then they might move the game? Makes no sense.
The II pod touched on it briefly, basically a close neutral site game not counting as one of their home games would be good for some sort of home game requirement they’re mindful of. Not sure if it was a B1G Ten requirement or what.I can't figure out the would want to give up a home game and play in Vegas. Riley bitches about travel, then they might move the game? Makes no sense.
The II pod touched on it briefly, basically a close neutral site game not counting as one of their home games would be good for some sort of home game requirement they’re mindful of. Not sure if it was a B1G Ten requirement or what.
Its fun how USC seems to think that traveling to Notre Dame is a disadvantage for USC, but does not seem to think that Notre Dame traveling to USC is a disadvantage for Notre Dame.I thought the basic idea was that USC can't win in South Bend, so adding a neutral site game in the rotation once every 3 years, over the course of the series, reduces the number of times they play in South Bend by 33%.
This whole charade (month the game is played, neutral site games, possibly canceling the series) is based on USC's being afraid of ND's home field advantage, which USC's home games do not match.