'26 IA TE Evan Jacobson (Offer)

allenm5333

Well-known member
Messages
2,543
Reaction score
2,526
Agreed, Jack Larsen has 4 years left I think he's going to be good, James Flanigan is gonna be a stud he will play this year I wouldn't be surprised if he breaks out. If I'm Notre Dame I'd go after Driver and Loken or Brown
I am not high on Larsen. This year and Flanigan is a great trio. Add 2 studs next year. 5 TEs in 3 years is good!
 

NDFAN2008

Well-known member
Messages
7,330
Reaction score
5,655
I have not looked around but it Jacobson doesn’t want to be in a 3 TE class, A&M has had 2 TEs committed for a few weeks before ND did.
I'm guessing he goes to Iowa State they didn't take a TE last year and haven't yet this year.
 

rtrn2glory

Well-known member
Messages
16,163
Reaction score
6,450
Taking/pushing for Jacobson verses going all in for Premer is the type of recruiting that takes this team from very good to elite. Maybe not a fair position to say that on as Kelly never had trouble recruiting TEs, but the staff won't settle for even top 200 guys if they think they can get :s::s::s::s::s:
Power hour had a good take on this on Monday. If they take a 3rd or could create a log jam and scare away any 27s. Better to just go for 2 next year again which helps you land one of the elite guys next year instead of looking at the depth chart and being scared away
 

IAIrish

The Dude Abides
Messages
1,661
Reaction score
2,052
Power hour had a good take on this on Monday. If they take a 3rd or could create a log jam and scare away any 27s. Better to just go for 2 next year again which helps you land one of the elite guys next year instead of looking at the depth chart and being scared away

Great point. Add to it that they worked out most of those top 27's at Irish Invasion so they have a good read on the caliber of talent in that class/ position.
 

Ricochet

Well-known member
Messages
1,375
Reaction score
295
He was one of the standouts from the Spring Game
Larson could be very good but he's one that needs to be catered to. Doesn't have the size of the traditional TE nor the speed of the modern MOVE TE. However what he has is pretty good quickness to go with Elite hands and route running. Ideally IMO he would be pass catching FB if teams actually used FB's.
 

NDFAN2008

Well-known member
Messages
7,330
Reaction score
5,655
Larson could be very good but he's one that needs to be catered to. Doesn't have the size of the traditional TE nor the speed of the modern MOVE TE. However what he has is pretty good quickness to go with Elite hands and route running. Ideally IMO he would be pass catching FB if teams actually used FB's.
He's 6'3 250, Both Mcbribe and Bowers the top 2 receiving TE's in NFL last year are 6'4, the 3rd is Kittle who is 6'4 Jonnu Smith is 6'3 so to say he doesn't have the size is kinda funny.
 

IRISHbluehen

Well-known member
Messages
681
Reaction score
1,250
He's 6'3 250, Both Mcbribe and Bowers the top 2 receiving TE's in NFL last year are 6'4, the 3rd is Kittle who is 6'4 Jonnu Smith is 6'3 so to say he doesn't have the size is kinda funny.
Those dudes are on a whole other level athletically. Larson could certainly be a good/decent TE, but he is not Bowers/Jonnu. They are exceptions to the rule
 

Rocketman84

Well-known member
Messages
2,425
Reaction score
1,203
and it would be stupid bc they could get 2 more dudes next year
Not really, they wanted 2 last year and go only signed 1. It's best to look at recruiting in 2 year cycles and 3 over 2 years isn't a huge number if your target was 4. Im fine with the 3 they have over 2, but they don't turn down the target number if they can reach it unless they value some prospects in the next class that much over him.
 

NDpendent

Well-known member
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
6,337
Not really, they wanted 2 last year and go only signed 1. It's best to look at recruiting in 2 year cycles and 3 over 2 years isn't a huge number if your target was 4. Im fine with the 3 they have over 2, but they don't turn down the target number if they can reach it unless they value some prospects in the next class that much over him.
Unless something changed with Dembrock then this isn't true. It's been previously reported that he wants the TE room smaller than what ND had previously and only wants around 6 total on the roster and the aim would be 3 every two years.
 

Rocketman84

Well-known member
Messages
2,425
Reaction score
1,203
Unless something changed with Dembrock then this isn't true. It's been previously reported that he wants the TE room smaller than what ND had previously and only wants around 6 total on the roster and the aim would be 3 every two years.
He does want a slightly smaller room which is what he will have with attrition in the the room. 6 total every 3 years is an average number not a max, but 4 over 2 years or even 5 over 2 years still puts you on that pace for 6-7 over 3 years. There's always an exception made in recruiting and in this case he would take 3 and if it was a year where he only needed 1 and had one committed but the #1 TE decided he wanted to come you don't take him or do you make an exception?
 

Ricochet

Well-known member
Messages
1,375
Reaction score
295
Those dudes are on a whole other level athletically. Larson could certainly be a good/decent TE, but he is not Bowers/Jonnu. They are exceptions to the rule
Exactly. I'm a fan of Larsen but he's on the short side for a TE. Maybe he's a legit 6'3 now but even then it's only height it's all about length these days. That 250 lbs is new to him, can he move the same as before or is he slower? The point I was trying to make and that you pointed out that this a guys are the exception whereas Larsen is not tall or long, didn't have the size ie weight last season and is only has solid speed and athleticism.

However has has Elite skills with his hands and route running. There is a place for him to be very valuable for ND but he's always going to be the underrated guy that's going to come up clutch when given his shot. He will be the forgotten guy with the other weapons on the field and will take advantage of it.

I guess the best way I can describe the kind of player he is by describing what I think of his equivalent is in basketball. So to me Larsen is the SG/SF who can't create is own shot, so some games he doesn't have many points but then there games when he goes off for 28 or 33 points because the team is moving the extremely well and he get a ton of open looks that he didn't need to create and he took advantage of that with the skill set that he does have.
 

Free Manera

Well-known member
Messages
2,949
Reaction score
3,547
Is Jacobson basically the only remaining chip to fall? I know a Vallejo flip is always possible or some other flip but as far as uncommitted guys this is it right?
 
Top