And then?
Would Hamas surrendering end the ethnic cleansing? I have my doubts considering the settler movement (many of whom like a lot of Israelis are not actually from the region) is objectively insane/racist, have been the root cause of the ongoing conflict since they assassinated Rabin and want to annex Syria as well.
I think most leaders of the security state in Israel and those involved in the settler movement (who are basically in control of the government at this point) clearly understand that if Hamas surrenders Gaza will be overrun with settlers and the Palestinians will be expelled forever from that area in fairly short order. In all likelihood this would then increase the speed and intensity with which the West Bank is ethnically cleansed and then the settlers would turn their focus to Syria. I mean the western powers have largely given Israel carte blanche to carry all this out up this point so why would the settlers think they would be restrained after the last Palestinian is driven from Gaza?
Also, I can’t imagine that Muslims from around the world would just site and watch if the al-Aqsa masque at Haram al-Sharif was destroyed, which is something that right wingers in Israel aligned with the settler movement have been advocating for and or attempting to do for several decades now.
Would any of that make Israel more secure and Jews around the globe safer? I personally don’t think so.
Thanks for the post.
It comes down to this.
There comes a time where the people you govern and claim to represent are suffering so badly by a war that you started, that you must capitulate to your enemy and end it. The only example that I can think of where a government took its entire people down with the ship with them was Nazi germany. Even the Japanese capitulated after two atomic bombs.
I don't believe that Israel would forcibly remove all of the gazans if Hamas surrendered. I do believe that they would allow people to leave on their own volition. This is what terrifies everybody and it's wrong and selfish.
Before the war, 1 in 3 wanted to leave. Now it's 1 in 2. Do you believe that they should be forced to live there and not go anywhere else? Is anyone else on earth forced to stay in one small area?
Forget ethnic cleansing and the 'resistance'. Israel won the Civil War 77 years ago. They have soundly defeated every nation in the region since. Multiple times. They have over 100 nuclear missiles that can be fired on land and with their Dolphin Subs. They aren't going anywhere. Ever. They even have doomsday plans in case the world comes at them with said nuclear missles.
This isn't South africa. This isn't Algeria. This isn't Vietnam or whatever noble cause leftists want to romanticize and to have hope for toppling or boycotting out of existence.
So let's say they all left and started new lives somewhere. Some sad, some angry, some relieved and some hopeful. And then let's say Israel did annex it. Would that really be worse than what has happened to them this last year and a half? Even worse than before the war when 1 in 3 wanted to leave?