Police State USA

Sea Turtle

Slow and steady wins the race
Messages
5,643
Reaction score
3,486
Sad and unacceptable. Training has to be better, but I also want to know where his caretakers were in all this? Some neighbor calls in that a drunk guy is wielding a knife? Shouldn't a caretaker been able to let someone know he's autistic and bullets were unnecessary? A tazer could definitely been implemented first. We've seen this happen before, reminds me of the boy sitting in the road that got shot, although that was far worse because I don't even think he had a weapon or was aggressive.

Also, the family didn't speak English so the police officers have no idea what they are yelling. Just a terrible situation.
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
Also, the family didn't speak English
Basis for this?...one story mentioned the 911 caller saying something that he wasn't sure if they were speaking English..but I haven't seen anything that the family isn't bilingual. The sister and aunt have been giving statements to the AP. The aunt was interview by local TV and was speaking English.

I haven't seen an interview with the sister who was in the yard with the victim, but she was quoted in a story as well and they didn't mention an interpreter.
 
Last edited:

Sea Turtle

Slow and steady wins the race
Messages
5,643
Reaction score
3,486
Basis for this?...one story mentioned the 911 caller saying something that he wasn't sure if they were speaking English..but I haven't seen anything that the family isn't bilingual. The sister and aunt have been giving statements to the AP. The aunt was interview by local TV and was speaking English.

I haven't seen an interview with the sister who was in the yard with the victim, but she was quoted in a story as well and they didn't mention an interpreter.

The 911 caller said they weren't speaking English. But you're right, that doesn't mean they couldn't. I wasn't able to hear any voices from the family in the video.

The police were responding to a call about a young, possibly drunk man chasing a couple around their yard with a knife. This is why they exited their vehicle guns drawn. That obviously sounds very serious.

But it still shouldn't have happened. Just awful.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Sad update to the story. I have family who have been cops and I'm not a refund the police person, but we have to come up with better training programs for police officers and do more to hold the bad ones accountable so things like this doesn't happen

 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,159

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,380


Oh shit! I never heard about this. We used to live 3 minutes from the Olde Towne Apartments before we built our new house. Had to get out of Middletown, it's not a nice place and only got worse over the 10 years we lived there. All those houses were brand new surrounding Maple Park where we used to live, a school used to be there and was torn down. The rest of the neighborhood was pretty old and run down, and the further south you went the more drugs and violence you'd run into. Huge opioid problem there. On two occasions I'd be in line at the McDonalds on Verity in Middletown and drivers + passengers would be strung out in the queue, employees banging on their windows but they're passed out and unresponsive in the car. Needless to say, the straw that broke the camel's back was a bunch of kids drove down Webber one night during 4th of July week and they randomly shot at houses on our road. Our neighbor had a bullet lodged in their front porch post. Our AC got hit, bullet went right through it, through the siding, through my pantry, couldn't find it though. It was time to GTFO of that shithole.

Screenshot 2025-04-22 015046.png
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,581
Reaction score
20,031
Oh shit! I never heard about this. We used to live 3 minutes from the Olde Towne Apartments before we built our new house. Had to get out of Middletown, it's not a nice place and only got worse over the 10 years we lived there. All those houses were brand new surrounding Maple Park where we used to live, a school used to be there and was torn down. The rest of the neighborhood was pretty old and run down, and the further south you went the more drugs and violence you'd run into. Huge opioid problem there. On two occasions I'd be in line at the McDonalds on Verity in Middletown and drivers + passengers would be strung out in the queue, employees banging on their windows but they're passed out and unresponsive in the car. Needless to say, the straw that broke the camel's back was a bunch of kids drove down Webber one night during 4th of July week and they randomly shot at houses on our road. Our neighbor had a bullet lodged in their front porch post. Our AC got hit, bullet went right through it, through the siding, through my pantry, couldn't find it though. It was time to GTFO of that shithole.
Wow, you are lucky no one got hit. I'd move as well.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,581
Reaction score
20,031

Cops are going to shoot you every time when you point a gun at them. They were responding to a domestic violence report, identified themselves, and the man opened the door with a gun in his hand pointed at them. They did exactly what they're supposed to do and trained to do.
Maybe I'm missing something, but it didn't look like he had raised his gun enough to me. Could the policeman have ordered him to drop the weapon before firing? I'm a big police supporter, but it just looked like he could have waited a second longer.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,159
Hard to tell for certain from the video, but it looked like it was raised enough to be aimed almost directly at the officers. If you're holding a weapon pointed down, they can afford to give you a warning. If it's pointed in your general direction, they're trained to shoot.
 

Tejas

The Rizzard of Shiz
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
844
Cops go 0-100 over little shit, you have to treat them like a dangerous dog. Don't answer the door if you aren't expecting company, don't ever answer the door for the police. And absolutely do not fling the door all the way open if you're holding a weapon. That was not a smart way to answer the door. Why open the door at all?

Looks like he opened the door holding the gun pointed at the officers and then lowered it. Probably not thinking anything of it, being nonchalant.

I also don't like how the cops hide out of the way.
 
Last edited:

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,581
Reaction score
20,031
Cops go 0-100 over little shit, you have to treat them like a dangerous dog. Don't answer the door if you aren't expecting company, don't ever answer the door for the police. And absolutely do not fling the door all the way open if you're holding a weapon. That was not a smart way to answer the door. Why open the door at all?

Looks like he opened the door holding the gun pointed at the officers and then lowered it. Probably not thinking anything of it, being nonchalant.

I also don't like how the cops hide out of the way.
I don’t have a problem with that. They announced themselves. Why should they stand in harms way? Why answer the door with a gun in your hand? He could have called 911 to verify it was the police and not an imposter at the door.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,380
I don’t have a problem with that. They announced themselves. Why should they stand in harms way? Why answer the door with a gun in your hand? He could have called 911 to verify it was the police and not an imposter at the door.

Yeah, that's where I'm at. That whole area is pretty shitty from my first hand experience, we didn't go over there. If you answer the door with a gun in your hand after the police have announced themselves, you're asking for trouble.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,379
Reaction score
5,807

One step closer to a police state
I think the demonization of police since really Ferguson has changed that. Police have been defended and held back for years. I'm all for letting them do their jobs. I have an acquaintance at the FBI who said the Merrick Garland days of catch and release criminals is over.
However, this part of Trumps order doesn't ever fly with me. I don't want cops in tanks.
 

Attachments

  • 1745895035250.png
    1745895035250.png
    173 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
I think the demonization of police since really Ferguson has changed that. Police have been defended and held back for years. I'm all for letting them do their jobs. I have an acquaintance at the FBI who said the Merrick Garland days of catch and release criminals is over.
However, this part of Trumps order doesn't every fly with me. I don't want cops in tanks.
I'm all for supporting the police, but as I've stated we need more accountability. But this isn't that at all. This is militarizing the police, this is not good in the slightest
 

calvegas04

Well-known member
Messages
11,869
Reaction score
8,442
I think the demonization of police since really Ferguson has changed that. Police have been defended and held back for years. I'm all for letting them do their jobs. I have an acquaintance at the FBI who said the Merrick Garland days of catch and release criminals is over.
However, this part of Trumps order doesn't ever fly with me. I don't want cops in tanks.
That sounds a bit scary, why does the military need to get involved with law enforcement? First getting judges arrested now this? I'm all for backing the police and stricter sentencing but not this.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,427
Reaction score
5,136
That sounds a bit scary, why does the military need to get involved with law enforcement? First getting judges arrested now this? I'm all for backing the police and stricter sentencing but not this.
I think it would be using rated military police (MPs for Army and Marines, MAs for Navy, SF for Airforce) to help out in jurisdictions that have undermanned police departments. I’m not in favor of this but it’s not like the proposal is going to be for infantry MOSes to be patrolling New York City. I just don’t think the excess manpower of resident in the DOD to support it. Every base I’ve ever been on has had local Law Enforcement assisting in gate duty in some capacity
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
I think it would be using rated military police (MPs for Army and Marines, MAs for Navy, SF for Airforce) to help out in jurisdictions that have undermanned police departments. I’m not in favor of this but it’s not like the proposal is going to be for infantry MOSes to be patrolling New York City. I just don’t think the excess manpower of resident in the DOD to support it. Every base I’ve ever been on has had local Law Enforcement assisting in gate duty in some capacity
Virginia you're smart enough to know that our military has never been used in this way before and that we have specific laws against it. This is a troubling thing
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,427
Reaction score
5,136
Virginia you're smart enough to know that our military has never been used in this way before and that we have specific laws against it. This is a troubling thing
Im Against it for sure, but it’s inaccurate to suggest that the US military has never been used in a constabulary function inside the US. There are dozens and dozens of examples of the US Military being used to enforce federal law or restore civil order inside of the US (Desegregation, Reconstruction, various examples of urban riots and other civil unrest).

While there are limitations on the extent of domestic law enforcement AD military members can conduct, there are other functions that police conduct that don’t necessarily rise to the level of law enforcement where extra bodies from a military police unit could assist to free up policing manpower to actually make arrests and such.

I think it’s a bad idea and a waste of military manpower, but not completely beyond the scope of historical precedent or crossing the rubicon. I just think that there are plenty of good reasons to be against this without going to hyperbole
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,104
Reaction score
12,943
I think it would be using rated military police (MPs for Army and Marines, MAs for Navy, SF for Airforce) to help out in jurisdictions that have undermanned police departments. I’m not in favor of this but it’s not like the proposal is going to be for infantry MOSes to be patrolling New York City. I just don’t think the excess manpower of resident in the DOD to support it. Every base I’ve ever been on has had local Law Enforcement assisting in gate duty in some capacity
Of course not because the slippery slope rubric is never applied to republican agendas.
 

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,379
Reaction score
5,807
That sounds a bit scary, why does the military need to get involved with law enforcement? First getting judges arrested now this? I'm all for backing the police and stricter sentencing but not this.
Well, when judge commits a crime, they deserve to be arrested. Reminder that nobody is above the law.

I read it as to transferring military equipment to police forces. No image better than this one-
dlzzzbBXtJ2zIc-5cmXYNom65oOh_Tf7hbykLq71PPQ.jpg
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,427
Reaction score
5,136
Of course not because the slippery slope rubric is never applied to republican agendas.
lol fair enough.

I mean I think it is completely appropriate for the military (NG) to step in in concert with law enforcement for things like the Minneapolis BLM riots and J6. I don’t think it’s appropriate for day to day stuff like this might be proposing (it’s pretty vague on what their role would be) but I don’t see it being as bad as many might think.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,581
Reaction score
20,031
That sounds a bit scary, why does the military need to get involved with law enforcement? First getting judges arrested now this? I'm all for backing the police and stricter sentencing but not this.
Why are judges above the law? They have immunity from their rulings, but they aren't immune from criminal activities they partake in.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
lol fair enough.

I mean I think it is completely appropriate for the military (NG) to step in in concert with law enforcement for things like the Minneapolis BLM riots and J6. I don’t think it’s appropriate for day to day stuff like this might be proposing (it’s pretty vague on what their role would be) but I don’t see it being as bad as many might think.
The national guard should be used in those types of situations. But this goes way further than that. We are now going to have the national government dictating policing policies at the local level.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Well, when judge commits a crime, they deserve to be arrested. Reminder that nobody is above the law.

I read it as to transferring military equipment to police forces. No image better than this one-
dlzzzbBXtJ2zIc-5cmXYNom65oOh_Tf7hbykLq71PPQ.jpg
How'd you find a picture of my dad?
 
Top