They lost because they don't understand men and they don't understand how cringe a lot of woke stuff is to normal people. It's that simple. They anointed an extremely left woman from California who did terrible in the 2020 primary and tried to repackage her as a moderate. They needed to run someone like Beshear, Kelly, etc. to have a prayer of coming across as authentic.
The issue is not Liz Cheney, the issue is the opposite. She doesn't move the needle either direction. The issue is that you have a bunch of political class lefties are steering the ship in a direction that does not appeal to large swaths of people. They live in a bubble.
What I want to see is the split of voters who went Trump + Gallego and Trump + Josh Stein. Interview those people and I bet you get to the core of the Democrats policy and messaging problem.
All true. Although, idk I'd give the trans or woke issues much weight. Certainly some, but I wouldn't list it as reason number one.
The main point I agree with is the bubble concept. Echo chambers. Top-down elitism in bed with MSM and it has resulted in a massive circle jerk. Societally, you can look no further than urban vs suburban vs rural demographics. The separation has lead to an inability to relate to one another across these lines. This has lead to a lack of empathy and, at times, downright hatred and bigotry (two way street). Polarization ensues. Whoever decides to mend these broken bridges, will steam roll opponents with overwhelming support. I think Trump's team (Tulsi, RFK, Elon, Vivek, etc) did a better job than Harris at trying to connect with the entire spectrum of voters. It's why you see support for Trump in this election go up comparatively in almost every demographic. Harris never had a chance.
The problem with the Harris campaign was that she could not effectively convey why she should be President. Her campaign revolved around why Trump shouldn't be President. Why didn't that work well? Because Trump's already been President, and for a lot of people, life was better during his Presidency compared to the past 4 years
Definitely. Very easy to look at immigration, inflation, and war as primary reasons people want to go back to Trump. It doesn't take someone with a degree from Harvard to look at their budget and realize that they're struggling worse now than before. Kamala never could differentiate herself from Biden. She didn't give voters a real reason to vote for her.
Americans want to prosper, they want to be left alone, they want to feel safe, and they want to keep their tax money in the US instead of supporting wars abroad. It's pretty simple, really, but it's in direct conflict with corporate greed, and Big ((insert sector)), MIC, etc.
Considering how poorly she did in the 2020 Democrat primary, and what it's looking like tonight, I wonder if Biden kinda screwed his own party over by pushing for Kamala to take his place unquestioned. Do you think a different candidate would have done better had they run a traditional primary, or do you think Kamala still gets the nomination? Which nominee had the best shot?
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe there was a rumor that when they finally agreed to push Biden out, they did internal polling to decide who to run in his place. Kamala is an obvious choice because she was VP, but her polling numbers weren't great. Due to that, there was hesitation but The Squad and others, went crazy over the idea of not picking Harris. Not to suggest that AOC etc had that much sway, but I think in terms of a united front to get the best candidate out there, they may have been the loudest in the room. Maybe that's all untrue, but I do remember hearing it and it makes some sense. The DNC really does need to do some soul searching because they continue to misread their base and abuse their status with shit candidates, shit platforms, and corruption.