- Messages
- 37,545
- Reaction score
- 28,995
Last edited:
I'm guessing they have something new in the bag of tricks to release on a daily basis until election day.![]()
13 former Trump administration officials sign open letter backing up John Kelly's criticism of Trump
Kelly told the New York Times that Trump meets the definition of a fascist and also said he observed the former president on multiple occasions praising Adolf Hitler.www.nbcnews.com
Bezos scared of Trump retaliation.
lol she isn't undecided! She popped in to offer a softball for her lightweight candidate.Drayer discovering that you aren’t bound to vote for your parties candidate.
Shouldn’t you be celebrating an “obvious” Harris voter being undecided?
Bezos scared of Trump retaliation.
Seems pretty unlikely given WAPO's relentless criticism of him for the past several years. Much more likely is that Bezos still hates Trump but can't, in good conscience, endorse Harris due to her complete inability to put forth a coherent honest vision/agenda, her dodging and word salad response to any and all legit questions, and her inability to think and talk in anything other than a completely scripted situation. No matter how much someone hates Trump, Haris is still woefully unqualified to be POTUS.Bezos scared of Trump retaliation.
We might actually have some large scale attempted voter fraud:
I would bet the former because there are more democrats than republicansSerious question. Disregard independents for a second. Do you think there are more registered Dem’s that are undecided or more registered Republicans?
Newspapers making endorsements is stupid to begin with.Dem Senators at risk, Casey and Baldwin, running ads touting their work with Trump
LA Times and Wa Post refusing to make endorsements
Bad signs for Kamala.
Not accurate, IMO. The Washington Post coverage circa January 6th versus Washington Post coverage over this past election cycle do not seem like they’re even the same paper.Seems pretty unlikely given WAPO's relentless criticism of him for the past several years. Much more likely is that Bezos still hates Trump but can't, in good conscience, endorse Harris due to her complete inability to put forth a coherent honest vision/agenda, her dodging and word salad response to any and all legit questions, and her inability to think and talk in anything other than a completely scripted situation. No matter how much someone hates Trump, Haris is still woefully unqualified to be POTUS.
We might actually have some large scale attempted voter fraud:
It's the dumbest shit ever.Newspapers making endorsements is stupid to begin with.
Bozos got divorced, jacked, a new girlfriend, and became based?
Zuckerberg too, minus the divorce and new girlfriend.Newspapers making endorsements is stupid to begin with.
Bozos got divorced, jacked, a new girlfriend, and became based?
Holy shit we get it dude. It’s like you have Tourette’s.Seems pretty unlikely given WAPO's relentless criticism of him for the past several years. Much more likely is that Bezos still hates Trump but can't, in good conscience, endorse Harris due to her complete inability to put forth a coherent honest vision/agenda, her dodging and word salad response to any and all legit questions, and her inability to think and talk in anything other than a completely scripted situation. No matter how much someone hates Trump, Haris is still woefully unqualified to be POTUS.
Perhaps he is trying to make a shift to being normie lib paper?Not accurate, IMO. The Washington Post coverage circa January 6th versus Washington Post coverage over this past election cycle do not seem like they’re even the same paper.
Bezos started in 2023 really making large changes to the paper. This included, but was not limited to, massively changing the leadership at the paper this past year and now personally inserting himself to tell them not to endorse anyone for president. I don’t expect you to follow WaPo coverage and I’m not a subscriber either, but they have been relatively light on their Trump coverage compared to their “Democracy dies in darkness” era 2016-2021. And Bloomberg, NYT, Columbia, etc. have all covered this shift over the past two years.
Maybe he's just decided to move back towards actual, unbiased journalism. I still think part of it is that he can't endorse Harris due to her shortcomings.Not accurate, IMO. The Washington Post coverage circa January 6th versus Washington Post coverage over this past election cycle do not seem like they’re even the same paper.
Bezos started in 2023 really making large changes to the paper. This included, but was not limited to, massively changing the leadership at the paper this past year and now personally inserting himself to tell them not to endorse anyone for president. I don’t expect you to follow WaPo coverage and I’m not a subscriber either, but they have been relatively light on their Trump coverage compared to their “Democracy dies in darkness” era 2016-2021. And Bloomberg, NYT, Columbia, etc. have all covered this shift over the past two years.
Zuck saved his marriage by taking HGH, spending his free time grilling meats, and training in BJJ. He doesn't have time to get a divorce.Zuckerberg too, minus the divorce and new girlfriend.
There has been a massive tonal shift with the tech billionaires over the past few years and it has a lot to do with the fact that trying to run big businesses + comply with DEI and woke crap = not being onboard with the leftward lurch of this country.
Dude is one of the top three richest people on the planet, the quality of that snizz he blew his marriage up over is absolutely shameful.
So, has she then put forth any sort of coherent vision or agenda or clear ideas of where she stands on most issues? Does she not dodge all serious direct questions and instead reply with a barrage of nonsense and word salad, sounding like a kid giving a book report on a book they haven't read? Have you seen & heard her try to speak impromptu, or discuss any serious matters outside a scripted or staged softball interview (and even then comes across as a mindless nitwit most of the time)? Even CNN has trashed her this week for exactly what I'm saying. You do know we've all seen her and heard her talk, right?Holy shit we get it dude. It’s like you have Tourette’s.
I just imagine you surrounded by your poor family at thanksgiving watching you carve the turkey while you mutter about word salad and DEI over and over again.So, has she then put forth any sort of coherent vision or agenda or clear ideas of where she stands on most issues? Does she not dodge all serious direct questions and instead reply with a barrage of nonsense and word salad, sounding like a kid giving a book report on a book they haven't read? Have you seen & heard her try to speak impromptu, or discuss any serious matters outside a scripted or staged softball interview (and even then comes across as a mindless nitwit most of the time)? Even CNN has trashed her this week for exactly what I'm saying. You do know we've all seen her and heard her talk, right?
Wa Post writer. LOL.
"and lives on the line"
Wa Post writer. LOL.
"and lives on the line"