Always found that interesting that there was nary a whisper about taking down those statues. Seems a little hypocritical.Sooo, can we take down crusty ass Confederate statues while keeping Lincoln & Washington or nah??
Are ya 'both sides-ing' the union vs. confederacy?Always found that interesting that there was nary a whisper about taking down those statues. Seems a little hypocritical.
Maybe Lincoln and Washington were secretly confederates is his point?Are ya 'both sides-ing' the union vs. confederacy?
I must need new glasses as I thought I read Jefferson and Washington.Are ya 'both sides-ing' the union vs. confederacy?
This just popped up at the top of my feed. Feel like I'm taking crazy pills.

I knew she cheated. ABC gave questions on his liabilities and fed her the questions. Donna Brazille only worse.
I knew she cheated. ABC gave questions on his liabilities and fed her the questions. Donna Brazille only worse.
It's the only explanation. How else could she have known they would ask her questions about the economy? Russia/Ukraine? Healthcare? Illegal immigration?It's not like this is a surprise. At all. I think most of us expected it. Most of the media in this country has all the honesty and integrity of a crack ho.
Don't ask them to look up the source of the rumor LOL it'll be pretty sad state of affairs for them to realize it.It's the only explanation. How else could she have known they would ask her questions about the economy? Russia/Ukraine? Healthcare? Illegal immigration?
She was apparently given specific questions to be asked. You do remember that Donna Brazile gave Hilary's campaign the questions to be asked at a debate, right? Not like this is anything new.It's the only explanation. How else could she have known they would ask her questions about the economy? Russia/Ukraine? Healthcare? Illegal immigration?
It is all theater. She rejected a debate on Fox as well
When has that ever stopped Bishop?There is no actual evidence of those claims at all lmao hold your horses
Call me crazy but the country shouldn't be honoring Lee or any other Confederate that fought against the Union. We should have never erected statues or named military bases after a bunch of rebel losers. Only in America tho with our participation trophies do losers get that kind of recognition.
And you called me "fucking disingenuous"
This is what I said "Cool your jets little bro, the very fine people who are pro-Robert E Lee who somehow don't fall into the Nazi/White nationalist bucket are fine people? Those people?"
So, you're agreeing with my point but then just making shit up because you don't like my opinions lol. You offered promise, I thought you wouldn't be like your older counterparts.
There are a lot of people who are Robert E. Lee fans. He is studied around the world for his defensive military genius. He was even revered in the north.
You realize that before the US Civil War, there was more pride in your state than the country, right? Virginia was by far the most prestgious state in the union ever since George Washington. It was then referred to as 'these United States' and was merely held together by a non binding union.
Im sure their are fine people who want to preserve history and not tear down statues. Just like I'm sure their are fine people who feel that it's time for them to be removed. I'm also sure that their are not so fine people on those two sides of the aisle.
I'm not a big Robert E. Lee fan myself. When Stonewall Jackson was killed by friendly fire, it removed his right arm.
I'm a big U.S. Grant fan and almost named my son Grant, like I named my daughter Reagan. Sherman is my second favorite General.
You do not have statues for traitors. Simple as that. Putting them up in the 1960's because the civil rights movement, that's another huge L.
You have a point.
You can study his military tactics all you want. But you don't put up statues of people that actively fought to leave this country
He's had to prepare for two different candidates this election cycle, while they prepared for the same guy. Both Democrat candidates set the ground rules for each debate. ABC certainly wasn't friendly given the fact they decided to fact check him, but refused to fact check Kamala. Next debate probably should be on Fox News to be fair. After the debate a Reuters poll found undecided voters were leaning toward Trump 2 to 1. Coward indeed.Could have fooled me. Didn't seem like he prepared at all.He's had to prepare for two different candidates this election cycle, while they prepared for the same guy. Both Democrat candidates set the ground rules for each debate. ABC certainly wasn't friendly given the fact they decided to fact check him, but refused to fact check Kamala. Next debate probably should be on Fox News to be fair. After the debate a Reuters poll found undecided voters were leaning toward Trump 2 to 1. Coward indeed.
He's had to prepare for two different candidates this election cycle, while they prepared for the same guy. Both Democrat candidates set the ground rules for each debate. ABC certainly wasn't friendly given the fact they decided to fact check him, but refused to fact check Kamala. Next debate probably should be on Fox News to be fair. After the debate a Reuters poll found undecided voters were leaning toward Trump 2 to 1. Coward indeed.
I want to understand how anyone is undecided. People may not like one or both, but the difference is a mile-wide. You've had the 4-year sampler of each.![]()
Pundits Said Harris Won the Debate. Undecided Voters Weren’t So Sure.
Voters said the vice president talked about a sweeping vision to fix the country’s most stubborn problems. But they wanted the fine print.www.nytimes.com