Politics

[Bishop2b5]

I usually find Bill Maher to be insufferably smarmy, but over the past year or two he's come to see the woke radical left as dangerous and bad for civilization. He's taken a particular dislike to hypocrites and the professional SJW's who protest & riot to stroke their ego and boost their social media presence. This short clip of him talking about them is 100% spot on and exactly what we on the Right have been saying for years. Welcome to our world, Bill.

 

[ulukinatme]

I usually find Bill Maher to be insufferably smarmy, but over the past year or two he's come to see the woke radical left as dangerous and bad for civilization. He's taken a particular dislike to hypocrites and the professional SJW's who protest & riot to stroke their ego and boost their social media presence. This short clip of him talking about them is 100% spot on and exactly what we on the Right have been saying for years. Welcome to our world, Bill.

Damn it, that's like...4 times I've agreed with Maher in the last year now. What is happening?!

 

[GATTACA!]

Yup. There's just not enough money or power backing a 3rd party at this point in time, and there probably never will be. I think we'd need to see an independent party gain a lot of seats in Congress before a legitimate presidential candidate could win and they would have to be very influential with cash behind them. Trump is probably the closest any outsider will get considering he switched parties and had absolutely no previous political experience.

Ranked choice voting is the solution.

 

[BleedBlueGold]

Given the dislike for Biden and Trump, he will probably get a lot of votes. Unfortunately I don't see it being enough.

Yup. There's just not enough money or power backing a 3rd party at this point in time, and there probably never will be. I think we'd need to see an independent party gain a lot of seats in Congress before a legitimate presidential candidate could win and they would have to be very influential with cash behind them. Trump is probably the closest any outsider will get considering he switched parties and had absolutely no previous political experience.

As crazy as it is to say it, it will take a complete and utter breakdown of the US as we know it before this machine that we call government changes from it's oligarchic ways. Rs and Ds are the same side of an evil coin, propped up and held in power by these massive corporations like Blackrock and Vanguard. The entire goal is money, power, and self preservation --> ie. to squash anything or anyone that threatens the status quo.

I don't see any way that a 3rd party candidate can win. I think Trump is going to win in a landslide and the Ds will point the finger at Kennedy as their scapegoat (just like they did with Russia....it's never them at fault....always someone or something else). They'll use the loss to further divide the country and clamp down on free and fair elections even more so than they already do. If Biden wins again, we'll just repeat the same post election chaos and election denial as before. It's lose lose, imo.

 

[drayer54]

Always used to think Kennedy was an anti-vaxer and a conspiracy theorist, but the more I listen to him talk, he seems like a completely normal person to me. Will be very interesting to track his campaign, as he is polling as the highest third party candidate since Perot.

Curious how much of his support is generic protest vote over having Trump and Biden.

 

[NorthDakota]

Curious how much of his support is generic protest vote over having Trump and Biden.

I bet a very large chunk of it

 

[GATTACA!]

clamp down on free and fair elections even more so than they already do.

Wrong side on that one.

 

[drayer54]

Wrong side on that one.

Recall HR-1, the rig the elections act?

 

[BleedBlueGold]

Wrong side on that one.

I don't follow.

 

[GATTACA!]

I don't follow.

Dems aren't the ones that want to make it as hard as possible to vote and can't win a popular vote to save their lives.

 

[drayer54]

Dems aren't the ones that want to make it as hard as possible to vote and can't win a popular vote to save their lives.

Dems are the only ones who pushed an election-rigging bill, HR-1. Requiring citizenship and ID is reasonable.

They are also making free speech harder on purpose.

 

[Sea Turtle]

Wrong side on that one.

I test drove an Accord this week. I had to present a DL and an insurance card, which thy made copies of, to do so.

I don't think an ID to vote is unreasonable.

 

[Blazers46]

I test drove an Accord this week. I had to present a DL and an insurance card, which thy made copies of, to do so.

I don't think an ID to vote is unreasonable.

The dems condemn Orange man for saying the election was rigged… but in the next breath don’t care about voting integrity by validating the voter. Elections aren’t important enough to care who votes but they care even some one denies election results. They care about Jan 6th and call it an insurrection, people trying to overturn an election they don’t even care how or who is voting.

 

[Blazers46]

Dems aren't the ones that want to make it as hard as possible to vote and can't win a popular vote to save their lives.

You wouldn’t believe how strenuous it was for me to reach in my back pocket, pull out my ID and show it to the person working at the voting place. I’m glad I’m white because if I were a minority I’m not sure I could have handled that sort of difficulty.

 

[GATTACA!]

The dems condemn Orange man for saying the election was rigged… but in the next breath don’t care about voting integrity by validating the voter. Elections aren’t important enough to care who votes but they care even some one denies election results. They care about Jan 6th and call it an insurrection, people trying to overturn an election they don’t even care how or who is voting.

It’s funny how the only people that have been found to have voted illegally in 2020 have been Trump supporters. You’d think for all the complaining of illegals or dead people republicans claim are voting they can’t prove a single one.

 

[BleedBlueGold]

Dems aren't the ones that want to make it as hard as possible to vote and can't win a popular vote to save their lives.

The reason why RFK Jr is running third party is because of what the Dem Party did to make it almost impossible for him to get on some state ballots, get on a debate stage, get delegates, etc. They partake in gerrymandering, just like Rs have done. They're for open borders, yet conveniently against vote ID. As mentioned, the HR1 bill. Etc. I'm not going to act like Rs aren't guilty of trying to preserve their own positions, but if anyone thinks Dems are innocent within the topic of rigged elections, they're blind.

 

[Blazers46]

It’s funny how the only people that have been found to have voted illegally in 2020 have been Trump supporters. You’d think for all the complaining of illegals or dead people republicans claim are voting they can’t prove a single one.

If these dead people voted with an ID we would know.

Lets not use ID for alcohol or tobacco purchases. What do you think WOULD happen? Then let’s go back and try to prove these people that never had to validate who they are bought tobacco or alcohol. Good luck chuck.

 

[drayer54]

It’s funny how the only people that have been found to have voted illegally in 2020 have been Trump supporters. You’d think for all the complaining of illegals or dead people republicans claim are voting they can’t prove a single one.

Still waiting for any of this crap to be true. At some point, we need to move on from the election rigging crap unless evidence appears. I don't recall ever claiming 2020 was rigged by dead people or illegals. I do think one could argue some states manipulated COVID to sacrifice election integrity, but that's a whole different claim.

 

[Blazers46]

Still waiting for any of this crap to be true. At some point, we need to move on from the election rigging crap unless evidence appears. I don't recall ever claiming 2020 was rigged by dead people or illegals. I do think one could argue some states manipulated COVID to sacrifice election integrity, but that's a whole different claim.

But voting isn’t important enough to use ID.

 

[drayer54]

But voting isn’t important enough to use ID.

A bunch of people are going to be pissed off this November. The flakier our elections are, the more justified it is. We need to make sure elections are secure. Always baffles me that we know Florida results by 8 PM and California and Michigan need a week.

 

[Irish#1]

I've yet to hear a decent argument for not requiring ID to vote.

 

[drayer54]

 

[RDU Irish]

I've yet to hear a decent argument for not requiring ID to vote.

Because it doesn't exist. To the contrary, opposition to voter ID is pretty good proof that the fraud is on, particularly when you look at how vehemently it is opposed.

 

[ab2cmiller]

1:42 of stumbling and bumbling with the only intelligible comments that I can take away is that the government does print money and they do borrow money. LOL

 

[TorontoGold]

Economics is a social science lmao. I have a degree in economics and everything he studied in his DSW is extremely relevant to his position.

Of course, when your position is to be anti-intellectual you'll never understand that lol.

 

[GowerND11]

I've yet to hear a decent argument for not requiring ID to vote.

I'd be fine with requiring them. In fact, when I switched polling places I had to show it.

That said, I do think IDs should be free of charge if they are to be required. Right or wrong, people will sue and win saying it's a form of poll tax if they have to be paid for.

 

[Blazers46]

I'd be fine with requiring them. In fact, when I switched polling places I had to show it.

That said, I do think IDs should be free of charge if they are to be required. Right or wrong, people will sue and win saying it's a form of poll tax if they have to be paid for.

Pretty sure state IDs are free… for the very purpose of voting.

 

[GowerND11]

Pretty sure state IDs are free… for the very purpose of voting.

Might depend on the state. Here in PA it’s $40 or so.

Granted is that a lot? No, but if you want voter IDs, they need to be free universally

 

[drayer54]

Might depend on the state. Here in PA it’s $40 or so.

Granted is that a lot? No, but if you want voter IDs, they need to be free universally

OK

 

[Blazers46]

Might depend on the state. Here in PA it’s $40 or so.

Granted is that a lot? No, but if you want voter IDs, they need to be free universally

PA doesn’t require ID to vote.

First Time Voters

First Time Voters

www.vote.pa.gov