All Things SCOTUS

[drayer54]

How much does it cost to properly interpret the constitution?

Clarence Thomas’ Private Complaints About Money Sparked Fears He Would Resign

Interviews and newly unearthed documents reveal that Thomas, facing financial strain, privately pushed for a higher salary and to allow Supreme Court justices to take speaking fees.

www.propublica.org

Thanks for sharing attack work from Democrat dark money designed to smear the court and Thomas. Pro Publica is not a news source, nor is it even real. Left-wing extremists want to to destroy anything they can't control, including the court.

This isn't a serious complaint, Pro Publica is a smear org, and you are again sharing garbage.

 

[Cackalacky2.0]

 

[Redbar]

This explains the ROI for Justice Tom, how much did he need not to leave.

 

[Bluto]

Always strange seeing people defend a person who is a demonstrably corrupt POS.

 

[drayer54]

While Dems continue an assault on our courts, they nominate this level of stupid and nobody can question it..

 

[Blazers46]

While Dems continue an assault on our courts, they nominate this level of stupid and nobody can question it..

It’s like she has no clue the role government or what country she lives in. Insane ignorance.

 

[NorthDakota]

It’s like she has no clue the role government or what country she lives in. Insane ignorance.

She might. She could've been fishing too. I didn't listen today

 

[Irish#1]

While Dems continue an assault on our courts, they nominate this level of stupid and nobody can question it..

I don't expect our SC members to know everything, but how could she not know this? smh

 

[drayer54]

I don't expect our SC members to know everything, but how could she not know this? smh

She was prob educated and socialized in a setting where tearing down precedent to advance their unconstitutional crap was the norm.

 

[drayer54]

Oh.

 

[Henges24]

Well she has a point. But the lawyer said it correctly. It’s a slippery slope.

Either way, the outcome of this will not be pretty.

Then you have Obamagate if the SC decides the go that route. It’ll be a tear down.

 

[GATTACA!]

Oh.

"Embarrassed" lol

 

[Bluto]

"Embarrassed" lol

Originalism, justices aren’t supposed to legislate from the bench…blah…blah…blah.

The conservative justices on the bench in this Supreme Court are a fucking embarrassment in so much as their ability to completely forget/ignore their supposed underlying judicial philosophy when it’s convenient.

 

[drayer54]

Originalism, justices aren’t supposed to legislate from the bench…blah…blah…blah.

The conservative justices on the bench in this Supreme Court are a fucking embarrassment in so much as their ability to completely forget/ignore their supposed underlying judicial philosophy when it’s convenient.

They are the last barrier now to an executive branch that is already defying the courts and abusing its power.

 

[NorthDakota]

Originalism, justices aren’t supposed to legislate from the bench…blah…blah…blah.

The conservative justices on the bench in this Supreme Court are a fucking embarrassment in so much as their ability to completely forget/ignore their supposed underlying judicial philosophy when it’s convenient.

Care to explain?

 

[drayer54]

Our principled norms are intact

 

[Irish#1]

Joe is a national treasure.

 

[GATTACA!]

https://www.salon.com/2024/06/20/intentional-harvard-legal-scholar-says-scotus-deliberately-delayed-immunity-ruling/

 

[Irish#1]

Claire Wofford, political science professor at the College of Charleston, said it’s “certainly fair” to criticize the court for not taking up the case sooner.

But she added: “If you wanted, there are lots of people you could hold responsible for how long this is taking."

 

[drayer54]

The Democrats are making a political stand to de-legitimize the court because they don't have direct control over it. It's purely political and a demonstration of the party over a country by willfully undermining a branch of government.

 

[GoIrish41]

The Democrats are making a political stand to de-legitimize the court because they don't have direct control over it. It's purely political and a demonstration of the party over a country by willfully undermining a branch of government.

Bullshit. You have Clarence Thomas and Neal Gorsuch living like billionaires on bribes from donors with business before the court and Sam Alito accosting his neighbors for supporting democrats in election season. These fuckers aren’t even trying to appear neutral about anything as they strip women of their rights and run interference for a convicted felon. This is the shittiest of shit takes!

 

[drayer54]

Bullshit. You have Clarence Thomas and Neal Gorsuch living like billionaires on bribes from donors with business before the court and Sam Alito accosting his neighbors for supporting democrats in election season. These fuckers aren’t even trying to appear neutral about anything as they strip women of their rights and run interference for a convicted felon. This is the shittiest of shit takes!

I would argue that THIS nonsense is the shittiest of takes. It's a coordinated hit piece from Dems in the Senate and their allies on TV. They want to de-legitimize the court to move the needle on support for packing the court. They pushed an ethics bill that is an insane attempt to regulate them with a D(emocrat)C Circuit and put their preferred activists on the bench. This story only resonates with people who hate Republicans and Clarence Thomas.

 

[GATTACA!]

I would argue that THIS nonsense is the shittiest of takes. It's a coordinated hit piece from Dems in the Senate and their allies on TV. They want to de-legitimize the court to move the needle on support for packing the court. They pushed an ethics bill that is an insane attempt to regulate them with a D(emocrat)C Circuit and put their preferred activists on the bench. This story only resonates with people who hate Republicans and Clarence Thomas.

So no response to any of the claims. Just keep calling it a hit piece.

Very persuasive.

 

[ab2cmiller]

So no response to any of the claims. Just keep calling it a hit piece.

Very persuasive.

Would it be better if we called it Russian disinformation?

 

[GATTACA!]

Would it be better if we called it Russian disinformation?

 

[Cackalacky2.0]

The political science department at CofC isn’t some bastion of great political thought 🤣. That’s my school it’s like three people. Lol

 

[GoIrish41]

I would argue that THIS nonsense is the shittiest of takes. It's a coordinated hit piece from Dems in the Senate and their allies on TV. They want to de-legitimize the court to move the needle on support for packing the court. They pushed an ethics bill that is an insane attempt to regulate them with a D(emocrat)C Circuit and put their preferred activists on the bench. This story only resonates with people who hate Republicans and Clarence Thomas.

Next time save yourself some keystrokes and just acknowledge you are a dipshit.

 

[drayer54]

Next time save yourself some keystrokes and just acknowledge you are a dipshit.

You're the dumbass falling for the scheme. They went the power and will defund or delegitimize anything not firmly under left wing control. From the police to the court. Its a power grab and the whole left has jumped on it since Roe was overturned.

 

[drayer54]

So no response to any of the claims. Just keep calling it a hit piece.

Very persuasive

Imagine someone in a red hat screaming Benghazi or Venezuelan voting machines at you and then scrutinizing you for not entertaining their conspiracy theory.

 

[GoIrish41]

You're the dumbass falling for the scheme. They went the power and will defund or delegitimize anything not firmly under left wing control. From the police to the court. Its a power grab and the whole left has jumped on it since Roe was overturned.

😂