- Messages
- 16,041
- Reaction score
- 5,491
I see 90s Bill CowherStrong VanGorder vibes from that pic or nah?
I can’t unsee the coach of the Dolphins from Ballers in that
I scrolled down here to post both of these lol. First two things I thought.Strong VanGorder vibes from that pic or nah?
FixedHaving seen the Saban Alabama and Smart Georgia teams of the last several years, I have come to the conclusion that this hire is probably going to prove the most pivotal for Marcus Freeman. After all the five star recruits, transfers, bloated assistant coaching salaries and schemes it really comes down to the size and ferocity of your players. So much of the discussion is predicated on Saban, recruiting, facilities, academics, etc. but in the end the Bama and UGA guys should scare the hell out of anyone when they get off the bus. Then they put pads on and level most of whatever gets in their way.
The Stanford clubs of Harbaugh and early Shaw had a trainer give them roids. I think Marcus Freeman might be hedging his tenure on having a team that can play some bully ball in the new 12 team playoff era, but the standard until further notice is Bama and UGA. You're going to have to have big strong dudes who can move now more than ever before.
I think this has separated Bama and UGA for the last several years. We've had the Clemson, LSU, Ohio State blips yes. However on a consistent basis year in and year out these two programs have produced size and strength as just about every position on the field. I like the ND linebackers. They're smart, tough football kids. When you look at them and then look at the guys at the same position for Bama and UGA, there is a noticeable difference to the eye alone.They talked a bit about Ole Miss/Kiffin playing Georgia this year. Said he knew during warm ups they were in trouble just based on the size of the Dawgs and knew he had to get bigger and stronger in the offseason.
Same accusations are leveled at this program during the Faust and Holtz years. Not sure what to tell you other than I suppose no one is beyond suspicion at any point if MLB 1990s has taught us anything.Fixed
I think this has separated Bama and UGA for the last several years. We've had the Clemson, LSU, Ohio State blips yes. However on a consistent basis year in and year out these two programs have produced size and strength as just about every position on the field. I like the ND linebackers. They're smart, tough football kids. When you look at them and then look at the guys at the same position for Bama and UGA, there is a noticeable difference to the eye alone.
Then it goes to the NFL Combine and manifests itself in the sports science numbers.
It isn't so much about yesterday as it is about the last several years watching them and the body of work. The guys they're sending into the NFL are being picked high and are contributing as starters. Marcus Freeman is tasked with getting Notre Dame to that point consistently. I think we've seen our share under Kelly, but not at a rate that has allowed the program to be a champion.I was at the Orange Bowl yesterday. The size difference between UGA and FSU was almost laughable. Yes, I know FSU had a lot of guys out - but they didn't have a chance.
I think this has separated Bama and UGA for the last several years. We've had the Clemson, LSU, Ohio State blips yes. However on a consistent basis year in and year out these two programs have produced size and strength as just about every position on the field. I like the ND linebackers. They're smart, tough football kids. When you look at them and then look at the guys at the same position for Bama and UGA, there is a noticeable difference to the eye alone.
Then it goes to the NFL Combine and manifests itself in the sports science numbers.
Yes, yes and yes. Also I dont necessarily think they are doing anything unscrupulous to have these guys make incredible gains. If you look at the size of the kids they are recruiting vs everybody else, these dudes are already enormous before they step foot on campus. They are just molding them into machines, helping them further develop and channel their Natural abilities.It isn't so much about yesterday as it is about the last several years watching them and the body of work. The guys they're sending into the NFL are being picked high and are contributing as starters. Marcus Freeman is tasked with getting Notre Dame to that point consistently. I think we've seen our share under Kelly, but not at a rate that has allowed the program to be a champion.
In addition to their size, there is a sense of urgency and ferocity these players have. They pursue and engage with extreme purpose.
Yep. They have their pick of recruits (unlike, say, Stanford). They have great coaching and culture. And after three or four years those guys are just dudes.Yes, yes and yes. Also I dont necessarily think they are doing anything unscrupulous to have these guys make incredible gains. If you look at the size of the kids they are recruiting vs everybody else, these dudes are already enormous before they step foot on campus. They are just molding them into machines, helping them further develop and channel their Natural abilities.
The only real peptides that are going to add much would be the gh peptide... and even to make that much of a difference would be extremely expensive since it requires several months to notice... some sarms also will add some muscle mass but nothing will add muscle more than a test base... from there anything can be stacked with it in terms of other anabolics such as tren, primo, masteron anavar etc... but I would highly highly doubt any strength trainer is encouraging this directly due to the sheer issues that could come from this...I'm not niave, and use myself.... big big thing is genetics and nutrition... and they are likely genetic freaks and are getting top of the line nutritionThe new hotness is peptides. Would not be shocked if the top programs were using them in some form.