I'm 50/50 on it. On the one hand, I love that Freeman is making sure the class is complete, well-rounded, and we're not left with "empty" position groups (WRs a few years back, safety last class). I'm a big proponent of filling the class at every position to make sure we're never thin.
That being said...Freeman was sold to us as the guy who would put us at a different level than Kelly on the recruiting trail. This class isn't done, and obviously the last few classes have been very, very good - but we need to close the gap with the OSUs and Clemsons of the world first before even thinking about getting to a Bama/Georgia level (which, let's be real, probably is never going to happen). And this class doesn't look like it's going to be that next step up.
Again, I'm willing to be patient, and I do think there's something to be said about making sure every position is filled. But we need to start getting more top 50 recruits. It's as simple as that.