dublinirish
Everestt Gholstonson
- Messages
- 27,334
- Reaction score
- 13,094
his gf is going to WVU, ND just got Elijah Hood'ed
idk but some of you ELITE'S need to get off your high horses...whatever a kid and family choose is their choice to make...500k is life changing...never know what the circumstances are and even if they aren't in line w/ what you would steer your kid to, doesn't make THEIR decision wrong
Hell 500K would change my life. Couple that with a free education and the kid, if he plays his cards right, will graduate college debt free and maybe without a house and/or car payment.
If we're going to be bitter to anyone, it should be to the system and/or ND for not adapting to the change in times. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
This 100% correct. Imo they should se a limit such as the plays can't make more than 150,000 dollars during their time in college. That is still going to be life changing as well.Hell 500K would change my life. Couple that with a free education and the kid, if he plays his cards right, will graduate college debt free and maybe without a house and/or car payment.
If we're going to be bitter to anyone, it should be to the system and/or ND for not adapting to the change in times. Don't hate the player, hate the game.
Imo they should se a limit such as the plays can't make more than 150,000 dollars during their time in college.
Definitely market correct when it’s both not worth it and when kids don’t get what was promised. This is one I’m surprised by the overall reaction (not anything about your post and if even true), which surely is because we’re on the losing end. The “hometown hero” getting a deal to stay home for the little guy and spurn the big bad Penn St, Notre Dame etc is likely a story outsiders will look at as one of the NIL success stories.It'll take a few years but at some level the market will take care of this. Paying a high school kid $500,000 to come play for your favorite college football team is - most of the time - not going to be a good investment.
I know three people who saw him play in person multiple times and based on that sample size of performances didn't think he was a superstar. Not that they know more than college coaches, obviously, but if you're going to see a four star recruit play live you would expect if not at least hope for some big play type of excitement. This didn't happen on multiple viewings from three different guys I know who played college ball and coach.Don’t do that. It was dirty pool when stuff like that was posted on Clemson’s 247 board in reference Absher. Unless you’re willing to grab your stones and share what you’ve got, just don't.
I know three people who saw him play in person multiple times and based on that sample size of performances didn't think he was a superstar. Not that they know more than college coaches, obviously, but if you're going to see a four star recruit play live you would expect if not at least hope for some big play type of excitement. This didn't happen on multiple viewings from three different guys I know who played college ball and coach.
Being from that area, they also seemed to be keyed in on the idea that WVU was more of a front runner than ND was despite what Loy and Singer were saying back in late winter/early spring. There was genuine interest, but RG came to conclude that ND wasn't really going to be for him. Which is fine, right? Why force the issue?
That's really all I have here. I hope that's satisfactory.
You know, I have to remind myself that often times you have to walk on egg shells in a lot of these threads.If you or locals just doubted his skill, it’d have just said that from the jump haha. The cloak and dagger seemed to imply other things. I somewhat agree, and posted as such, in that I don’t agree with his ranking, but the loss here is the skill set. We aren’t littered with shifty slot playmakers which even if a tad inflated on his ranking, Gallagher is.
You know, I have to remind myself that often times you have to walk on egg shells in a lot of these threads.
I'll be certain to be more succinct moving forward.
Communist.This 100% correct. Imo they should se a limit such as the plays can't make more than 150,000 dollars during their time in college. That is still going to be life changing as well.
I would be for setting some rule you cannot make money off your likeness until at least game 1 of your freshman season.This 100% correct. Imo they should se a limit such as the plays can't make more than 150,000 dollars during their time in college. That is still going to be life changing as well.
They'd just sign agreements where payment is deferred until then. It's simple, the NCAA can set any rules they want but the same old schools will break those rules and the NCAA won't enforce them.I would be for setting some rule you cannot make money off your likeness until at least game 1 of your freshman season.
Even deferred. Wouldn’t any payment to the kid for their likeness destroy their HS eligibility? Or do HS not have these restrictions?They'd just sign agreements where payment is deferred until then. It's simple, the NCAA can set any rules they want but the same old schools will break those rules and the NCAA won't enforce them.
Not sure. I’ve not heard that come up. I would think most would be paid after their senior season ended (November) anyway.Even deferred. Wouldn’t any payment to the kid for their likeness destroy their HS eligibility? Or do HS not have these restrictions?
Seems like it depends a lot on the state. Rules are all over the map, and quickly-changing.Even deferred. Wouldn’t any payment to the kid for their likeness destroy their HS eligibility? Or do HS not have these restrictions?
1 million dollarsYoung man could do he and his family a big favor by avoiding that bowl of mediocrity.
I will believe it when I see the tax returns. Otherwise it’s all words (rumors and innuendo)1 million dollars
U will never see his tax return so ?I will believe it when I see the tax returns. Otherwise it’s all words (rumors and innuendo)
Thanks 🙏🏻U will never see his tax return so ?