Bishop2b5
SEC Exchange Student
- Messages
- 8,932
- Reaction score
- 6,160
It's not that so much as it's that so many only want the "facts" that tell them what they already believe.Nobody waits for the facts anymore.
It's not that so much as it's that so many only want the "facts" that tell them what they already believe.Nobody waits for the facts anymore.
I watched the Matt Walsh documentary "What Is A Woman?" tonight and it's absolutely phenomenal. Regardless of how you feel about transgender issues, this is very well done, fair, and informative. Walsh is conservative and very much opposed to allowing minors to take hormones or have gender reassignment surgery, but he didn't attack or argue with anyone in the documentary, didn't try to ask any "gotcha!" questions, and was respectful to everyone.
He interviews a number of people from all across the political spectrum and experts from both sides of the issue. It was definitely telling to see the reactions and attempts to avoid the question when he'd simply ask, "What is a woman?" It also delves deeply into where did this all come from and why. HIGHLY recommend watching this! This is one of the best documentaries I've seen in years.
Here are a few short clips:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt20256528/#_=_
Truly a generational mind who has totally normal thoughts. Dinesh D'Souza has a great documentary out there, it's very well done, fair reporting.
View attachment 3050802
View attachment 3050803
? Are you saying his video was his worst moment? Because I laugh emoji'd that.Let’s find your worst moment and laugh emoji you…
I’m saying your passive aggressive response veiled as a laugh emoji is your response… and when called out on your trollish behavior you try to find his worst moment that has really nothing to do with the conversation. If you can’t discredit the message try to discredit the messenger. Hence how it epitomizes the documentary… the question still remains what is Women. So far your response seems to be “laugh emoji”.? Are you saying his video was his worst moment? Because I laugh emoji'd that.
"trollish" says the guy who initiated a response from me first...but yes I am the troll L O LI’m saying your passive aggressive response veiled as a laugh emoji is your response… and when called out on your trollish behavior you try to find his worst moment that has really nothing to do with the conversation. If you can’t discredit the message try to discredit the messenger. Hence how it epitomizes the documentary… the question still remains what is Women. So far your response seems to be “laugh emoji”.
I think it would be more fun to ask Toronto to answer the question What is a Woman?Toronto, have you watched What Is A Woman?
YESSS!!! NOW THATS A RESPONSE!! In your quest to insult me and be the smartest person in the room, you insulted the original poster and those that supported (liked) the post. And yet still no substantive argument on what a women is…"trollish" says the guy who initiated a response from me first...but yes I am the troll L O L
If you want to believe that Matt Walsh is making sound arguments then all I have is a laugh emoji for that, because he is a room temp IQ (celsius) kind of guy. Walsh makes tweets/videos that are based purely in stoking emotions of those that want to be offended. He's the campus protestor that grew up to make content for those that want to stay offended.
Watched some scenes, and it certainly hits on all the points that some want. Certainly emotional and made to stoke tensions.Toronto, have you watched What Is A Woman?
I insulted Matt Walsh, and said he makes content for those that want that kind of stuff. Lol because who cares what a women is to me, essentially if someone wants to be one go nuts. Just because I am attracted to women does not mean that I am attracted to each one. Does not hurt me if someone wants to be one, and I am secure enough in knowing what I like.YESSS!!! NOW THATS A RESPONSE!! In your quest to insult me and be the smartest person in the room, you insulted the original poster and those that supported (liked) the post. And yet still no substantive argument on what a women is…
I would love to stick around but I have a hot date with this feminine human I married that happens to have a vagina… we will call her “woman”.
Don't judge it based on watching a few clips. That won't give you a very accurate view of the documentary. Watch the entire thing if you can. It's well done and covers some good points. The inability of even the biggest so-called experts in the field to answer basic questions or deliver a rational explanation of their position is very telling.Watched some scenes, and it certainly hits on all the points that some want. Certainly emotional and made to stoke tensions.
What if it was… you hatin? Seems a bit hypocritical.Watched some scenes, and it certainly hits on all the points that some want. Certainly emotional and made to stoke tensions.
I insulted Matt Walsh, and said he makes content for those that want that kind of stuff. Lol because who cares what a women is to me, essentially if someone wants to be one go nuts. Just because I am attracted to women does not mean that I am attracted to each one. Does not hurt me if someone wants to be one, and I am secure enough in knowing what I like.
Have fun, with that kind of wording I'm not convinced it isn't just a sex doll with self cut holes.
In this theory that likely encompass both of us? If the person presenting as a woman says that they're a dude that would change the equation for me. I feel like that would the same for you too?What if it was… you hatin? Seems a bit hypocritical.
What do you mean by “just because I’m attracted to women”. Assuming you don’t ask everyone you are attracted to what their gender is you could be attracted to man, right?
In this theory that likely encompass both of us? If the person presenting as a woman says that they're a dude that would change the equation for me. I feel like that would the same for you too?
Some people like them in a salad….It’s not the size of the pickle that matters, it’s how you use it.
You see, I'm not being hypocritical if I say that I am attracted to women with vaginas/breasts. Just because I am straight does not mean I am attracted to all women. It's really not that hard to understand. You can be a woman, I am not required to find all women attractive - do you understand that? Maybe you have lower standards but I don't think its wrong to have preferences.To what theory? Who’s reality or theory are we talking about? My reality where men have a penis and women have a vagina or the lefts theories/reality where the person with a vagina can identify as a man and person with a penis can identify and be a woman or whatever it wants to be? We have different definitions of what a women/man is or can be. By your definition of a women you are essentially being homophobic assuming every women with breasts and vagina (or in your circles - birthing people) are women. If you subscribe to the idea they can be a man or whatever they want, you might as well have a coming out party. I’d rather you be real with yourself then be so hypocritical. You say you are attracted to women but in the same post essentially say a man with a penis can identify as a woman. You sort of put yourself in a pickle…
Just doesn’t sound like you are being inclusive and affirming their gender choice. You are discriminating…You see, I'm not being hypocritical if I say that I am attracted to women with vaginas/breasts. Just because I am straight does not mean I am attracted to all women. It's really not that hard to understand. You can be a woman, I am not required to find all women attractive - do you understand that? Maybe you have lower standards but I don't think its wrong to have preferences.
How? LolJust doesn’t sound like you are being inclusive and affirming their gender choice. You are discriminating…
How? Lol
Do you think every woman is attractive? Standards man....standards
Freaking bigotI think identifying a man or woman (adult male or adult female) is quite simple……we follow the science. DNA is an excellent and almost foolproof way of identification. I also understand that a person can decide to identify as whatever they like and that is certainly their free will but a DNA test is reality. I, as an adult male, could use hormone treatments, implants and gender reassignment surgery to change my external appearance but I still could not birth a child from my pseudo lady bits and my DNA will still show an adult male (i.e. woman).
Topless play by play… what game and what channel….??I've got no problem with a woman in the booth. I'm progressive like that. Like Clay Travis I believe in two things: 1st Amendment...and boobs.
Why does having sex with someone mean that it's the deal breaker? Do you feel the need to view each woman as a sexual being? If you don't find a woman attractive that makes them not a woman? I'm sure I could go through some wives/gf here and I wouldn't think they're all knockouts.Every women by what context? Your context or my context? By my definition of what a woman is, I have preferences but they are not written in stone deal breakers. I’ve dated blondes, brunettes, black, white, Hispanic, Christian, Mormon… I think any woman is capable of my lust… by my definition of what a women is.
You are saying these people who identify as a woman are women but you immediately put them in their own category of women, separate from what I assume would be my definition of a women. Which happens to go against inclusion and affirming and is by definition homophobic. I dare you to tell a person with a penis that identifies as a woman, “You are a woman BUT a different kind of woman”.
It would probably help if you actually had a clear definition of “woman”. Which was Matt Walsh’s quest. The search for truth and reality. Truth and reality matters.