ND Coaching Search Megathread

Calabrese's People

Well-known member
Messages
910
Reaction score
715
Was listening to the Driskell podcast and sounds like team is going to or leaning towards Keeping Del for another year. I just hope this doesn’t mean we lose guys to tranfer

Option A: Keeping Del is critical to keeping that room together and recruiting at a higher level than he's shown capable of.
Option B: They dont think anyone can do any better and Tommy is committed to RTDB with an all blocking WOPU receiving corp.
Option C: There is no news leaking through any other reporters. fans are asking constantly. Driskell decides to say some stuff he can easily walk back later.

Lets play a game.
 

GrangerIrish24

I bring nothing to the table
Messages
6,980
Reaction score
14,675
Was listening to the Driskell podcast and sounds like team is going to or leaning towards Keeping Del for another year. I just hope this doesn’t mean we lose guys to tranfer

Counter to that, prister said on their podcast that there is some communication with a top tier receiver coach. Left it at that. Which to me says that are planning on moving on from Del.
 

chicago51

Well-known member
Messages
3,658
Reaction score
387
The real question is would keeping Del warrant a Marcus Freeman Revisited thread here on IE ???
 

Ricochet

Well-known member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
295
What is Kelly PTSD?
That he acted and coached scared under Kelly. He was scared of the ass-chewings from Kelly, hence why he would rather play it safe from mistakes with lesser and/or lesser talent rather the better/explosive talent that might be more mistake prone.
 

Ricochet

Well-known member
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
295
Yikes. That’s even worse than I thought. Total failure by the program’s leadership to bring him back if they seriously think he can do the job. Del’s the definition of coaching dead weight and he’s single-handedly bringing the offense down.
No doubt, I hope they move on but I don't think its a sure thing, maybe a 2/3 go to a 1/3 stay.
 

Luckylucci

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
27,770
Reaction score
10,153
We won't tolerate revisiting Marcus Freeman until AT LEAST three plays into the Ohio State game.

So true. In this moment, I’m fully prepared for this game to not go our way. But, when gameday comes, I’m sure I’ll be hopped up on ND off-season kool-aid, ready to run through a brick wall for Freeman, and be let down when it goes exactly how I think it will now.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,132
Reaction score
27,380
Counter to that, prister said on their podcast that there is some communication with a top tier receiver coach. Left it at that. Which to me says that are planning on moving on from Del.

Sampson also touched on the Mike Tressel suggestion. Suggested in his opinion Tressel would seem ideal. They kinda tossed around if the report of Tressel not being an option was a bit of a smokescreen. Sampson then said not to judge him based off his next game.

Lotta talk for someone supposedly not a real candidate at this time….
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,132
Reaction score
27,380
Sampson also said “serious traction” when mentioning Mason, the UC ST coach.

Sampson and Prister agreed said if it’s not Nick L it’s likely Mason then Biagi
 

chicago51

Well-known member
Messages
3,658
Reaction score
387
Poor UC. Poor Fickell. If we raid their staff yet again.

Then again my gut tells me Ryan Day is the next coach of my Chicago Bears (not a fan of the idea) and Fickell is coming home to OSU. So we might as well take what we want from them.

By the way I am a Bears fan but I'll gladly trade the Bears sucking for 10 years if it means ND gets Hartline from OSU and stays elite for another decade / wins a natty or 2 along the way.
 

rtrn2glory

Well-known member
Messages
16,180
Reaction score
6,473
Poor UC. Poor Fickell. If we raid their staff yet again.

Then again my gut tells me Ryan Day is the next coach of my Chicago Bears (not a fan of the idea) and Fickell is coming home to OSU. So we might as well take what we want from them.

By the way I am a Bears fan but I'll gladly trade the Bears sucking for 10 years if it means ND gets Hartline from OSU and stays elite for another decade / wins a natty or 2 along the way.

In the same boat on the second paragraph
 

OCIrish

Fukk Michigan
Messages
3,280
Reaction score
218
Poor UC. Poor Fickell. If we raid their staff yet again.

Then again my gut tells me Ryan Day is the next coach of my Chicago Bears (not a fan of the idea) and Fickell is coming home to OSU. So we might as well take what we want from them.

By the way I am a Bears fan but I'll gladly trade the Bears sucking for 10 years if it means ND gets Hartline from OSU and stays elite for another decade / wins a natty or 2 along the way.

That would make 3 of us!!!!
 

GoldenAura

Well-known member
Messages
1,216
Reaction score
2,578
Option A: Keeping Del is critical to keeping that room together and recruiting at a higher level than he's shown capable of.
Option B: They dont think anyone can do any better and Tommy is committed to RTDB with an all blocking WOPU receiving corp.
Option C: There is no news leaking through any other reporters. fans are asking constantly. Driskell decides to say some stuff he can easily walk back later.

Lets play a game.

C of course. If this came from anyone else I might be more inclined to believe it.
 

Irish4life

Well-known member
Messages
2,887
Reaction score
3,674
Option A: Keeping Del is critical to keeping that room together and recruiting at a higher level than he's shown capable of.
Option B: They dont think anyone can do any better and Tommy is committed to RTDB with an all blocking WOPU receiving corp.
Option C: There is no news leaking through any other reporters. fans are asking constantly. Driskell decides to say some stuff he can easily walk back later.

Lets play a game.

Ranking these in terms of likeliness:
1. C
2. A
3. B
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
So much contradiction from thread to thread. No need to worry about hiring a position coach who doesn't want to recruit because MFMF!!

Current coach can not improve his recruiting!

How do we decide when and where Freeman's impact gets the benefit of a doubt?
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,376
Reaction score
5,718
So much contradiction from thread to thread. No need to worry about hiring a position coach who doesn't want to recruit because MFMF!!

Current coach can not improve his recruiting!

How do we decide when and where Freeman's impact gets the benefit of a doubt?

Personal rule of thumb - whatever Driskell says, I believe the opposite.
 
N

ND88

Guest
Personal rule of thumb - whatever Driskell says, I believe the opposite.

Someone should write an article on the backstory here, because Driskell seems to be gaining traction with IB. Is he a proven manipulator of information?
 

SouthSideChiDomer

Well-known member
Messages
1,526
Reaction score
614
So much contradiction from thread to thread. No need to worry about hiring a position coach who doesn't want to recruit because MFMF!!

Current coach can not improve his recruiting!

How do we decide when and where Freeman's impact gets the benefit of a doubt?

At a position where multiple schools have reputations for developing 3 star recruits into draft picks, I want the best teacher.

At a position where the top draft picks basically solely come from the highest rated recruits, I want the best recruiter.

One coach has not worked with the current expanded recruiting department and was still able to get good classes.

One coach has worked with the current expanded recruiting department and still could not put us in a position to get better.
 

NDdomer2

Local Sports vBookie
Messages
17,050
Reaction score
3,875
We do not turn many 3* OL into draft picks mainly because we don't get many 3*OL or do I need to look back at classes?

Del gets no credit for the improvements made by Chase, Miles, Javon? Was Skoronek a sure fire NFLer before ND?

​​​​​​I'll stand by that we're picking and choosing when Freeman has impact and doesn't.

I'm not saying Del is perfect or should/shouldn't be retained. But if MF thinks that's the right move there are reasons for it as well reasons to believe there will be changes implemented in WR recruiting. Something that should help is landing a big time QB (something out of Del's control).
 

ThePiombino

The OG "TP"
Messages
16,476
Reaction score
6,245
Driskell was pretty adamant on multiple recent podcasts that he hasn't heard jack shit so he's ASSUMING Del is coming back. Not sure why anyone would take that as gospel.
 
Last edited:
N

ND88

Guest
We do not turn many 3* OL into draft picks mainly because we don't get many 3*OL or do I need to look back at classes?

Del gets no credit for the improvements made by Chase, Miles, Javon? Was Skoronek a sure fire NFLer before ND?

​​​​​​I'll stand by that we're picking and choosing when Freeman has impact and doesn't.

I'm not saying Del is perfect or should/shouldn't be retained. But if MF thinks that's the right move there are reasons for it as well reasons to believe there will be changes implemented in WR recruiting. Something that should help is landing a big time QB (something out of Del's control).

Thanks for making a great point. I’m sure there are also many behind the scenes details and reasons that might warrant Freeman keeping Del on staff another season. We’ll have to see what he decides, so until then, the doomsday crowd should consider taking a few days off for the holiday.
 

chicago51

Well-known member
Messages
3,658
Reaction score
387
I watched the IB podcast. Seems like they would definitely move off Del if there was a slam dunk hire available.

Just unclear if there isn't a sure fire grand slam candidate available they move off Del regardless and do a search.

Seems like with the o-line coaches reached out to them, and it hasn't been the case for WR.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,546
Reaction score
29,009
The reason OL coaches are reaching out to ND is because they have the best young OL talent in the country. It’s probably the best job in the country for an OL coach.

WR… not so much. But you can’t keep retaining a guy that has no idea how to find a “fit” for ND and doesn’t develop players (see: Kevin Austin still having a terrible release at the line of scrimmage as a senior).
 

SouthSideChiDomer

Well-known member
Messages
1,526
Reaction score
614
We do not turn many 3* OL into draft picks mainly because we don't get many 3*OL or do I need to look back at classes?

Del gets no credit for the improvements made by Chase, Miles, Javon? Was Skoronek a sure fire NFLer before ND?

​​​​​​I'll stand by that we're picking and choosing when Freeman has impact and doesn't.

I'm not saying Del is perfect or should/shouldn't be retained. But if MF thinks that's the right move there are reasons for it as well reasons to believe there will be changes implemented in WR recruiting. Something that should help is landing a big time QB (something out of Del's control).

#172, #203, and #114 overall in their classes. And, what, 1 is an NFL starter? With similar levels of talent in guys like Stanley, McGlinchey, Martin, etc. Hiestand has turned out several pro-bowlers.
 

IrishBoognish

Well-known member
Messages
2,345
Reaction score
3,628
The reason OL coaches are reaching out to ND is because they have the best young OL talent in the country. It’s probably the best job in the country for an OL coach.

WR… not so much. But you can’t keep retaining a guy that has no idea how to find a “fit” for ND and doesn’t develop players (see: Kevin Austin still having a terrible release at the line of scrimmage as a senior).


Bill Murray Voice:

THATS THE FACTS, JACK!


Im sure Del is a good guy, maybe even a good coach, but I sincerely hope MF and Tommy see that his time at ND has passed.

From hearing MF's thoughts about Tommy's autonomy with the offense, I have to believe the lions share of this decision is on him.

Choose wisely, Reesus.
 

irishtrooper

Well-known member
Messages
1,161
Reaction score
325
The reason OL coaches are reaching out to ND is because they have the best young OL talent in the country. It’s probably the best job in the country for an OL coach.

WR… not so much. But you can’t keep retaining a guy that has no idea how to find a “fit” for ND and doesn’t develop players (see: Kevin Austin still having a terrible release at the line of scrimmage as a senior).


Very strongly agree on both points. I’m hoping Austin returns to work on the release issue and to gain consistency. He’s got the talent to be a draft pick, but he’s gotta clean some stuff up….
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
16,132
Reaction score
27,380
The reason OL coaches are reaching out to ND is because they have the best young OL talent in the country. It’s probably the best job in the country for an OL coach.

WR… not so much. But you can’t keep retaining a guy that has no idea how to find a “fit” for ND and doesn’t develop players (see: Kevin Austin still having a terrible release at the line of scrimmage as a senior).

Yes also by Loy’s account of who’s reaching out….the guys we reached out to our the better candidates. Hiestand and Frye. The guys calling about the position are guys like Barnett at Iowa (struggled year 1), Rudolph at Wisconsin (hot seat, might go to Va Tech for a graceful exit), and someone I can’t recall who’s out of work after being in the NFL.
 

Trait Expectations

New member
Messages
887
Reaction score
455
#172, #203, and #114 overall in their classes. And, what, 1 is an NFL starter? With similar levels of talent in guys like Stanley, McGlinchey, Martin, etc. Hiestand has turned out several pro-bowlers.

Lol, this tickles my insides. The partial reality of your post is comedically bad. Go count how many additional 4 stars we signed on the OL that never materialized. The whole point is we need more 4 stars so we don't need 100% hit rate at WR. We are stacking some ridiculous talent on the OL and we need to hit on 5 of 18 incredibly talented players. In contrast, we need to hit on every single receiver because the room is in dire straits.

Hiestand turned out pro-bowlers with great teaching and great recruited talent. I think we all want both.
 

SouthSideChiDomer

Well-known member
Messages
1,526
Reaction score
614
Lol, this tickles my insides. The partial reality of your post is comedically bad. Go count how many additional 4 stars we signed on the OL that never materialized. The whole point is we need more 4 stars so we don't need 100% hit rate at WR. We are stacking some ridiculous talent on the OL and we need to hit on 5 of 18 incredibly talented players. In contrast, we need to hit on every single receiver because the room is in dire straits.

Hiestand turned out pro-bowlers with great teaching and great recruited talent. I think we all want both.

But that also ignores the four star receivers that never materialized. Maybe if someone needs to get away from family over the next two days they can figure out the hit rate for different talent levels on the two positions.
 
Top