Heard Irish Illustrated talk about it briefly, but I think they missed a talking point while discussing ND leap frogging Cincy (if Cincy has a loss). They seemed to think it wouldn't happen. But what if Wisconsin wins out, ND wins out, and Cincy loses? I know "quality of loss" isn't a deciding factor and "head to head" is one as it pertains to the criteria, however, this seems to only be true on paper, as the committee has notoriously over the years used the eye ball test and quality of loss to rearrange teams. Precedent being ND's "best loss" against Clemson in 2015 kept them in the conversation versus any "best win" they had. In this example, ND and Cincy have quality wins (Wiscy and ND respectively) and Cincy holds the head to head, but ND's loss is clearly "better" than a Cincy loss to anyone left on their schedule. Is it enough for the committee to rearrange ND and Cincy? ND's loss to a good Cincy team earlier in the year versus a late loss by Cincy to SMU seems like it at least opens the door for conversation. ND's offense is trending up (defense down w/o KH), but if these two teams played again, would we expect the same result? I don't think so, and I think that's what may help push ND ahead of Cincy if the above scenario plays out.
It's too early for all this speculation. A lot has to happen for ND to get in. I don't see how they do. But I do think they can hang around in the conversation (which is great PR) and I think they can creep up into the top 8 or even 6 as an 11-1 team if the right teams ahead of them lose.