COVID-19

[NDBoiler]

[TWEET]https://twitter.com/brooklynmarie/status/1397288523070246916?s=20[/TWEET]

What a time to be alive.

Because we actually live in a society with people who have zero credibility considered “influencers” or the fact the Russians did this?

 

[Irishize]

If anything the past year has been a case study on the effectiveness of masks both pros & cons

 

[notredomer23]

I suspect we might see a Memorial Day plateau or slight increase before crashing down in mid June amongst the unvaccinated. NJ has done a great job of vaccinating with almost 75% of the adults with at least 1 dose, but that 25% is mainly younger demos. Was in a club here over the weekend with 1000 others pretty much on top of each other and no ventilation. I am sure hospitalizations will continue to decline, but I suspect an increase among these demos will take place.

 

[IrishLax]

I suspect we might see a Memorial Day plateau or slight increase before crashing down in mid June amongst the unvaccinated. NJ has done a great job of vaccinating with almost 75% of the adults with at least 1 dose, but that 25% is mainly younger demos. Was in a club here over the weekend with 1000 others pretty much on top of each other and no ventilation. I am sure hospitalizations will continue to decline, but I suspect an increase among these demos will take place.

Now we know what 23 looks like:

 

[notredomer23]

Now we know what 23 looks like:

More truth to this than I'd like to admit. arrowryan can attest.

 

[NDdomer2]

Well not sure if anyone watched the 500 but largest sporting event in covid era and most people maskless, should be great case study for football season

 

[IrishRazor82]

Any Weinstein brother fans out there? Bret's discussion today on COVID blew the doors off of everything we've been told. Sounds like there are immediate efforts in place to silence him on social media.

Bret Weinstein is a superstar and I urge anyone with any interest in COVID, response, and modern medicine watch his discussion from today. It's can't miss.

 

[calvegas04]

Any Weinstein brother fans out there? Bret's discussion today on COVID blew the doors off of everything we've been told. Sounds like there are immediate efforts in place to silence him on social media.

Bret Weinstein is a superstar and I urge anyone with any interest in COVID, response, and modern medicine watch his discussion from today. It's can't miss.

Why not just give a quick recap? Doubt anyone is gonna look up these guys

 

[IrishRazor82]

Why not just give a quick recap? Doubt anyone is gonna look up these guys

It's too nuanced and they explain it too well. The amount of evidence in different areas they present can't be cliffnoted. You'd also miss out on understanding how thoroughly they were in addressing this.

I expect it's going to blow up unless social media cant surpress ir successfully. But Bret Weinstein isn't exactly a nobody so I don't know how this will go. All I can say is I know how long 2.5 hours is, but it's worth every second. You will not be disappointed.

 

[Ndaccountant]

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/31/opinion/media-lab-leak-theory.html

There is a bunch of truth to this.

 

[Irish#1]

It's too nuanced and they explain it too well. The amount of evidence in different areas they present can't be cliffnoted. You'd also miss out on understanding how thoroughly they were in addressing this.

I expect it's going to blow up unless social media cant surpress ir successfully. But Bret Weinstein isn't exactly a nobody so I don't know how this will go. All I can say is I know how long 2.5 hours is, but it's worth every second. You will not be disappointed.

You're right about one thing. 2.5 hours is a long time.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/31/o...ak-theory.html

There is a bunch of truth to this.

It was pretty obvious when COVID was gaining steam last year that the Wuhan lab was most likely ground zero. It's a shame that this wasn't pushed more. All they did was try to crucify Trump for calling it the China virus.

 

[NorthDakota]

Fauci's gonna have a hard time explaining this stuff away.

For any kids out there considering a career in public service....USE. A. PERSONAL. EMAIL.

 

[Irish#1]

Well not sure if anyone watched the 500 but largest sporting event in covid era and most people maskless, should be great case study for football season

I watched a lot of it.135,000 people. People were ready for an event like the 500. I think if they would have opened it up to more people they would have sold the tickets. A guy that works for me went to the race and said the crowd was energized and in Turn 2 where he sat, there wasn't much spacing between people.

 

[IrishRazor82]

You're right about one thing. 2.5 hours is a long time.





It was pretty obvious when COVID was gaining steam last year that the Wuhan lab was most likely ground zero. It's a shame that this wasn't pushed more. All they did was try to crucify Trump for calling it the China virus.

This interview isn't about it originating in a lab (although Bret has said that for over a year). That's old news, this breaks apart the corruption behind hiding Ivermectin and compares it to all other treatments used (vaccine and others). It gets behind the "why" of it, the blatant selective criteria for use, and really digs into the pharmaceutical agenda behind this.

I really think this is interview is going to be impossible to ignore in the coming months, this is your chance to buy early. Every minute is worth it. Side note, as a person who appreciates a meticulous approach to a sensitive subject, their presentation ability is freaking artistry.

 

[notredomer23]

I've listened to the Peru part and will continue after a meeting. I've seen a few Ivermectin studies and they've all fallen flat on their face but would be great news if there was an existing drug that worked for those that are anti-vax. Additionally, outside of RCTs, if it was a miracle drug for COVID, why would Peru have the highest excess death in the world?

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/peru-almost-triples-official-covid-19-death-toll-after-review-180000-2021-05-31/

 

[dublinirish]

Fauci's gonna have a hard time explaining this stuff away.

For any kids out there considering a career in public service....USE. A. PERSONAL. EMAIL.

Like Hilary?

 

[NorthDakota]

Like Hilary?

Lol and keep a hammer/cloth nearby.

 

[IrishRazor82]

I've listened to the Peru part and will continue after a meeting. I've seen a few Ivermectin studies and they've all fallen flat on their face but would be great news if there was an existing drug that worked for those that are anti-vax. Additionally, outside of RCTs, if it was a miracle drug for COVID, why would Peru have the highest excess death in the world?

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/peru-almost-triples-official-covid-19-death-toll-after-review-180000-2021-05-31/

The wealth of studies in this are unavoidable. The one that is most bananas is the Argentina one. An entire hospital staff of 1,200 was offered Ivermectin. 789 chose to take it, the rest did not.

58% of the ones who ignored is ended up getting COVID. 0% of the 789 got COVID. Same building, same jobs... The people in the US who haven't woken up are about to be shook up.

 

[notredomer23]

The wealth of studies in this are unavoidable. The one that is most bananas is the Argentina one. An entire hospital staff of 1,200 was offered Ivermectin. 789 chose to take it, the rest did not.

58% of the ones who ignored is ended up getting COVID. 0% of the 789 got COVID. Same building, same jobs... The people in the US who haven't woken up are about to be shook up.

source other than youtube?

 

[IrishRazor82]

source other than youtube?

They source everything on their websites and mention them in the video. I'm not going to parade this around, I just urge everyone to find the time. Anyone who tries to cliffnote the wealth of info and their ability to articulate it is cheapening their work. Sorry man, not trying to be stiff but it's true.

 

[TorontoGold]

They source everything on their websites and mention them in the video. I'm not going to parade this around, I just urge everyone to find the time. Anyone who tries to cliffnote the wealth of info and their ability to articulate it is cheapening their work. Sorry man, not trying to be stiff but it's true.

The youtube video I watched doesn't have any links? Maybe I'm on the wrong video, because it was quite easy to find and it's just two guys sitting in front of microphones? Is this the artistic one?

This is video I watched - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn_b4NRTB6k

Do they have any data or sources available that compare the efficacy of taking this drug vs a vaccine? Do they go into why an easily accessible two shot vaccine (or 1 shot J&J) administered by a health care professional is less effective than taking ivermectin which like any self-administered substance could be misused? The reason I ask this is because the data they use is largely from pre-vaccine availability, this would essentially be trumpetting the ease of using a flip phone for communication when you could be using a new smartphone.

 

[IrishRazor82]

The youtube video I watched doesn't have any links? Maybe I'm on the wrong video, because it was quite easy to find and it's just two guys sitting in front of microphones? Is this the artistic one?

This is video I watched - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tn_b4NRTB6k

Do they have any data or sources available that compare the efficacy of taking this drug vs a vaccine? Do they go into why an easily accessible two shot vaccine (or 1 shot J&J) administered by a health care professional is less effective than taking ivermectin which like any self-administered substance could be misused? The reason I ask this is because the data they use is largely from pre-vaccine availability, this would essentially be trumpetting the ease of using a flip phone for communication when you could be using a new smartphone.

This is the correct video and the final 6 minutes they talk about where to find all of their sources which are aggregated on their website. You'll have to listen and look if you want their homework.

While the vaccine is new, the effectiveness of Ivermectin is unequivocal at this point. And it's not only completely proven safe (unlike the vaccine which is will be unknown for years), it's effective at prevention AND treatment and without any compromise to your natural immunity. They share a mountain of supporting evidence for this, including some pretty incredible population health studies across Mexico, Peru, Argentina, and others.

'Crime of the century' seems dramatic but it's starting to fit.

 

[notredomer23]

This is the correct video and the final 6 minutes they talk about where to find all of their sources which are aggregated on their website. You'll have to listen and look if you want their homework.

While the vaccine is new, the effectiveness of Ivermectin is unequivocal at this point. And it's not only completely proven safe (unlike the vaccine which is will be unknown for years), it's effective at prevention AND treatment and without any compromise to your natural immunity. They share a mountain of supporting evidence for this, including some pretty incredible population health studies across Mexico, Peru, Argentina, and others.

'Crime of the century' seems dramatic but it's starting to fit.

Ivermectin is working wonders in Argentina
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/argentina/

 

[NDBoiler]

This is the correct video and the final 6 minutes they talk about where to find all of their sources which are aggregated on their website. You'll have to listen and look if you want their homework.

While the vaccine is new, the effectiveness of Ivermectin is unequivocal at this point. And it's not only completely proven safe (unlike the vaccine which is will be unknown for years), it's effective at prevention AND treatment and without any compromise to your natural immunity. They share a mountain of supporting evidence for this, including some pretty incredible population health studies across Mexico, Peru, Argentina, and others.

'Crime of the century' seems dramatic but it's starting to fit.

Maybe it will eventually prove more promising, but after a 30 minute google search, I didn’t come across anything close to “unequivocal” about the effectiveness. Some studies (most very small in size) showed promise, while others did not. It still seems too early to jump to conclusions. Hopefully it works out for the best.

 

[TorontoGold]

This is the correct video and the final 6 minutes they talk about where to find all of their sources which are aggregated on their website. You'll have to listen and look if you want their homework.

While the vaccine is new, the effectiveness of Ivermectin is unequivocal at this point. And it's not only completely proven safe (unlike the vaccine which is will be unknown for years), it's effective at prevention AND treatment and without any compromise to your natural immunity. They share a mountain of supporting evidence for this, including some pretty incredible population health studies across Mexico, Peru, Argentina, and others.

'Crime of the century' seems dramatic but it's starting to fit.

As someone who studied econometrics and accounting, I am not an auditory learner, need to see the papers and numbers. The website has charts but there isn't any proof of peer review.

As mentioned before, that's been unaddressed, why would someone with the availability to take a universally studied and researched vaccine administered by health professionals with the proper dosage choose something else?

What exactly is the crime of the century? Not sure anyone here is following that logic, strangely the link to the website has not been posted once (censorship? lol). A lot of people here are logical thinkers and would be swayed by seeing the data, scientific studies, and corroborating evidence from other sources. The constant "You'll have to read yourself" "You just have to trust and watch more video's" reads a lot like a pyramid scheme invitation .

 

[NDdomer2]

As someone who studied econometrics and accounting, I am not an auditory learner, need to see the papers and numbers. The website has charts but there isn't any proof of peer review.

As mentioned before, that's been unaddressed, why would someone with the availability to take a universally studied and researched vaccine administered by health professionals with the proper dosage choose something else?

What exactly is the crime of the century? Not sure anyone here is following that logic, strangely the link to the website has not been posted once (censorship? lol). A lot of people here are logical thinkers and would be swayed by seeing the data, scientific studies, and corroborating evidence from other sources. The constant "You'll have to read yourself" "You just have to trust and watch more video's" reads a lot like a pyramid scheme invitation .

yeah im feel like im getting something pushed on me by someone who didnt do anything other than watch the video. My Dad does alot of this and he was a big Qanon guy. If it was on a message board then it had to be true.

 

[Irish#1]

This is the correct video and the final 6 minutes they talk about where to find all of their sources which are aggregated on their website. You'll have to listen and look if you want their homework.

While the vaccine is new, the effectiveness of Ivermectin is unequivocal at this point. And it's not only completely proven safe (unlike the vaccine which is will be unknown for years), it's effective at prevention AND treatment and without any compromise to your natural immunity. They share a mountain of supporting evidence for this, including some pretty incredible population health studies across Mexico, Peru, Argentina, and others.

'Crime of the century' seems dramatic but it's starting to fit.

You're trying too hard.

 

[IrishRazor82]

Ivermectin is working wonders in Argentina
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/argentina/

The study referenced in the video was specific to *one* hospital staff of 1,200 employees. The entire country took a very different approach, clearly, so your point has fallen dead.

All explained in the video.

 

[IrishRazor82]

Maybe it will eventually prove more promising, but after a 30 minute google search, I didn’t come across anything close to “unequivocal” about the effectiveness. Some studies (most very small in size) showed promise, while others did not. It still seems too early to jump to conclusions. Hopefully it works out for the best.

The reason you're not finding it is explained in detail in the video... You not finding it is not a surprise...

 

[TorontoGold]

yeah im feel like im getting something pushed on me by someone who didnt do anything other than watch the video. My Dad does alot of this and he was a big Qanon guy. If it was on a message board then it had to be true.

I skimmed the video and found the following to be misleading or just wrong.

1) "Artistic" - For anyone who's ever watched a podcast, this is just....two guys speaking into microphones. It's the football equivalent of calling Michigan State's offense a work of art.
2) "Censored!!!" - I found it in like 30 seconds of typing the name on Google, one would think that if it was being censored it wouldn't show up in my searches. Oh, and it's hosted on Youtube....you know the biggest site for videos.

The fundamental question of why anyone would pass up a vaccine so they can self medicate themselves with this hasn't been answered. I also find it bizarre the actual link to the video or the site haven't been posted by him, if I was proud of the video and related data you're damn right I would post it when I made my post. Maybe scared of being banned for posting known misinformation?