MNIrishman
Well-known member
- Messages
- 2,532
- Reaction score
- 481
Common opponents. How badly did we beat Pitt on the road. What about Iowa at home?
I don't know how I feel about the rule, but that's textbook targeting.
Posting again as it hasn't been addressed.BCF Toys - 2015 FEI Ratings
If you look to the right you will see what each team is against each platform of opponent.
As you will see Iowa's top level of competition is AA. AA for Above Average (ranked 31-50). While ND is 0-1 vs Elite, 1-0 vs very good, 1-0 vs good, and 2-0 vs above average.
Totally disagree, he turned his body and head and led with the left shoulder...helmets did hit though. I replayed and watched it several times. Did not lead with the crown which is what the rule states.
It sucks as a football fan seing guys ejected for trying to break up passes
HahahahahahahaNobody gets breaks like the Iowa Hawkeyes. Nobody.
Hahahahahahaha
Totally disagree, he turned his body and head and led with the left shoulder...helmets did hit though. I replayed and watched it several times. Did not lead with the crown which is what the rule states.
By the way, I am an Iowa fan this year as it is my nephew's favorite team so I am not trying to pile on them and would love to see them make the playoffs...just not in our place.
Call wasn't "wrong", the rule is just garbage. I'm sick of kids aiming low with their shoulder and losing 10% of their season because the ball carrier/receiver loses his balance or dives forward with their head.
In this case, the Nebraska defender targets about 3' off the ground. And gets kicked out of a huge game. Just a joke.
I really think the Iowa OL is elite.
I don't disagree with any of this. It was a fine call. If you hate it, revisit the rule.
It's a VERY difficult balance. If you don't protect players, football may be in serious trouble. There will be lawsuits coming as we learn more about CTE and other brain issues. That process will result in overreactions and viewers needing to change their mindset about the game, IMO.
Looking like it right now. But I don't know much about Nebraska's DL and LB.
There's a really easy solution. Remove the ejection component, add a fine for the school and/or head coach.
It's fine to have an ejection component for the player, but it shouldn't carry over between games and ejections should be treated like they are for unsportsmanlike conduct... only the very egregious get a player tossed.
Can the NCAA do that?
I've seen iowa play a few times this year. I am fully convinced ND would drop 40 and win big if they played.
I think BC would beat them too.
There's a really easy solution. Remove the ejection component, add a fine for the school and/or head coach.
It's fine to have an ejection component for the player, but it shouldn't carry over between games and ejections should be treated like they are for unsportsmanlike conduct... only the very egregious get a player tossed.
I think ND would win by 14. I think Iowa would beat BC by 14.
Iowa can run the ball. Ferentz can coach OL.
*see...
A sweep with poor angles by the D (without their leading tackeler) is your proof?
You're coming off as a drink Iowa fan that got lost and found this message board.
Nebraska just has to keep hanging in there. Iowa has coughed it up a couple times already. If they stay within a score they should get a chance to win.
This Nebraska QB is complete trash.