That interception was very well played.
Still, it's nice that we finally have players who can bail us out with pure athleticism every once in awhile. When was the last time that was true?I don't get why people keep saying this. It's simply not true. Russell was beat on the play, and the ball was underthrown. If Kessler leads his receiver, that's an explosive play for USC. It was a great catch by Russell, but it was not a great play.
I don't get why people keep saying this. It's simply not true. Russell was beat on the play, and the ball was underthrown. If Kessler leads his receiver, that's an explosive play for USC. It was a great catch by Russell, but it was not a great play.
Still, it's nice that we finally have players who can bail us out with pure athleticism every once in awhile. When was the last time that was true?
My point is that we've seen teams like Florida State, Baylor, and Ohio State play BAD football at times and still put teams away with sheer talent. Even if KVR didn't have perfect positioning, the acrobatics of the catch are exciting to have on our side.We've had Jaylon Smith for 3 years....and Manti Teo before him. I'm not criticizing Russell. I'm just saying that we shouldn't read too much into an INT caused by a bad throw.
My point is that we've seen teams like Florida State, Baylor, and Ohio State play BAD football at times and still put teams away with sheer talent. Even if KVR didn't have perfect positioning, the acrobatics of the catch are exciting to have on our side.
I don't get why people keep saying this. It's simply not true. Russell was beat on the play, and the ball was underthrown. If Kessler leads his receiver, that's an explosive play for USC. It was a great catch by Russell, but it was not a great play.
We've had Jaylon Smith for 3 years....and Manti Teo before him. I'm not criticizing Russell. I'm just saying that we shouldn't read too much into an INT caused by a bad throw.
I don't get why people keep saying this. It's simply not true. Russell was beat on the play, and the ball was underthrown. If Kessler leads his receiver, that's an explosive play for USC. It was a great catch by Russell, but it was not a great play.
What you say is simply not true, re-watch the play. He is stride for stride right next to him and the only reason Juju got a half of a step of separation is because KR was adjusting to make a play on the ball. Idk what you were watching but I bet the coaching staff will use this clip to teach how to cover this route, it was absolutely perfect. I remember you saying in the gameday chat that KVR got burned on that play, just simply moronic to think that.
Juju is a freak, I'll say that much. Not sure if the cameras showed it, but he was hobbling around the field long before he got picked off on that play. He kept on playing though, tough kid. The fact he was still beating guys throughout the night on a bum ankle...would have loved to have him.
Right he is a great player, I said nothing against his abilities and yeah he burns CBs on the regular. My point is that he didnt burn KVR on that play like kmoose thinks.
Yeah, I have no comment on that play, other than I'm damn glad KVR picked off that pass. It was just a comment on Juju in general during the game.
Did he hurt his ankle before that play? KVR landed right on it when he was coming down with the ball, that was the first time I saw him hobbling. Not saying he wasn't, I just didnt see it until this play.
ESB got the game ball.
I don't get why people keep saying this. It's simply not true. Russell was beat on the play, and the ball was underthrown. If Kessler leads his receiver, that's an explosive play for USC. It was a great catch by Russell, but it was not a great play.
I honestly don't know how anyone could suggest KVR was beat on that play. He was in Juju's hip pocket. What is he supposed to do, run in front of him? He was glue, then made a play on the ball. Possibly the best defended pass of the year by our defense.
I honestly don't know how anyone could suggest KVR was beat on that play. He was in Juju's hip pocket. What is he supposed to do, run in front of him? He was glue, then made a play on the ball. Possibly the best defended pass of the year by our defense.
Reps. Moose doesn't watch the same game the rest of us do apparently...Russell was toast and Joe Schmidt doesn't miss too many tackles and has good coverage skills in space.
As somebody else mentioned, Russell had good coverage on the big play on the 1st drive too...that was just a good QB and a good WR making a play that you can't really defense...sometimes it happens and you just tip your cap.
I went back and found the play on youtube. It included a wide shot of the field from the snap. Russell's coverage was better than I thought.