'16 CA WR Javon McKinley (Notre Dame Signed NLI)

alaskatrojan

New member
Messages
28
Reaction score
2
He's most likely playing safety kr OLB at USC he's coming in as an athlete. Tyler Vaughns and Travon Sidney are the guys guy's they want most. Both SC leans now.
 

GBdomer

People's Champion
Messages
6,845
Reaction score
555
Javon McKinley 4*WR

Missed the train, no longer has a committable offer. If I had to guess I'd put my $$$ on Notre Dame. McKinley is not fast, he will be great in South Bend.

per

An upset USC poster obviously, guy talks shit about everybody but anybody from USC is a 5 star and they are getting everybody. Still lits Betuku and Shea Patterson as possibilities

Bold is my response
 
Last edited:

NDBoiler

The Rep Machine
Messages
4,455
Reaction score
1,826
Javon McKinley 4*WR

Missed the train, no longer has a committable offer. If I had to guess I'd put my $$$ on Notre Dame. McKinley is not fast, he will be great in South Bend.

An upset USC poster obviously, guy talks shit about everybody but anybody from USC is a 5 star and they are getting everybody. Still lits Betuku and Shea Patterson as possibilities

I'm confused. Are you saying that the first sentence is a quote from a USC poster from some place? Need a little frame of reference here.
 

BleedBlueGold

Well-known member
Messages
6,265
Reaction score
2,489
Guys at II seem to think ND is the pick in the end. All mentioned being curious as to which group he hangs out with at The Opening: USC kids or ND kids? Could be telling.
 

GBdomer

People's Champion
Messages
6,845
Reaction score
555
Guys at II seem to think ND is the pick in the end. All mentioned being curious as to which group he hangs out with at The Opening: USC kids or ND kids? Could be telling.

I'm sure he will bond with USC guys because he knows them but both parties have moved on. ND vs Oregon battle with ND having a huge lead thanks to a cute blondie.
 

GrangerIrish24

I bring nothing to the table
Messages
6,974
Reaction score
14,637
Its amazing how far we have come at wr depth, 7-8 years ago we were relying on Matt Shelton, Robby Parris and George West. Nothing against any of them, but it is amazing the difference in depth
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
Its amazing how far we have come at wr depth, 7-8 years ago we were relying on Matt Shelton, Robby Parris and George West. Nothing against any of them, but it is amazing the difference in depth

Not really fair to leave Golden Tate and David Grimes off that list. There are a lot of teams in the country that would have traded places with the Irish... Especially when Duval Kamara, a Top 50 player was one of your starters. Matt Shelton was long gone by then also... he was back in the Shark / Stovall days.

.
 

NDinL.A.

New member
Messages
8,121
Reaction score
1,734
Not really fair to leave Golden Tate and David Grimes off that list. There are a lot of teams in the country that would have traded places with the Irish... Especially when Duval Kamara, a Top 50 player was one of your starters. Matt Shelton was long gone by then also... he was back in the Shark / Stovall days.

.

He's talking about depth. Now, in mentioning Shelton, he should have said 7-10 years ago, but his other than that he is exactly right. Who was backing up guys like Kamara and Tate? Our back-ups are now athletic kids that could start for many other universities, and probably do well. Guys like Hunter and Holmes are miles better than West and Shelton. That was his point.
 

GrangerIrish24

I bring nothing to the table
Messages
6,974
Reaction score
14,637
I'm just speaking of depth. We had talent but nothing close to what we have today.
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,944
Reaction score
11,224
Its amazing how far we have come at wr depth, 7-8 years ago we were relying on Matt Shelton, Robby Parris and George West. Nothing against any of them, but it is amazing the difference in depth

Things eb and flow like that... although 8 years ago we were still dealing with the consequences of Ty's golf game correct??
 

NDinL.A.

New member
Messages
8,121
Reaction score
1,734
He's talking about depth. Now, in mentioning Shelton, he should have said 7-10 years ago, but his other than that he is exactly right. Who was backing up guys like Kamara and Tate? Our back-ups are now athletic kids that could start for many other universities, and probably do well. Guys like Hunter and Holmes are miles better than West and Shelton. That was his point.

I'm just speaking of depth. We had talent but nothing close to what we have today.

Hey, let me fight your battles for you!

Hahaha...I agree though.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,073
Matt Shelton was a stud. He was my favorite WR to throw to in NCAA '05.
 

OCIrish

Fukk Michigan
Messages
3,280
Reaction score
218
Well.......we are talking about Hollywood, I'm sure the fee will be small





at first!!!!
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
He's talking about depth. Now, in mentioning Shelton, he should have said 7-10 years ago, but his other than that he is exactly right. Who was backing up guys like Kamara and Tate? Our back-ups are now athletic kids that could start for many other universities, and probably do well. Guys like Hunter and Holmes are miles better than West and Shelton. That was his point.

Tate and Grimes were the back-up 8 years ago. Robbie Parris was the leading wide receiver and Kumara was lined up on the other side. Carlson was the leading receiver overall.

But overall, yes he was right. The depth at WR is better and much more plentiful than in 07-08... that I wasn't disputing only the fact that Golden Tate was part of that depth chart in '07 and that has to be mentioned.

It will be interesting to see how this current group shakes out when you can look back on it's production as compared to the 10 years ago receiving corp that you mentioned's production. Samardzija, Stovall, McKnight, Fasano & Carlson had pretty productive careers as really did David Grimes as a career 3rd option and to a lesser extent, Matt Shelton who had a couple of good years as a solid depth chart possession receiver.

Oh and Darius Walker was catching 50 passes out of the backfield too.

.
 

NDinL.A.

New member
Messages
8,121
Reaction score
1,734
Tate and Grimes were the back-up 8 years ago. Robbie Parris was the leading wide receiver and Kumara was lined up on the other side. Carlson was the leading receiver overall.

But overall, yes he was right. The depth at WR is better and much more plentiful than in 07-08... that I wasn't disputing only the fact that Golden Tate was part of that depth chart in '07 and that has to be mentioned.

It will be interesting to see how this current group shakes out when you can look back on it's production as compared to the 10 years ago receiving corp that you mentioned's production. Samardzija, Stovall, McKnight, Fasano & Carlson had pretty productive careers as really did David Grimes as a career 3rd option and to a lesser extent, Matt Shelton who had a couple of good years as a solid depth chart possession receiver.

Oh and Darius Walker was catching 50 passes out of the backfield too.

.

But Tate basically sucked as a back-up in '07. That is not quality depth like we have now. He could run a go route and that was it. Our back-ups now, if you're only counting 2 WR's and a slot, are one of Brown/Robinson, Hunter, Holmes and Brent, not to mention some talented freshmen coming in. Soooooo much better than freshman Golden Tate, who had like 5 or 6 catches that year, and couldn't beat out Robby Parris.
 

GrangerIrish24

I bring nothing to the table
Messages
6,974
Reaction score
14,637
Are we allowed to count the silent commit status of Arrelious Benn to the 07 team?
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
But Tate basically sucked as a back-up in '07. That is not quality depth like we have now. He could run a go route and that was it. Our back-ups now, if you're only counting 2 WR's and a slot, are one of Brown/Robinson, Hunter, Holmes and Brent, not to mention some talented freshmen coming in. Soooooo much better than freshman Golden Tate, who had like 5 or 6 catches that year, and couldn't beat out Robby Parris.

We aren't really disagreeing that much. I'd have a hard time saying Golden Tate sucked because he had a stat line of 6 / 130 / 1 and saying Hunter/Holmes/Brent are better when they had a stat line of 7 / 65 / 1. I do agree that the receivers today are a much better roadblock to the field than Parris, Kamara and Grimes were. The one thing that we can look back at and know is what Golden Tate would become and if you could trade a sophomore-to-be Tate for the 3 headed Hunter/Holmes/Brent today, you would do it in a heartbeat because one yes is better than 3 maybes and you are loaded in the freshman class too.

.
 

rtrn2glory

Well-known member
Messages
16,163
Reaction score
6,450
per

An upset USC poster obviously, guy talks shit about everybody but anybody from USC is a 5 star and they are getting everybody. Still lits Betuku and Shea Patterson as possibilities

Bold is my response

idk usc must be recruiting olympic track athletes nowadays b/c he looked faster than shit to me on his film.
 

NDinL.A.

New member
Messages
8,121
Reaction score
1,734
We aren't really disagreeing that much. I'd have a hard time saying Golden Tate sucked because he had a stat line of 6 / 130 / 1 and saying Hunter/Holmes/Brent are better when they had a stat line of 7 / 65 / 1. I do agree that the receivers today are a much better roadblock to the field than Parris, Kamara and Grimes were. The one thing that we can look back at and know is what Golden Tate would become and if you could trade a sophomore-to-be Tate for the 3 headed Hunter/Holmes/Brent today, you would do it in a heartbeat because one yes is better than 3 maybes and you are loaded in the freshman class too.

.

You're forgetting Robinson, who had a stat line of 40/539/5 (and he was hurt), and he's basically our next man in if you consider Fuller/Brown/Amir as the 3 starters. If we're talking just receivers, Robinson coming into this next year is simply outstanding depth, compared to the depth at WR in the year's we are talking. And as you said, the road to the field is much tougher today.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
idk usc must be recruiting olympic track athletes nowadays b/c he looked faster than shit to me on his film.

And the guys they are recruiting.... Vaughn and Sidney of Bishop Amat got TORCHED by Javon in the state playoffs. Throw the measurables out the window and watch his tapes from last year while paying attention to WHO he's up against.

100+ YAC against LB Poly with Biggie Marshall and Jackie Jones

14 / 240 / 4TD's against Serra HS with Brandon Burton and CJ Pollard.

11 / 282 / 3TD against Bishop Amat as I wrote above

13 151 / TD against St John Bosco and it's 5 FBS DB's.

7 / 103 / TD against Nicco and Bishop Gorman.

The only 2 teams that held him under 100 got blown out in the 1st quarter and he did it with a QB you'll never hear about Against the toughest high school schedule in the country.

Heres his season stats:

Javon Mckinley's Football Stats | MaxPreps

.
 

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
supposedly the knock on him is that he doesn't give it 100% on plays sometimes...this was something that was noted regarding him at the opening whether he would bring it
 

Irish Man3

Well-known member
Messages
6,582
Reaction score
949
How are people determining the quality of this rosters depth at WR? It's very unproven to this point.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
You're forgetting Robinson, who had a stat line of 40/539/5 (and he was hurt), and he's basically our next man in if you consider Fuller/Brown/Amir as the 3 starters. If we're talking just receivers, Robinson coming into this next year is simply outstanding depth, compared to the depth at WR in the year's we are talking. And as you said, the road to the field is much tougher today.

I didn't forget him. He's part of the roadblock in the Top 5 receivers. I won't be surprised if he leads the team in receptions this year. Not because he's better than Fuller but because of MZ maybe having a feel for him like EG had with Fuller and TR had with Eifert.

.
 
Top