alaskatrojan
New member
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 2
He's most likely playing safety kr OLB at USC he's coming in as an athlete. Tyler Vaughns and Travon Sidney are the guys guy's they want most. Both SC leans now.
Would love a shot at jack jones
Javon McKinley 4*WR
Missed the train, no longer has a committable offer. If I had to guess I'd put my $$$ on Notre Dame. McKinley is not fast, he will be great in South Bend.
Javon McKinley 4*WR
Missed the train, no longer has a committable offer. If I had to guess I'd put my $$$ on Notre Dame. McKinley is not fast, he will be great in South Bend.
An upset USC poster obviously, guy talks shit about everybody but anybody from USC is a 5 star and they are getting everybody. Still lits Betuku and Shea Patterson as possibilities
I'm confused. Are you saying that the first sentence is a quote from a USC poster from some place? Need a little frame of reference here.
Guys at II seem to think ND is the pick in the end. All mentioned being curious as to which group he hangs out with at The Opening: USC kids or ND kids? Could be telling.
Its amazing how far we have come at wr depth, 7-8 years ago we were relying on Matt Shelton, Robby Parris and George West. Nothing against any of them, but it is amazing the difference in depth
Not really fair to leave Golden Tate and David Grimes off that list. There are a lot of teams in the country that would have traded places with the Irish... Especially when Duval Kamara, a Top 50 player was one of your starters. Matt Shelton was long gone by then also... he was back in the Shark / Stovall days.
.
Its amazing how far we have come at wr depth, 7-8 years ago we were relying on Matt Shelton, Robby Parris and George West. Nothing against any of them, but it is amazing the difference in depth
He's talking about depth. Now, in mentioning Shelton, he should have said 7-10 years ago, but his other than that he is exactly right. Who was backing up guys like Kamara and Tate? Our back-ups are now athletic kids that could start for many other universities, and probably do well. Guys like Hunter and Holmes are miles better than West and Shelton. That was his point.
I'm just speaking of depth. We had talent but nothing close to what we have today.
Hey, let me fight your battles for you!
Hahaha...I agree though.
He's talking about depth. Now, in mentioning Shelton, he should have said 7-10 years ago, but his other than that he is exactly right. Who was backing up guys like Kamara and Tate? Our back-ups are now athletic kids that could start for many other universities, and probably do well. Guys like Hunter and Holmes are miles better than West and Shelton. That was his point.
Tate and Grimes were the back-up 8 years ago. Robbie Parris was the leading wide receiver and Kumara was lined up on the other side. Carlson was the leading receiver overall.
But overall, yes he was right. The depth at WR is better and much more plentiful than in 07-08... that I wasn't disputing only the fact that Golden Tate was part of that depth chart in '07 and that has to be mentioned.
It will be interesting to see how this current group shakes out when you can look back on it's production as compared to the 10 years ago receiving corp that you mentioned's production. Samardzija, Stovall, McKnight, Fasano & Carlson had pretty productive careers as really did David Grimes as a career 3rd option and to a lesser extent, Matt Shelton who had a couple of good years as a solid depth chart possession receiver.
Oh and Darius Walker was catching 50 passes out of the backfield too.
.
^ThisMatt Shelton was a stud. He was my favorite WR to throw to in NCAA '05.
To add to that can we count the verbal commitment from Greg Little?Are we allowed to count the silent commit status of Arrelious Benn to the 07 team?
To add to that can we count the verbal commitment from Greg Little?
But Tate basically sucked as a back-up in '07. That is not quality depth like we have now. He could run a go route and that was it. Our back-ups now, if you're only counting 2 WR's and a slot, are one of Brown/Robinson, Hunter, Holmes and Brent, not to mention some talented freshmen coming in. Soooooo much better than freshman Golden Tate, who had like 5 or 6 catches that year, and couldn't beat out Robby Parris.
per
An upset USC poster obviously, guy talks shit about everybody but anybody from USC is a 5 star and they are getting everybody. Still lits Betuku and Shea Patterson as possibilities
Bold is my response
We aren't really disagreeing that much. I'd have a hard time saying Golden Tate sucked because he had a stat line of 6 / 130 / 1 and saying Hunter/Holmes/Brent are better when they had a stat line of 7 / 65 / 1. I do agree that the receivers today are a much better roadblock to the field than Parris, Kamara and Grimes were. The one thing that we can look back at and know is what Golden Tate would become and if you could trade a sophomore-to-be Tate for the 3 headed Hunter/Holmes/Brent today, you would do it in a heartbeat because one yes is better than 3 maybes and you are loaded in the freshman class too.
.
idk usc must be recruiting olympic track athletes nowadays b/c he looked faster than shit to me on his film.
You're forgetting Robinson, who had a stat line of 40/539/5 (and he was hurt), and he's basically our next man in if you consider Fuller/Brown/Amir as the 3 starters. If we're talking just receivers, Robinson coming into this next year is simply outstanding depth, compared to the depth at WR in the year's we are talking. And as you said, the road to the field is much tougher today.