Irishcop
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,034
- Reaction score
- 332
Counter point: How do any of us have time to do actual work when we're on IE all day?
I work the night shift.
Counter point: How do any of us have time to do actual work when we're on IE all day?
Jimbo has no self respect. On Mike and Mike he said he has no reason to disbelieve Winston because he was never dishonest with him in the past. Does he think everyone will forget that Winston lied about the profanity incident? He is just shamelessly recalling only the most convenient version of the facts.
when does Winston have the time to study
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>VIDEO: Bobby Bowden on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/FSU?src=hash">#FSU</a> QB Jameis Winston: "He does things that kids in grammar school would do." <a href="http://t.co/pczxioZCND">http://t.co/pczxioZCND</a></p>— Matt Fortuna (@Matt_Fortuna) <a href="https://twitter.com/Matt_Fortuna/status/523126437230825474">October 17, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
The problem with Bowden, the first generation of criminole dysfunction, is the core of his statement; that grade school kids do what he did. Rape? Rape is equitable to immaturity? Bull-fvckn-sheet! Rape is deviant behavior. Nothing more or less. Until the media and authority take equating behavior off the table and acknowledge that it fits nowhere on the scale or plane of normal behavior, we are going to get people saying, "Awh, he really didn't mean anything by it, or "She was asking for it!"
And finally, if you want to see how diseased Bobby's perspective is, he clearly labled JW a sociopath, and said it as a good thing! (In the way he described his ability to turn all his emotions off when he was under center; chilling!)
But your whole premise is based on opinion, assuming that he did indeed commit rape. Are you saying you know something prosecutors and investigators could not reveal? Were you an eye witness?
Making an argument based on pure assumption is a weak argument at that.
Grammar school kids selling their autographs? Sexual assault? BB gun fights, shooting out of cars?
Bobby should have said that Winston has the intelligence of a child.
But your whole premise is based on opinion, assuming that he did indeed commit rape. Are you saying you know something prosecutors and investigators could not reveal? Were you an eye witness?
Making an argument based on pure assumption is a weak argument at that.
![]()
He's playing.
As an aside, I'm embarrassed beyond belief that Stan Wilcox is a Notre Dame graduate and handling things how he is. I know that he is new to the job and most of this mess predated him but he is doing absolutely nothing to get it under control... whereas he should be completely cleaning house.
I am embarrassed that they put September 17th instead of October 17th. Unless they have known about it for a month.
![]()
He's playing.
As an aside, I'm embarrassed beyond belief that Stan Wilcox is a Notre Dame graduate and handling things how he is. I know that he is new to the job and most of this mess predated him but he is doing absolutely nothing to get it under control... whereas he should be completely cleaning house.
That's not real, is it? They can't possibly sign their official press releases "hashtag Noles," right?
That's not real, is it? They can't possibly sign their official press releases "hashtag Noles," right?
One of my favorite quotes, "Not childlike, with its connotations of innocence and joyous abandon, but childish."
MASH reference?
In my short stay here I have seen textbook examples of neuroses, psychoses. I have seen voyeurism, fetishism, and a few isms I've never even heard of. And let me tell you this, General. These impossible people are in an impossible place, doing totally impossible work. They're mad, quite mad, all of them. And the only act I can think of that would be madder still, would be breaking them up.
That is a great episode of MASH.
wow, caught a TV reference from a random episode of Mash from thirty years ago... impressive.
MASH reference?
I wonder what would happen if the NCAA told FSU:
"We're going to fully investigate the autograph situation. Feel free to play Winston if you think he's innocent. If you sit him out, you wont receive any punishment even if we prove he took money. If you play him and he's found guilty, you will face significant violations."
I'm curious if FSU would sit him. I also think this is similar to what the NCAA said to A&M when they gave him the 1/2 game suspension last year. We can't prove anything easily, so just take the 1/2 game suspension and let's end this before we have to have a full investigation.
Did any of you really think he wasn't playing?
They sat him against Clemson because he yelled something vulgar on campus. So it wasn't outrageous to expect that they might sit him against us since mountains of circumstantial evidence regarding NCAA violations have just come to light. But no, that'd make too much sense.