People who dislike Bill Simmon's writing, why? I think most of his articles on grantland are decent. Though I think his writing has gone downhill since he's been put on the ESPN "Reilly train"
A few reasons for me, off the top of my head-- any and all Boston moments, past and present, are given greater significance by him than they realistically deserve; piggybacking off that, dude needs to get over Kobe Bryant winning the title and Finals MVP in 2010; I don't need nor want him to attempt to tell me why the Sopranos is great; I don't need nor want him to try and attempt to tell me why Drake is a great rapper; every time a player in a game that he is watching or attending does well, it's not a transcendent moment in life.
I think it's appropriate that you threw out Reilly when mentioning him. I think another appropriate description for him is Curt Schilling, circa 2004-2009-- an authority on all things and giving his opinion on all things (when, truthfully, people don't really care all that much). It's like he can't not say something.
Emcee brought up his total lack of economy in writing. And man, was that spot on! That was something I have noticed about him, but never really expressed into words. When I do read his stuff, I notice that I was reading for 8, 10 minutes (sometimes longer with his stuff), and I really only should have been reading for 2 or 3.
I was never really a fan of his, but now, I'm done with him for the most part.