No, you can't get a great education from most state universities

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
It's funny that FSU is the example here and you're making all these assertions that Magogian doesn't know what he's talking about, when he actually happens to be 100% correct per someone who did go to both schools that I knew through engineering at ND.

The kid's name was Damien and he was an orthodox Jew that I think had a couple Observer articles written on him while we were in school and some others might know him. He transferred from FSU because, in his words, he was getting straight As doing no work and partying all the time. As such, his grandparents* knew he wasn't getting a good education nor applying himself and insisted that he try to transfer to a better school. Somehow, some way that resulted in him ending up at Notre Dame.

Really cool kid and he was a life saver in our Spain summer program because he could speak Spanish 10x better than the rest of us. He said unequivocally that the education at ND was much more strenuous and demanding than FSU. It wasn't even close.

I know we have some other engineers on this board, curious if anyone else remembers who I'm talking about.

*I think he was living with his grandparents in Florida, but I could be remembering that detail wrong. Been awhile.

----

Unrelated... IMO, people who attest that the educational quality at large state schools compares to ND at all are either ignorant of how most large state schools are run or are ignorant of how things are done at ND. The one exception to this is engineering or science at a lot of places. It's shocking how strong certain programs are at otherwise unassuming schools like Kansas State or North Carolina State.

But comparing/contrasting with my little brother who just graduated from PSU is crazy. We had completely different experiences. I had maybe a couple large lecture hall classes my entire time at ND, most classes had less than 30 people, attendance was strongly emphasized, and many teachers went FAR above and beyond to make sure you got the best learning experience you could... it was also hyper competitive with good grades borderline impossible to come by in some classes. My brother had almost all of his classes taught in large lectures halls or online (seriously, PSU made a serious push to get students out of the classroom and into online classes because it cost them less $$), almost no teachers knew the names of students or cared remotely if they passed or failed... and very few teachers were actual professors, no attendance was taken in the vast majority of classes, and only certain classes were remotely competitive.

In the California State system (this was quite some time ago mind you) with lower division classes the first paragraph is absolutely correct. I took a general ed psych class with 250 other people. I regards to the second part of the post when you move into your major or concentration class sizes drop to around 20 people or so and I studied with some very highly regarded professionals in my area of practice in both my undergrad and graduate work.
 
Last edited:

Irish8248

Well-known member
Messages
1,994
Reaction score
880
Are we talking about difficulty of classes or amount learned through education upon completition? Just because a class is easy or hard doesn't mean the education value is different

If quantum physics at FSU was easy but taught topics 1234, and quantum physics at ND was hard but they too taught topics 1234, then the benefits of a ND class are more societal than educational (preparation, organization, time management). Unless the student walks away with a higher understanding of the topics at ND than at FSU.

Essentially the focus of the question shouldn't be on the difficulty or ease of the class to determine educational value but rather what the student walks out with in knowledge for that subject. Sounds like you need a proficiency test to examine the point rather than overall difficulty as the barometer
 
Last edited:

MJ12666

New member
Messages
794
Reaction score
60
Are we talking about difficulty of classes or amount learned through education upon completition? Just because a class is easy or hard doesn't mean the education value is different

If quantum physics at FSU was easy but taught topics 1234, and quantum physics at ND was hard but they too taught topics 1234, then the benefits of a ND class are more societal than educational (preparation, organization, time management). Unless the student walks away with a higher understanding of the topics at ND than at FSU.

Essentially the focus of the question shouldn't be on the difficulty or ease of the class to determine educational value but rather what the student walks out with in knowledge for that subject. Sounds like you need a proficiency test to examine the point rather than overall difficulty as the barometer

I agree with the above 100%. Additionally, once the educational process is complete one must be able to apply what was learned. I had two individuals reporting to me in the 1990's. One graduated from ND and the other from Montclair State College (small college in NJ). While I did not have any complaints regarding the ND graduate, the Montclair State graduate was exceptional and progressed in his career at a much quicker pace.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
But comparing/contrasting with my little brother who just graduated from PSU is crazy. We had completely different experiences. I had maybe a couple large lecture hall classes my entire time at ND, most classes had less than 30 people, attendance was strongly emphasized, and many teachers went FAR above and beyond to make sure you got the best learning experience you could... it was also hyper competitive with good grades borderline impossible to come by in some classes. My brother had almost all of his classes taught in large lectures halls or online (seriously, PSU made a serious push to get students out of the classroom and into online classes because it cost them less $$), almost no teachers knew the names of students or cared remotely if they passed or failed... and very few teachers were actual professors, no attendance was taken in the vast majority of classes, and only certain classes were remotely competitive.

And yet my time at Ohio State was much different than that. I had no online classes, 90% of my major professors knew my name, attendence for major classes was practically mandatory, etc.

Did I have large lecture classes? Yeah, with complimentary labs of ~25 students too, and massive student aid centers in addition to that.

It's pretty dumb to compare these state schools too, as the colleges and programs are vastly different. I was part of the engineering college, and the Knowlton School of Architecture, and that entire experience will be drastically different than what an economics major at Michigan State is going to have.

This isnt directed at anyone specifically, but if there's one thing I don't like about IE, it's these bullshit comparisons between academics. The whole conversation doesn't take into account what people want out of their education. What if I have absolutely no desire to go work on Wall Street? What if I want to be a fantastic HS English teacher and coach basketball? I don't need shit from Notre Dame to be able to accomplish that. There are an endless number of scenarios in which going to a state school will get you just as far as going to ND, and there are an endless number of scenarios going the other way too.

State schools have a job of educating the entire population, and generally have solid programs involving math and science and generally are hit-and-miss in the humanities. So one must do their research and see what programs are noteworthy and which aren't, as I would hope they do at any school.

I have no problems with discussing what level of education the football players at said schools receive, but comparing universities is just plain asinine in my experiences. Ironically the worst professor I had at Ohio State was a Notre Dame alumna.
 
Last edited:

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,929
Reaction score
6,159
I think it is very difficult, if not impossible, for a student to get an education at many/most state schools that is on par with the average education a student would receive at ND or an Ivy league (i.e. "great education"), regardless of how hard the student works at the state school.

Sorry, but I find that to be one of the most ridiculous, erroneous, and elitist things I've ever heard. How do you explain the countless examples of State U grads who succeed far beyond their peers from Elite U, or the student bodies at the most prestigious law, medical and other graduate schools containing so many State U grads?

Nobody is arguing that Elite U doesn't have tougher standards and a higher percentage of especially intelligent and hyper-driven students, but that same type of student at virtually any school, even an average state school, can still get a great education if he works hard enough, and will run circles around the average Elite U grad in the real world after college.

I took classes at Bama where we used the same texts as used at Harvard, heard the same lectures, covered the same material, and did the same work. I can't see how the guy at Harvard knew more or was better educated on the subject than I was. The key is how much effort and work the student puts into it. The biggest difference I can see is that at State U perhaps 10% of the students are exceptionally brilliant, devour every piece of info, go above and beyond to learn more, will put in the extra work, and do all this to actually learn the material instead of just to pass the class. At Elite U, you might find that 30-40% of the students are like that. Testing at Elite U is probably tougher because of this, and as someone pointed out above, you can't coast through some programs or classes at Elite U as you might at State U. If a student is willing to put in the effort, work hard, and take responsibility for how much he learns, he can get an excellent education almost anywhere, though.

I did my undergrad at Bama and got into one of the top 10 med schools in the country. My class was full of grads from Harvard, Stanford, ND, Yale and just about every other elite school. At no point did I ever feel that my education was inferior to theirs and I didn't find med school any more difficult than they did. It's not that those aren't excellent schools with overall better academics than Bama. It's that I did what I needed to do in order to get the most out of my education at Bama. One of my best friends graduated from Auburn with a degree in Aerospace Engineering. He's spent the past 30 years competing against guys from Cal, ND, MIT, etc. He's done quite well against the top grads from those schools and far outpaced any of the average grads from them (he's the VP of R&D for one of the nation's biggest aerospace/defense contractors).

Many of the top people in virtually every field went to a state university and clearly got an excellent education that's equal to that from an elite school. To say it's extremely difficult or impossible is baloney. How good your education is depends almost entirely on how much work and effort you put into it.
 
Last edited:

magogian

New member
Messages
1,467
Reaction score
155
Sorry, but I find that to be one of the most ridiculous, erroneous, and elitist things I've ever heard. How do explain the countless examples of State U grads who succeed far beyond their peers from Elite U or the student bodies at the most prestigious law, medical and other graduate schools containing so many State U grads?

Your question reveals that you don't understand my post.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
Sorry, but I find that to be one of the most ridiculous, erroneous, and elitist things I've ever heard. How do you explain the countless examples of State U grads who succeed far beyond their peers from Elite U, or the student bodies at the most prestigious law, medical and other graduate schools containing so many State U grads?

Nobody is arguing that Elite U doesn't have tougher standards and a higher percentage of especially intelligent and hyper-driven students, but that same type of student at virtually any school, even an average state school, can still get a great education if he works hard enough, and will run circles around the average Elite U grad in the real world after college.

HAHAHAHA but yeah... magogian is the one making unfounded and ridiculous statements, right???
 

ginman

shut your pie hole leppy
Messages
643
Reaction score
166
Your question reveals that you don't understand my post.

I don't understand the point or goal of your post either. That said, I did get my degrees at state universities.

I attended grad school with graduates from many of the "top" universities in the country, including Harvard. They graduated (or didn't in the case of the gentleman from Harvard), with the same Ph.D. as I did. In my profession I work with graduates from ND and am paid similarly. I am sure they had on average smaller class sizes and closer relationships with their professors than I did. Is the price differential for this worth it- it probably depends on the field. In my case, 10k vs.150k for an undergraduate degree would not have made much sense.

I appreciate that you are happy with the choices that you made, and am glad that they worked out well for you. We all have different paths in life and as I have matured I choose to be more interested in looking for the good in others choices. Your post comes across as being judgmental of these choices, opportunities and education that others on this site have had. I am sure that was probably not your goal when you started this thread. Best to you.

I
 

Grahambo

Varsity Club Member
Messages
4,259
Reaction score
2,606
I went from high school to the real world and then got a degree online and I guarantee you I am smarter and better suited for the real world then most on this board.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
And yet my time at Ohio State was much different than that. I had no online classes, 90% of my major professors knew my name, attendence for major classes was practically mandatory, etc.

Did I have large lecture classes? Yeah, with complimentary labs of ~25 students too, and massive student aid centers in addition to that.

It's pretty dumb to compare these state schools too, as the colleges and programs are vastly different. I was part of the engineering college, and the Knowlton School of Architecture, and that entire experience will be drastically different than what an economics major at Michigan State is going to have.

Isn't that basically what I said? Hell, I even bolded it. Engineering and science at your typical big State U (especially in the Big Ten which has incredible research) is completely different than the experience of students in your average liberal arts major.

This isnt directed at anyone specifically, but if there's one thing I don't like about IE, it's these bullshit comparisons between academics. The whole conversation doesn't take into account what people want out of their education. What if I have absolutely no desire to go work on Wall Street? What if I want to be a fantastic HS English teacher and coach basketball? I don't need shit from Notre Dame to be able to accomplish that. There are an endless number of scenarios in which going to a state school will get you just as far as going to ND, and there are an endless number of scenarios going the other way too.

State schools have a job of educating the entire population, and generally have solid programs involving math and science and generally are hit-and-miss in the humanities. So one must do their research and see what programs are noteworthy and which aren't, as I would hope they do at any school.

I have no problems with discussing what level of education the football players at said schools receive, but comparing universities is just plain asinine in my experiences. Ironically the worst professor I had at Ohio State was a Notre Dame alumna.

It's funny that you say this, because these ND sites are BY FAR more negative towards the merit of ND's educational prowess than just about any other team site. Why? Because there are many, many fans who did not go to ND.

Go read the boards of Michigan or wherever and it's 100x worse than what you see here.

The average high school applicant who enrolls at ND has qualifications that exceed those of your average Ivy Leaguer outside of the Big 3. If Big State U offered the same/equivalent educational opportunities, then why aren't those kids choosing Bama? Why aren't they just choosing the closest/cheapest/warmest/most fun option if it's all equal? Logically, the argument that you can get the same education virtually anywhere falls apart... because if that is true, then high achieving students wouldn't strive their whole lives for Harvard if they knew LSU was going to give them just as good of an education/opportunity.

Of course there are MANY exceptions and uber successful alumni from big state schools, little liberal arts schools, and even kids who got no higher education whatsoever. This fact has absolutely no bearing on whether or not School X offers a superior education to School Y.
 

IrishJayhawk

Rock Chalk
Messages
7,181
Reaction score
464
Of course there are MANY exceptions and uber successful alumni from big state schools, little liberal arts schools, and even kids who got no higher education whatsoever. This fact has absolutely no bearing on whether or not School X offers a superior education to School Y.

And yet the title of the thread is "No, you can't get a great education from most state universities."
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
And yet the title of the thread is "No, you can't get a great education from most state universities."

Maybe I completely misread the OPs, but the way I read it in spirit was:

"At your average Big State U it's possible to graduate with great grades doing very little work. That's not the case at ND. And while you can be uber successful and matriculate to wherever you want from Big State U the actual quality of instruction/education isn't, on the whole, on par with what you can get at ND."

I don't see what's wrong with that.

But instead of reading it like that, everyone who didn't go to ND seems to have read it as a scathing personal indictment. They're all "HOW DARE YOU INSULT ME AND MY SCHOOL!" That's not how I saw it at all.

Again, why do the highest achieving kids strive for Stanford or Harvard or whatever when they could go for free to Big State U if the educational opportunities are equivalent? Clearly, on the whole they aren't... either that's the explanation, or alternatively all of the smartest kids have to be making illogical/stupid choices to chase expensive private colleges when they could go to many other places for free.
 

Classic Irish

Well-known member
Messages
1,313
Reaction score
322
Maybe I completely misread the OPs, but the way I read it in spirit was:

"At your average Big State U it's possible to graduate with great grades doing very little work. That's not the case at ND. And while you can be uber successful and matriculate to wherever you want from Big State U the actual quality of instruction/education isn't, on the whole, on par with what you can get at ND."

I don't see what's wrong with that.

But instead of reading it like that, everyone who didn't go to ND seems to have read it as a scathing personal indictment. They're all "HOW DARE YOU INSULT ME AND MY SCHOOL!" That's not how I saw it at all.

Again, why do the highest achieving kids strive for Stanford or Harvard or whatever when they could go for free to Big State U if the educational opportunities are equivalent? Clearly, on the whole they aren't... either that's the explanation, or alternatively all of the smartest kids have to be making illogical/stupid choices to chase expensive private colleges when they could go to many other places for free.

I couldn't have said it any better myself.
 

magogian

New member
Messages
1,467
Reaction score
155
Maybe I completely misread the OPs, but the way I read it in spirit was:

"At your average Big State U it's possible to graduate with great grades doing very little work. That's not the case at ND. And while you can be uber successful and matriculate to wherever you want from Big State U the actual quality of instruction/education isn't, on the whole, on par with what you can get at ND."

I don't see what's wrong with that.

But instead of reading it like that, everyone who didn't go to ND seems to have read it as a scathing personal indictment. They're all "HOW DARE YOU INSULT ME AND MY SCHOOL!" That's not how I saw it at all.

Again, why do the highest achieving kids strive for Stanford or Harvard or whatever when they could go for free to Big State U if the educational opportunities are equivalent? Clearly, on the whole they aren't... either that's the explanation, or alternatively all of the smartest kids have to be making illogical/stupid choices to chase expensive private colleges when they could go to many other places for free.

Someone gets it.
 

JughedJones

Banned
Messages
3,147
Reaction score
359
Of course state schools aren't on par with ND. There are very few universities out there that are.

However, I just graduated last weekend from Portland State University. I'm a much better man and terribly smarter for it. The professors I was lucky enough to study under were out of this world. Not all of them of course... but I had 5 or 6 that have changed my life forever.

In the end, the caliber of an ND education is a gift and a blessing... but even a lowly state school will make you a sought after commodity if you take advantage of what they have to offer.
 

greyhammer90

the drunk piano player
Messages
16,821
Reaction score
16,085
Maybe I completely misread the OPs, but the way I read it in spirit was:

"At your average Big State U it's possible to graduate with great grades doing very little work. That's not the case at ND. And while you can be uber successful and matriculate to wherever you want from Big State U the actual quality of instruction/education isn't, on the whole, on par with what you can get at ND."

I don't see what's wrong with that.

But instead of reading it like that, everyone who didn't go to ND seems to have read it as a scathing personal indictment. They're all "HOW DARE YOU INSULT ME AND MY SCHOOL!" That's not how I saw it at all.

Again, why do the highest achieving kids strive for Stanford or Harvard or whatever when they could go for free to Big State U if the educational opportunities are equivalent? Clearly, on the whole they aren't... either that's the explanation, or alternatively all of the smartest kids have to be making illogical/stupid choices to chase expensive private colleges when they could go to many other places for free.

There's no problem in saying one school is better than another. But when you, again, stoop to bullshit hyperbole like making blanket statements that everyone in one school would fail if they went to ND, or to Busters point, treating every state school as though they're the same, you're going to get some blow back. Just like Koon does when he makes a ridiculous statement about a recruit.

I think you're a little quick to think the only reason people are saying this post sucks is because we all have ego issues. I'm pretty well aware that my undergrad pales in comparison to an ND degree on average. It sucks as a postbecause it's an over the top rant that's based in shaky logic.

Edit: I'll also add that refusing to explain yourself after being asked some simple questions about conclusions you seem to have pulled out of your ass isn't the best way to start a discussion.
 
Last edited:

gkIrish

Greek God
Messages
13,184
Reaction score
1,004
This thread is predictable. OP starts thread for who knows what reason. Bunch of state school educated posters get pissed. Couple ND grads defend OP. Couple other ND grads note how pointless this thread is. Bunch of people talk about how great their lives are. LOL

FWIW I went to ND and may have gone to less classes than anyone else I know. I purposely scheduled classes I knew were jokes. One that comes to mind is a psychology class that had no lectures. Rather you just had to take quizzes every week based on a textbook reading. 3 credits. Not even kidding. I took a science class with 200 other students (including Clausen and other players) where the professor literally said we were allowed to sleep in class because he believed we would still get all the info by listening in our sleep. I took another 200 person class where at least 30 of he kids would get up and leave after the sign up sheet was passed around.

Some of the professors were awful. My stats professor was brilliant but could barely speak English so I just didn't go to class.

So I acted just like many of the state school kids stereotyped in this thread and also did just fine. And I'm not very smart---my SAT was below average at ND so it's not like I had this leg up on everyone else.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
Of course state schools aren't on par with ND. There are very few universities out there that are.

However, I just graduated last weekend from Portland State University. I'm a much better man and terribly smarter for it. The professors I was lucky enough to study under were out of this world. Not all of them of course... but I had 5 or 6 that have changed my life forever.

In the end, the caliber of an ND education is a gift and a blessing... but even a lowly state school will make you a sought after commodity if you take advantage of what they have to offer.

Agree with all of this. Also, Portland is an awesome city.
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
Maybe I completely misread the OPs, but the way I read it in spirit was:

"At your average Big State U it's possible to graduate with great grades doing very little work. That's not the case at ND. And while you can be uber successful and matriculate to wherever you want from Big State U the actual quality of instruction/education isn't, on the whole, on par with what you can get at ND."

I don't see what's wrong with that.

But instead of reading it like that, everyone who didn't go to ND seems to have read it as a scathing personal indictment. They're all "HOW DARE YOU INSULT ME AND MY SCHOOL!" That's not how I saw it at all.

Again, why do the highest achieving kids strive for Stanford or Harvard or whatever when they could go for free to Big State U if the educational opportunities are equivalent? Clearly, on the whole they aren't... either that's the explanation, or alternatively all of the smartest kids have to be making illogical/stupid choices to chase expensive private colleges when they could go to many other places for free.

It has a lot to do with the "prestige" involved as well as the alumni base and the positions of power they occupy, which in turn opens a lot of doors.
 
Last edited:

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
This thread is predictable. OP starts thread for who knows what reason. Bunch of state school educated posters get pissed. Couple ND grads defend OP. Couple other ND grads note how pointless this thread is. Bunch of people talk about how great their lives are. LOL

FWIW I went to ND and may have gone to less classes than anyone else I know. I purposely scheduled classes I knew were jokes. One that comes to mind is a psychology class that had no lectures. Rather you just had to take quizzes every week based on a textbook reading. 3 credits. Not even kidding. I took a science class with 200 other students (including Clausen and other players) where the professor literally said we were allowed to sleep in class because he believed we would still get all the info by listening in our sleep. I took another 200 person class where at least 30 of he kids would get up and leave after the sign up sheet was passed around.

Some of the professors were awful. My stats professor was brilliant but could barely speak English so I just didn't go to class.

So I acted just like many of the state school kids stereotyped in this thread and also did just fine. And I'm not very smart---my SAT was below average at ND so it's not like I had this leg up on everyone else.

Dude... what? What was your major? And what were these classes? I thought I knew about all the breezers like Intro to Jazz and Ethology.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
There's no problem in saying one school is better than another. But when you, again, stoop to bullshit hyperbole like making blanket statements that everyone in one school would fail if they went to ND, or to Busters point, treating every state school as though they're the same, you're going to get some blow back. Just like Koon does when he makes a ridiculous statement about a recruit.

I think you're a little quick to think the only reason people are saying this post sucks is because we all have ego issues. I'm pretty well aware that my undergrad pales in comparison to an ND degree on average. It sucks as a postbecause it's an over the top rant that's based in shaky logic.

Edit: I'll also add that refusing to explain yourself after being asked some simple questions about conclusions you seem to have pulled out of your ass isn't the best way to start a discussion.

Yeah, the more I go back and read the nitty gritty I get where you're coming from.

Gonna go ahead and lock this now.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
Good closing note...
<object width="640" height="360"><param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/v/QnZ0Y4rvz6E?hl=en_US&start=60;version=3&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="//www.youtube.com/v/QnZ0Y4rvz6E?hl=en_US&start=60;version=3&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="360" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top